Criminal Law‚ 26/04/11‚ Dr.Filletti Theft No definition of the offence of theft; Carrara gives us a definition which has been taken up by our courts‚ “The malicious taking of an object belonging to others without the owner’s consent with the intent to make gain.” This is the definition which our court uses‚ our law simply creates one distinction for these offences. The law creates two types of theft: Simple Theft and Aggravated Theft. Simple Theft: First element is “contrectazio” this is the taking
Premium Crime Theft Criminal law
Moloney [1985] 1 AC 905 House of Lords‚ R V Hancock and Shankland [1986] 1 AC 455 House of Lords‚ R v Nedrick [1986] 3 All ER 1 Court of Appeal*‚ R v Woollin [1997] Cr App R 97‚ Court of Appeal‚ Woollin [1998]3 W.L.R. 382 ‚ House of Lords.* Law Commission‚ Draft Criminal Code Bill. G. Williams‚ ‘Oblique Intention’ [1987] CLJ 417. Lord Goff‚ ‘The Mental element in the crime of murder’ (1988) 104 LQR 30. A. Norrie‚ ‘Oblique intention and legal politics’ [1989] Crim LR 793. R. Duff‚ ‘The politics of
Premium Murder Criminal law
Introduction and Overview The aim of this case is to present a contemporary criminal case. The case must have occurred in the last ten years. It must be an indictable offence‚ a more serious criminal charge where the defendant has the right to trial by jury and has been found guilty. The analysis of the case will be carried out through the extent which the law balances the rights of victims and offenders. The case which I have chosen is a major indictable offence of Murder and Manslaughter- starvation
Free Criminal law Jury
relating to the doctrine of recent complaint (S. 275)‚ sexual reputation is not allowed to challenge credibility (S. 277)‚ rape shield law (S. 276) S. 276 was challenged in Seaboyer and Gayme as being too narrow and exceptions were changed S. 265(4) introduced mistaken belief in consent Challenged in Osolin‚ found it was simply a codification of the common law mistake of fact. 1992 – Bill C-49 This was Parliaments response to Seaboyer and Gayme. (1) Replaced old S. 276 with new provisions
Premium Human sexual behavior Rape Criminal law
Criminal Law 2 Homicide 1. Murder a. Actus i. Act or omission must have caused the death (s 18(1)(a) CA) b. Mens i. No punishment shall be incurred by person who kills by misfortune only (s 18(2)(b)) ii. Intention to kill or inflict GBH(s 18(1)(a)) 1. Requirement that D has actual awareness of consequences of actions (Aiton) 2. Subjective test: Conscious purpose‚ decision not desire (Hyam) 3. Foresight of certainty (Woollin) 4. Knowledge of chance of consequences fulfils malice requirement
Premium Criminal law
Criminal Law and Procedure Assignment Student Name: Louiszen‚ Yip Hiu Fai Student ID: 10456052 Supposed you were the lawyer acting for Mr. Scissors Lee: 1) At the Trial of Scissors Lee‚ the prosecution would like to produce to the court the caution statements of Scissors Lee as evidence of his confession. Can you write out a list of your objections you will raise with the court to the production of the caution statement at the trial? ANS: Upon the production of the caution statement
Premium Crime Arrest Criminal law
16443 March 21‚ 1921 FACTS: When Leona Laciste endeavored to set fire to the house of Martina Rivera in which 2 children of the latter were sleeping‚ the two women grappled and Leona Laciste was boloed to death by Martina Rivera. As a result‚ a criminal prosecution for murder was initiated in the Court of First Instance on La Union. DECISION OF THE LOWER COURT: Guilty of Homicide. ISSUE: Whether or not Martina Rivera is guilty of homicide. DECISION OF THE APPELLATE COURT: Judgment of
Premium Trial court Criminal law Appeal
CIVIL CASE AND CRIMINAL CASE Civil Cases A civil case begins when a person or entity (such as a corporation or the government)‚ called the plaintiff‚ claims that another person or entity (the defendant) has failed to carry out a legal duty owed to the plaintiff. Both the plaintiff and the defendant are also referred to as "parties" or "litigants." The plaintiff may ask the court to tell the defendant to fulfill the duty‚ or make compensation for the harm done‚ or both. Legal duties include respecting
Premium Criminal law United States United States Constitution
MURDER !! DEFINITION The classic definition of murder is that of Sir Edward Coke (Institutes of the Laws of England‚ 1797): "Murder is when a man of sound memory‚ and of the age of discretion‚ unlawfully killeth within any country of the realm any reasonable creature in rerum natura under the King’s peace‚ with malice aforethought‚ either expressed by the party or implied by law‚ so as the party wounded‚ or hurt‚ etc. die of the wound or hurt‚ etc. within a year and a day after the same." For
Free Criminal law Law Murder
is a white-collar crime‚ it mostly occurs in corporations when a person uses the funds or assets of the employer for individual interests. Embezzlement is also common when we refer to the misappropriation of public funds. This usually occurs when the culprit has permissible access to the property and funds‚ as he or she has been entrusted with its handling and care. Embezzlement is a serious crime that carries penalties in both the civil and criminal court. Employees who care for public funds are
Free Criminal law Law Crime