injuries in the blaze. Answer both of the following questions. Both questions carry equal marks. Using case law to support your arguments: 1. Discuss whether Bob may be charged with the murder of Alice‚ Karishma and Jake; and 2. Advise Bob as to whether he has the necessary mens rea to be charged with offences under s1(1)‚ s1(2) and s1(3) Criminal Damage Act 1971. The area of law in which this question concerns is murder. It is necessary to consider the extent to which Bob is likely to be
Premium KILL Murder Terrorism
This essay affirms that it is possible to draw a distinction; albeit not a clear one. A distinction is important in order to avoid overlooking omissions‚ which can form a basis for criminal liability; and in the doctrine of actus novus interveniens. A clear distinction is seen in the definitions of an act and omission. When the actus reus‚ and mens rea of a crime exists – an act is an action that have caused harm to a person‚ or damage to property‚ while an omission is where an action that
Premium Crime Criminal law
CRIMINAL LAW A Criminal Law Introduction p: 2 Role of Criminal Law p: 4 Elements of a Crime p: 4 Strict and Absolute liability p: 5 Negligence Murder p: 6 Murder – different statutory approaches p: 6-8 Elements of murder p: 8 Pre-existing susceptibility Voluntary Manslaughter p: 9-10 Provocation (and abnormality of mind‚ excessive self defence) Involuntary Manslaughter p: 11-12 Unlawful
Premium Criminal law
Insanity Defense Donita Estes‚ Patrick Fostso‚ Jennia McCray‚ Yasmine McGee‚ Inga Payne CJA/354 October 22‚ 2012 Samara Belgarde‚ J.D. Insanity Defense The criminal justice system in America is one of the fair systems in the world where anyone will be innocent until proven of guilt. The whole concept of the court system emphasizes how our laws work regardless where we come from and how we look like or healthy or not anyone is entitles of due process. The idea that our justice and court system
Premium Mental disorder Insanity defense Crime
The insanity defense has been around since 1581‚ but the most people are familiar with the M’Naghten Rule‚ which was affirmed in the nineteenth century. Since then‚ many more rules and tests have been implemented to prove the sanity level of the defendant. There are lots of mixed opinions about the insanity defense and the most common argument is‚ “How do you know it is real?” Sure‚ in some cases it is obvious if they are lying or if they do suffer from a mental illness‚ but in other cases there
Premium
Introduction Criminal law is referred to as that branch of law concerned with crimes committed against the public authority. It is very different from civil law. An example is murder. It is very easy to put murder under civil law because it is a crime committed against another human being but the crime of murder is against the public interests. An example of civil crime is when a person does not honor a contract. Criminal law can be substantial or procedural. Substantial criminal law is concerned
Premium Criminal law Law Criminology
Invision a public duty that you a citizen feel you may owe towrds scociety ‚ such as ‚ disposing trash in the respected area ‚ paying taxes or ‚ serving a jury comission. follow this thoght with a public dispute of corelation to the law such as ‚ illeagal drug possesion ‚ driving under the influence (DUI) or assualt and battery . these can all be noted as public resposibilities and offenses and are shared among the populace. now think of a private duty or dispute ‚ one that may be within a household
Premium Crime Criminology Sociology
assignment will consider the differences in Civil and Criminal law. It will explain the roles of solicitors‚ Barristers‚ Judges and Magistrates. It will also critically look at the features of the European Court of Human Rights 4Civil law is a private law.it settles matters between two individuals and organisations. It still has the roman standard in many countries because it was originated from the Roman law. The end result is mostly damages in civil law. Example of civil cases includes Donoghue v Stevenson
Premium Criminal law Civil law Law
Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity: A Look into the Insanity Defense On Friday‚ March 3‚ 1843‚ the trial of The Queen v. Daniel McNaughton (West‚ Walk 12) began. The verdict of this trail changed the way the civilized world views the criminally insane. People who were criminally insane went from being viewed as evil and wild beasts to people who could not be held accountable for their actions at the time of the crime they committed. As time progressed‚ the insanity defense became an acceptable
Premium Crime Insanity defense Mental disorder
and imprisonment of Martha Stewart suggest about punishment in the United States? a. The more you steal‚ the bigger the penalty. b. Wealthy and powerful corporate executives are part of the population we think of as "criminal." c. The U.S. criminal justice system has an anti-corporation bias. d. Corporate executives are never subject to arrest and prosecution. (Factual; answer: b; page 220) 2. Which of the following concepts refers to “the recognized violation
Premium