Litonjua v. L&R Corporation December 9‚ 1999 Facts: Litonjua obtained loans from L&R Corporation secured by a mortgage. Without knowledge of L&R‚ Litonjua sold to PWHAS the parcels of land they had previously mortgaged to L & R Corporation. When Litonjua defaulted in the payment of their loans‚ L & R Corporation initiated extrajudicial foreclosure proceedings and L & R Corporation was the only bidder. When L & R Corporation presented its corresponding Certificate of Sale for registration‚ it
Premium Mortgage
R&R Introduction of Case Study Bob Reiss in 1983 observed with interest the success in the Canadian market of new game board called “Trivial Pursuit”‚ The sale of the game in the US tended to be approximately ten times those of sales in Canada since “Trivial Pursuit” had sold 100‚000 copies .Now Reiss thought game make a boom in US market and this make a profitable opportunity for him. After Graduation from Harvard Business School in 1956 Bob Reiss started working for a company of stationary
Premium Game Board game Business school
Also‚ this critique is shown in the case study of R.v Courtaulds Fibres Canada Inc. when the court had canceled out all of charges that should be imposed for the spill because this company had shown the due diligence towards to the spill. In fact‚ even though the company eventually avoided
Premium Environmentalism Environment Natural environment
Criminal Evidence Uniqua Campbell Central Carolina Technical College February 3‚ 2014 What is criminal evidence? Criminal evidence is any exhibit or testimony that will identify guilt‚ blame‚ or fault in a criminal case. In many cases‚ it is questioned upon what actually constitutes “acceptable” evidence (Ellis‚ 2008). From time to time there have been many cases which have been thrown out‚ and criminals who have gone free‚ because the evidence was “corrupt” so to say. To be
Premium Criminal law Evidence law Jury
upheld and fought for through the effectiveness in the Supreme Court. When cases make its way up to the Supreme Court it’s their duty to decipher the right and just judgment‚ making sure the individual’s rights and freedoms have not been infringed upon. The court’s effectiveness is able to balance the of the individual needs against society’s‚ ensuring fair treatment of judgment at the last and highest court. In the case of R v. Mian SCC 54-Cocaine with intent of trafficking is significant and is a
Premium Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Canada Law
English law is made up primarily of Civil and Criminal Law. Civil Law is concerned with the the Laws of Tort and Contract. Civil law can be defined as that area of law which is concerned with private disputes that occur between individuals or between individuals and organisations and where a proceedings in court is initiated by the aforementioned. In contrast‚ criminal law seeks to punish those that has done wrongs against the community. For example‚ a person who decides to take the life of someone
Premium Tort Contract Law
Written by Sambhav Dhawan Advocating for the Appellant Multani v. Commission Scolaire Marguerite-Bourgeoys and Attorney General of Quebec The appellant Balvir Singh Multani and his son Gurbaj Singh Multani are orthodox Sikhs 1. Gurbaj Singh‚ born in 19892‚ as being a devoted Sikh follower. Gurbaj believes that his religion requires him to wear a kirpan at all times. A kirpan is as small religious object which symbolizes the purity of the faith and his commitment to defend it3.It bears a
Premium Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
"Permitting free expression to the end of promoting truth‚ political or social participation‚ and self-fulfilment. That purpose extends to the protection of minority beliefs which the majority regard as wrong or false." R. v. Zundel. It was fair? Unlawful? Profile of the Law: Criminal Code of Canada Spreading False News Section 181 Every one who wilfully publishes a statement‚ tale‚ or news that he knows is false and that causes or is likely to cause injury or mischief to a public interest is guilty
Premium Nazi Germany World War II Jews
R. v. Tutton‚ [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1392 Her Majesty The Queen Appellant v. Arthur Thomas Tutton Respondent and Carol Anne Tutton Respondent indexed as: r. v. tutton File No.: 19284. 1987: November 10; 1989: June 8. Present: Dickson C.J. and Beetz*‚ Estey*‚ McIntyre‚ Lamer‚ Wilson‚ Le Dain*‚ La Forest and L ’Heureux-Dubé JJ. on appeal from the court of appeal for ontario Criminal law -- Criminal negligence -- Necessaries of life -- Manslaughter -- Diabetic child dying
Premium Criminal law
have always been controversial in the justice system‚ In order to figure out if an expert testimony should be accepted in court‚ Canadian courts follow the Mohan criteria (Pozullo et al.‚ 2016). The list of criteria was established due to the R. v. Mohan case‚ in 1994 (Pozullo et al.‚ 2016). Mohan was a pediatrician accused of sexually assaulting female teenage patients (Pozullo et al.‚ 2016). In order to prove to the courts that he was not a pedophile‚ Mohan wanted to provide‚ as a mental health
Premium Jury Expert Evidence law