Journal of Knowledge Management An evaluation of knowledge management tools: Part 1 – managing knowledge resources Peter Massingham Article information: To cite this document: Peter Massingham ‚ (2014)‚"An evaluation of knowledge management tools: Part 1 – managing knowledge resources"‚ Journal of Knowledge Management‚ Vol. 18 Iss 6 pp. 1075 - 1100 Permanent link to this document: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2013-0449 Downloaded on: 22 January 2015‚ At: 18:50 (PT) References: this document
Premium Knowledge management
The purpose of this article is to distinguish the various evaluation terms and methods into conceptual levels of evaluation terminology‚ being evaluation approaches‚ evaluation purposes‚ evaluation methods‚ and evaluation design. It also looks at health promotion evaluation in a New Zealand context. This article resulted because New Zealand Health Promotion evaluation was at turning point as originally it started from government top-down processes‚ then to a bottom up approach utilising various
Premium Evaluation Evaluation methods
Critical Evaluation Essay on Scissor Cut from “Scarred for life II” (1999) Scarred for life is a series produced in two parts‚ Scarred for life I containing nine images and Scarred for life II containing ten images. The series represents moments of transition between childhood naiveté and mature states of self-awareness as a social subject. Each individual work betrays the persistence of childhood and adolescent trauma lodged within adult memory. Moffatt used photolithography (which was the most
Free Photography Image Critical thinking
Critical Thinking I. What is critical thinking? a. Combination of reasoned thinking‚ openness o alternatives‚ and ability to reflect and desire to seek truth. II. Critical thinkers ask questions. Inquiring minds what to know. a. What am I taking for granted b. Did I explore all points of view c. Do I understand the question d. What information do I need e. Do I need to report anything f. What complications should I anticipate
Premium Domestic violence Abuse Child abuse
Software Qual J (2006) 14: 159–178 DOI 10.1007/s11219-006-7600-8 Usability measurement and metrics: A consolidated model Ahmed Seffah · Mohammad Donyaee · Rex B. Kline · Harkirat K. Padda C Springer Science+Business Media‚ Inc. 2006 Abstract Usability is increasingly recognized as an important quality factor for interactive software systems‚ including traditional GUIs-style applications‚ Web sites‚ and the large variety of mobile and PDA interactive services. Unusable user interfaces
Premium Usability Software engineering
Thinking is a tool of life. Critical thinking is a term of thinking deeply‚ in spirit‚ where to gathered information from experience‚ reflection‚ evidence to reach an answer or conclusion. Critical thinking is “the intellectually disciplined process of actively and skillfully conceptualizing‚ applying‚ analyzing‚ synthesizing‚ or evaluating information gathered from‚ or generated by‚ observation‚ experience‚ reflection‚ reasoning‚ or communication‚ as a guide to belief and action.” (Michael Scriven
Premium Critical thinking
Introduction Critical numeracy is the ability to make decisions about everyday issues that involve mathematical concepts (Watson‚ 2008). The approach to prove the importance of critical numeracy was based on selected articles which were used to critically analyse percentage. Watson (2004) suggests a three-tiered hierarchy of goals for developing the quantitative literacy skills. These tiers suggest increasing movement away from pure mathematical skills into context and then into critical thinking (Watson
Premium Critical thinking Thought Education
Scholarly Evaluation Essay Kathleen M. Streater is author of the article “Adele Ratignolle: Kate Chopin’s Feminist at Home in The Awakening” which was published in the peer reviewed journal‚ The Midwest Quarterly. After doing an extensive search of Streater’s background‚ it does not appear she has written any other articles. Although not an expert on the subject of Chopin‚ Streater makes a unique and convincing argument in her article. She uses expert quotes to bolster her position that “to focus
Premium Gender role Feminism Patriarchy
Program Evaluation Jackie Woodard Evaluation Methodology- HCS/549 December 6‚ 2010 Amer Kaissi Program Evaluation Program evaluation is a tool used for evaluating and assessing a program in place. This paper will describe program evaluation and how it can be useful for an organization wishing to determine the efficiency‚ effectiveness‚ and the impact of a program. Five of the most common program evaluation models will be introduced. A number of different models are used by those who evaluate
Premium Evaluation Evaluation methods Qualitative research
Within this essay‚ the author will reflect on a critical incident using a reflective model. In order to guide the author undertake this reflection‚ Johns (2002) reflective model will be utilised. As the first stage of Johns reflective model asks for the description of the event‚ the descriptive part will be attached (see appendix A). In accordance with the NMC Code of Professional Conduct (2008) the names of the individual involved have been changed using pseudonym in the form of James‚ Jennifer
Premium Critical thinking Patient Nursing