Republic of the Philippines Davao Del Norte State College INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION Laboratory School LESSON DESIGN IN MATHEMATICS III Quarter: Fourth quarter Year & Section: III- Libra and Gemini Topic: Deductive Reasoning Date: March 8‚ 2013 SY: 2012-2013 Time Frame: 10:00-11:00 am and 2:00-3:00 pm Cooperating Teacher: Ms. Cherry Ann Nicolas Preparatory Activities: |Teacher’s Activity |Student’s Activity
Premium Problem solving Inductive reasoning Logic
Chapter 2 Deductive Reasoning In chapter 1 we distinguished between deductive and inductive reasoning. As you have seen‚ in the former the conclusion follows necessarily from the premises‚ whereas in the latter the conclusion follows from the premises with a degree of probability. In this chapter we will examine some basic concepts of deductive logic. Basics of Deductive Reasoning Logical Form All deductive arguments have argument forms. An argument form is a symbolic representation of an argument
Premium Logic
Redaction Criticism and Textual Criticism Introduction Imagine yourself excitedly waiting for a movie‚ about your favorite novel‚ to come out. Finally the day comes when it starts showing in the theatres. You used all your connections to be able to get premiere tickets for the movie. You are about to watch the movie about your favorite novel… Coming out of the theatres‚ you feel cheated. All the excitement‚ all the hype left you disappointed. You say to yourself‚ this isn’t what was in the
Premium Bible Old Testament
Often times lines become blurred regarding inductions and deductive reasoning as they apply to forensic sciences. Inductions are described by Thornton (1997b‚ p. 13) as an inference that is derived by specific observations to a generalization‚ or an assumption that may not always be valid. On the other hand‚ a deductive reasoning is defined as a forensics-evidence-based‚ process-oriented method of investigative reasoning based off of the behavioral patterns of a particular offender (Turvey‚ 1999)
Premium Crime Police Criminal law
Problems with Descartes Deductive Proofs for God Descartes “Meditations of First Philosophy” put forward two arguments for the existence of God‚ both of which are a priori. These arguments are the Trademark argument and the Ontological argument. I shall be describing these arguments then demonstrating that they are unsatisfying in proving God’s existence. To do this I shall be discussing criticisms put forward in response to both the Trademark and Ontological arguments. These criticisms I shall be discussing
Premium Metaphysics Ontology Existence
1 Translation Quality Assessment A case study of Ernest Hemingway’s ‘the Killers’ Translated by Najaf Daryabandari According to Newmark’s translation criticism Marjan Tavakoli Kerman Institute of Higher Education May 2014 2 Introduction "The Killers‚" Ernest Hemingway’s story about two hit men who come to a small town to kill a former prizefighter‚ was first published in the March 1927 issue of Scribner’s Magazine. Hemingway was paid two hundred dollars for the story‚ which was
Free Ernest Hemingway
Construct a deductive argument that is valid but not sound. Then‚ construct a valid deductive argument that is sound. Be sure to put the argument in premise-conclusion form. Your initial post should be at least 150 words in length. Respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts by Day 7. When responding to your classmates‚ consider why the sound deductive argument might be seen by some as being valid but not sound. Pistachios are very addictive‚ Mike eats a lot of pistachio ice cream because
Premium Inductive reasoning Logic Deductive reasoning
Compare and Contrast the Inductive and Deductive Research Paradigm/Approaches When underlying assumptions and intellectual structure are built upon research‚ observation‚ or development in a field of inquiry a paradigm is created. The way we perceive the world around us or the way facts and theories are established are generated in different ways. Knowledge is constantly being produced‚ based on assumptions or reasoning. One might see a story in the news of a shark in Southern California that attacks
Premium Scientific method
DEDUCTIVE AND INDUCTIVE GRAMMAR TEACHING By Arnis Silvia (arnis.silvia@gmail.com) I. Introduction: What is Grammar Teaching and Why? In traditional setting‚ grammar teaching is seen as the presentation and practice of discrete grammatical structures. More comprehensively‚ Ellis1 (2006) defines grammar teaching as: Grammar teaching involves any instructional technique that draws learners ’ attention to some specific grammatical form in such a way that it helps them either to understand it
Premium Language acquisition Linguistics Language education
other peoples work to aid her. The role of deductive reasoning is to take general statements or premises to reach a decision. For the fifth argument Jenna takes her friends experience into consideration when looking to cheat or not to with her class. She is going off of a general discussion with her friend and not looking further into it. This is deductive reasoning as she is not using any numbers or facts to support the argument. The process of deductive reasoning helps one understand an argument
Premium Logic Reasoning Inductive reasoning