Name _Jordan Peterson___________ Critical Thinking Week 2 Homework (50 pts) 1. (12 pts.) Label each definition with the appropriate name of the fallacy from the following list. (Note there will be two fallacy names that are not used.) Ad hominem/attacking the person | Ad ignorantiam/appeal to ignorance | Ad populum/appeal to the people | Ad misercordiam/appeal to pity | Begging the Question/Circular Reasoning | Equivocation | Red Herring | Straw Man | A. Sliding from one
Premium Critical thinking Fallacy
course has taught me a lot about critical thinking. When I started this course I could not honestly tell you what critical thinking was. Now‚ I have a very clear understanding of what critical thinking is and what it means. Critical thinking is the ability to confront new or unfamiliar ideas‚ situations‚ and opinions by using logic and reasoning with an open mind. The three main things that I have learned and will continue to use while becoming a better critical thinker are the following. First
Premium Critical thinking Thought Reasoning
Critical Thinking Week 1 Assignment: Critical Thinking Describe a situation in which critical and creative thought could have been used for a better outcome. Describe why it is important to think critically and creatively in similar situations. While working at an agency‚ it was decided that the company should introduce a work-order form that would ease the load of work that was done by the administrative
Premium Critical thinking Thought Mind
Critical Thinking: Leadership-Development Programs University of Maryland University College Introduction Critical thinking is a process by which a thinker can improve the quality of their thinking through a process. It involves a series of process‚ that actively and skillfully conceptualizing‚ evaluating‚ applying‚ and analyzing information to reach an answer or a conclusion. This allows the reader to process the information received to come to a reasonable conclusion based on a reasoned
Premium Critical thinking Reasoning Logic
DMBA 610 Individual Paper Assignment Week 2: Critical Thinking and Decision making Assignment: Individual Paper Assignment: Individual Paper (15%) Your instructor will post a business memo that you will need to analyze applying the critical thinking model discussed in Asking the Right Questions. In a short paper (7-8 double-spaced pages) apply all of the steps of the critical thinking model to assess the arguments made in the memo. Include all of the steps. Leaving out discussion
Premium Critical thinking Ambiguity Reasoning
people to do great things.” The purpose of this speech to evaluate Oprah Winfrey speech utilizing the critical thinking skills that have been acquired during term. The paper explains the purpose of the speech as well as answers questions to why words or phases were selected. Running Head: Oprah Winfrey Eulogy for Rosa Parks 3 Given the General Education Assignment in my Critical Thinking class was to evaluate the famous eulogy that Oprah Winfrey had spoken on October 31‚ 2005 at Metropolitan
Premium African American Critical thinking Oprah Winfrey
University College of the Caribbean Bsc. Human Resource Management (Group B3 Sunday) Prepared as partial fulfillment of the course Critical thinking Lecturer: Ms. Sherrell R. Wilson Presented by: Andrew Onfroy BS08-12468HR3 Date of submission: November 7‚ 2010 The article was written by distinguished veteran journalist‚ Clare Forrester. Ms Forrester received an award in 2006 from the Pan American Health Organisation (PAHO) for effective leadership and was praised in the citation
Premium College The Conclusion School
me is mainly from myself finding Tannens theories to be not so far from fact. I feel the general audience reading this particular essay will be able to relate generously to the topic‚ as well as have shared views‚ and opinions. Critically Thinking Professor of linguistics at Georgetown University‚ Deborah Tannen describes in her article “The Argument Culture” the diverse American society‚ and their progression towards more aggressive forms of communication. Tannen discusses how
Premium Critical thinking Public Debate
perhaps confusion‚ then there will be no common conclusion between two people. If two people agree or have the same or close to the same thought then they are more likely than unlikely to come to a common conclusion. * Ch. 5 & 6 of Critical Thinking cover fallacies and rhetoric. What are two examples of persuasion that are not valid arguments according to the text? Why are these invalid arguments? * * The first example of persuasion that is not a valid is the argument of popularity
Premium Critical thinking Argument Logic
Personal Refection of Critical Thinking Critical Thinking is the process of using reasoning to discern what is true‚ and what is false. There are other factors in critical thinking that you have to take into consideration like logic‚ logical fallacies‚ separating fact form opinion‚ being fair and open minded‚ also asking questions not just o yourself but to others. Some other part of critical thinking is uncovering the truth‚ rationalizing‚ open to all points of views. When learning about how
Premium Critical thinking Thought Psychology