This paper contains an observation from a competition that was held by Liberty University. In the courtroom Observation four law students argue the case of White vs. O’Malley’s Tavern. The original case (case number 82A04-8876-CB285) has gone before the United States District Court in Northern Indiana. In the case Mrs. White is asking that O’Malley’s Tavern be held liable for her husband’s death‚ while O’Malley’s Tavern is stating that they should not be held liable for the incident. This paper
Premium Law Contract Lawyer
Abstract In the case of White v. Gibbs‚ the plaintiff‚ Mrs. Debbie White‚ sued O’Malley’s Tavern alongside Patrick Gibbs. Gibbs served as bartender at the tavern during the night in question. Mrs. White seeks settlement under the state of Indiana’s Dram Shop Act. Under the Dram Shop Act‚ a bartender assumes liability to any persons injured who were served alcohol while exhibiting obvious signs of intoxication (Todd‚ 1986). Since the two parties reside in different states‚ the case was brought to
Premium Civil procedure Plaintiff United States
2013 Courtroom Observation: 2008 1L Moot Court Tournament at the Liberty University School of Law‚ White V. Gibbs CA# -8776-CV285. This case is between the (plaintiff) Mrs. White and the (defendants) Patrick Gibbs and Stand Alone Properties‚ L.L.C. as O’Malley’s Tavern. A Motion of Summary Judgment on behalf of O’Malley’s Tavern in the US District Court of Northern District of Indiana. Is being argued/presented. Briefly; Mrs. White is suing the defendant Patrick Gibbs of O’Malley’s
Premium
Running head: Courtroom Observation Courtroom Observation Tracy D. Camden Liberty University BUSI 301 Robert Martin April 23‚ 2011 Courtroom Observation This court case took place in United States District Court in the Northern District of Indiana. This is court case number 82A04-8876-CB285‚ White vs. Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. The lawyers in this case are Benjamin Walton‚ xxxxx Van Meter who represent the defendants Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern and Jackson
Premium Plaintiff Judgment Defendant
Marin Shkreli and Leroy Jethro Gibbs are two seemingly different individuals on the surface‚ but from the standpoint of law‚ morals‚ ethics and values‚ there are also some glaring similarities. It is also interesting when comparing and contrasting the two in regards to ethical theory‚ including ethical relativism‚ situational ethics‚ social contract theory and utilitarianism. First‚ when it comes to law‚ morals‚ ethics‚ and values‚ we see similarities and differences. To begin with‚ let’s consider
Premium Law English-language films Difference
“You be the Judge” Week 5 Courtroom Observation Paper Research BUSI 301 Liberty University Indiana Northern District Court Judges: Chief Justice Raymond‚ Brown‚ Uphold‚ Batten‚ Grambo‚ Wray‚ Bryant‚ Cross and Allen Case Number: 80a14-5352-vc804 Plaintiff: Debora White Plaintiff Representatives: Ashley Gavin and Jackson Riley Defendant: O’Malley’s Tavern and Patrick Gibbs Defendant Representatives: Xander Barden and Katelyn Lippa Defendant Council Overview:
Premium God Intoxication Alcohol intoxication
Courtroom Observation.doc The 2008 2L Moot Court Tournament at the Liberty University School of Law presented a case which was argued before the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana‚ case number 82A04-8876-CV-285‚ Deborah White vs. Patrick Gibbs and Stand Alone Properties‚ L.L.C.‚ d/b/a O’Malley’s Tavern. The courtroom procedure’s purpose is to argue the motion of summary judgment with regards to the case of Deborah White vs. Patrick Gibbs; and Stand Alone Properties
Free Alcoholic beverage
There are many different models of reflection available but for the purpose of this assignment I shall be using Gibbs (1988). Gibbs reflective cycle is a simple analytical approach to reflection which encourages a clear description of the event. It also analyses the feelings felt at the time and includes an evaluation of the event and tries to make sense of it. Finally Gibbs examines what you would do if the situation arose again. Description A 89 year old woman was admitted to the recovery
Premium Nursing Pain Nurse
The book Courtroom 302‚ written by Steve Bogira in 2005‚ is about the criminal courts in Chicago‚ IL. Steve Bogira graduated from Northwestern University‚ and is an excellent reporter for the Chicago Review. Courtroom 302 is story told mainly from through Steve Bogira’s observations. Bogira observes a courtroom (Courtroom 302)‚ and basically the entire justice system process from beginning to end. The courtroom that Bogira observes is in the control of Judge Daniel Locallo. Judge Locallo helps
Premium Criminal justice Crime Prison
Courtroom Workgroup CJA/204 Courtroom Workgroup In The United States criminal justice system‚ a Courtroom Workgroup is an informal arrangement between a criminal prosecutor‚ criminal defense attorney‚ and the judicial officer. This foundational concept in the academic discipline of criminal justice‚ recharacterizes the seemingly adversarial courtroom participants as collaborators in "doing justice." The courtroom workgroup was proposed by Eisenstein and Jacob in 1977 to explain
Premium Criminal law Criminal justice Jury