Reasoning: – Facts‚ Inferences‚ Judgments – Premises & Conclusion A fact is information that is verifiable‚ or can be “proven” to be true. How do we verify it? We observe it for ourselves by - looking out the window to see if it’s raining - touching a snake to see that it’s not slimy - tasting the soup to find out if it is salty Or we trust other people to tell us facts - a friend who says the class has been canceled - a newspaper reporter who describes an earthquake in
Premium Logic Reasoning
After learning about the Stanley Milgram experiment‚ I found myself questioning why and how the majority of the subjects that participated in the experiment were willing to inflict apparent pain and injury on an innocent person‚ and found myself curious as to how I would react should I but put in the same situation. I believe that the most significant reason for this disturbing absence of critical thinking and moral responsibility is because the subjects involved in the experiment were blinded by
Premium Stanford prison experiment Critical thinking Milgram experiment
Makayla may benefit with a little more confluence or technical reasoning and a little less sequence. She could broaden her horizons with the confluence. Reach out for new ways to come to a conclusion with her testing and homework. The technical reasoning may help her as well by using a more hands on approach towards her work. The confluence would help her become more original in her homework and testing as well. John is all over the place with his writing. Not only that‚ but he is
Premium Writing Essay Learning
Discussion Questions 1. What specific techniques were used to bring about the destruction of self-awareness among the prisoners? The prison camp used social alienation techniques to bring about the destruction of self-awareness among the prisoners. They treated each prisoner like animals and did not acknowledge them as human beings. The ability to cater to basic human functions as we do was taken away. This degradation broke the prisoners down and stripped them of their personal traits. This
Premium Prison Person Personality psychology
IMMANUEL KANT’S THEORY Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) discussed many ethical systems and reasonings. Some were based on a belief that the reason is the final authority for morality. In Kant’s eyes‚ reason is directly correlated with morals and ideals. Actions of any sort‚ he believed‚ must be undertaken from a sense of duty dictated by reason‚ and no action performed for appropriateness or solely in obedience to law or custom can be regarded as moral. A moral act is an act done for the "right" reasons
Premium Immanuel Kant Ethics Morality
Gensler’s reasoning against cultural relativism(CR) is that the existence of so many subgroups makes it impossible to be correct. The fact that so many subcultures have so many varying morals means that nothing in thought can be morally wrong and therefore nothing is objective. Gensler uses the example “My Nazi society approves of racism‚ so racism is good” ( page 187) this shows the effectivity of this ethical theory. Gensler’s reasoning is supported by Enochs “Why I Am an Objectivist about Ethics
Premium Morality Cultural relativism Culture
Cultural Relativism Introduction According to www.gotquestions.org/cultural-relavitsim‚ cultural relativism is the view that all beliefs‚ customs‚ and ethics are related to the social norms and culture that one comes from. In other words‚ right and wrong or good and bad are culture-specific‚ meaning that what is reflected moral in one society may be reflected immoral in another. Therefore‚ since no collective standard of morality subsists‚ no one has the right to judge another society’s customs
Premium Morality Cultural relativism Ethics
Analyse the reasoning of the ontological argument as presented by Anselm‚ and explain its purpose. The ontological argument is A priori argument for the existence of God. St Anselm is the name most firmly associated with the origins of the ontological argument and he was an 11 century writer and the Archbishop of Canterbury. The argument has the form of a deductive proof and it an analytical argument. He wrote two treatises (the Monologion and Proslogion) which became the foundation of the Ontological
Premium Logic Ontological argument Ontology
Common law reasoning and institutions Adam Gearey Wayne Morrison This subject guide was prepared for the University of London International Programmes by: Adam Gearey‚ Professor of Law‚ Birkbeck‚ University of London and Wayne Morrison‚ Professor of Law‚ Queen Mary‚ University of London Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank Angela Boots and Vicky Thanapal for the preparation of Chapter 3‚ and Clare Williams‚ LLM. This is one of a series of subject guides published
Free Common law Law
from the Enlightenment thinkers. It focused on the use of reasoning to describe one’s own existence in the world. Freud took a vastly different approach. He focused on the mysteriousness of the unconscious mind that cannot be explained using reason nor logic. The ideas created by Sigmund Freud caused a great outcry from the masses and challenged all the ideas of the Enlightenment thinkers. His works challenged the Enlightenment’s use of reasoning and described a view of humanity as an imperfect and unable
Premium Mind Psychology Sigmund Freud