Appraisal 1 Critical Appraisal by Gemekia C. Parker A Paper Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for NU 608 EBP & Quality Improvement in Health Care Systems University of South Alabama College of Nursing Fall 2010 Appraisal 2 Introduction Critical appraisal is the process of systematically examining research evidence to assess its validity‚ results‚ and relevance. (Hill‚ 2001) Critical appraisal of research
Premium Evidence-based medicine Dieting Randomized controlled trial
University: NUR 433V March 15‚ 2015 Introduction Critical appraisal of a research study demonstrates an understanding of the research study being conducted. This paper will review a qualitative research study designed to explore the lived experience of lay presence during adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in primary and secondary environments of care from a healthcare provider’s (HCP) perspective. The in-depth critical appraisal will include the problem statement‚ purpose‚ research questions
Premium Qualitative research Quantitative research
purpose of this report is to conduct a critical appraisal of a published article. Carnwell (1997) describes a critical appraisal as an unbiased and balanced scrutiny of the research paper so that both its strengths and weaknesses are highlighted. The focus of the appraisal with be on “Promoting the health of people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; patients and their carer’s views” (Caress et al‚ 2010). The format of the appraisal will be formed around a set of criteria
Premium Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Research Qualitative research
Critical appraisal is the use of explicit‚ transparent methods to assess the data in published research‚ applying the rules of evidence to factors such as internal validity‚ adherence to reporting standards‚ conclusions and generalizability.[1][2] Critical appraisal methods form a central part of the systematic review process.[3] They are used in evidence-based healthcare training to assist clinical decision-making‚ and are increasingly used in evidence-based social care and education provision.
Premium Creativity Design Evidence-based medicine
Critical Appraisal of ‘Intelligence and General Knowledge: validation of new measurement instruments.’ The aim of the present experiment was to investigate the validity of intelligence and general knowledge measurement instruments and therefore assess the extent to which these measures are an effective and accurate psychometric indication of one’s intelligence and general knowledge abilities. Arguably‚ the ability of researchers to accurately measure intellectual abilities is somewhat limited
Premium Intelligence Intelligence quotient Psychometrics
physiotheray Role of supportive management with therapeutic management among causes of COPD Introduction:- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)‚ also known as chronic obstructive lung disease (COLD)‚ chronic obstructive airway disease (COAD)‚ chronic airflow limitation (CAL) and chronic obstructive respiratory disease (CORD)‚ is the occurrence of chronic bronchitis or emphysema‚ a pair of commonly co-existing diseases of the lungs in which
Free Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Asthma Pulmonology
Critical Appraisal of a research article is considered as a basic tool for the evidence based practice in the nursing profession. This assignment is intended to appraise a quantitative research article published in a peer reviewed‚ indexed journal. The article is entitled with “Oral supplementation with L-glutamine alters gut microbiota of obese and overweight adults: A pilot study” Authored by Alessandra Zanin Zambom de Souza M.A et al published in the journal Nutrition in the year of 2015 (Zambom
Premium Nutrition Obesity Health
Critical Appraisal Charlene Clark Loewenberg School of Nursing Abstract The purpose of this critical appraisal is to review a particular recent research article with appropriate implication to nursing practice of the article comparing two acute migraine treatment modalities intravenous prochlorperazine and diphenhydramine versus subcutaneous sumatriptan (Kostic‚ Gutierrez‚ Rieg‚ Moore‚ & Gendron‚ 2010). Critical Appraisal Title and Abstract The title “A prospective‚ randomized
Premium
Appraisal of the Clinical Guidelines for stroke Management 2010 related to your specific discipline (Nursing) scenario. Introduction: There is the responsibility for health professionals to take good care of patients‚ also to seek and provide better choice and outcomes for clinical practice. Therefore‚ as nurses should develop critically appraising research skill in order to improve the clinical practice outcomes and nursing care from the current evidence includes Clinical Guidelines‚ evidence-based
Premium Nursing Patient Health care
Introduction A nurse’s career is not only professionally challenging but also puts great demand on physical and mental resources to cope up with the continuously changing environment within a healthcare setting. A nurse practitioner is expected to comply with the orders of the physician meticulously and flawlessly as well as take appropriate decisions on her own according to the ever changing situation in a patient care setting. Expectations from a nurse are enormous‚ especially from the patient’s
Free Nursing Registered nurse