1. Edward Norton is one of the most versatile actors of our time. He gave brilliant performances as a neo-nazi and as a terrorist with a split personality. Which of the following best describes the above passage: Student Response Correct Answer Feedback A. Argument B. Explanation C. Description D. None of the above Score: 1/1 2. SOME PHILOSOPHERS ARE UNATTRACTIVE. For the above statement in capital letters‚ identify the SUBJECT CLASS
Premium Fallacy Definition
There are four elements to a valid contract. 1. At least two separate parties entering into an agreement: The agreement can be between two people‚ or one person and a company or between two companies. 2. The parties are qualified to agree to the terms and conditions in the contract: The parties must be of legal age and have an understanding of what the contract is and details it outlines. 3. Both parties are receiving consideration or value from the agreement: This is most commonly
Premium Contract
understand their POV (Paul & Dennis‚ pp 2-4). Prime example being the terror attacks of 11 September 2001. Many news channels and other media officials highlighted in their own perspective and ways. According to them 9/11‚ relate with the understanding of current events (Tom‚ pp 6-7). Others do not even come close to the topic as they think it is useless to talk about what they do not know. The news media creates the doubt of the individuals specially those who suffered the wrath of 9/11 and other similar
Premium Mass media Terrorism September 11 attacks
consider whether ‘Sharon’s Study’ is ecologically valid‚ we need to see if this study can be related to‚ or reflects everyday‚ real life. Studies with high ecological validity take place when participants are within their usual surroundings and behaving naturally so that results can be generalised beyond the setting they were carried out in‚ whereas studies low in ecological validity cannot. Based on this definition‚ ‘Sharon’s study’ is not ecologically valid due to potential biases related to the opportunity
Premium Scientific method Research Statistics
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning A valid argument is made to address a specific problem by offering a position and proving reasons to support that position. A valid argument is based on two key components‚ one or more premise and conclusion. A premise is fact and/or opinion and must be proven to be true or false. And a conclusion is the final statement of the position one is taking on an issue or question. In deductive reasoning‚ if the fact is true the conclusion must be true because the conclusion
Premium
If the parts of a work are not themselves authentic‚ but the whole is‚ what does that mean for one’s definition of authentic? Our Centos are essentially taking other peoples’ idea and smashing them together to create our own chimera. poem. This could also be said of Guernica because Picasso was not in Guernica when it was bombed. If the Centos are not themselves authentic how can Guernica be? The feelings are real in Guernica‚ but are not (arguably) in our centos. Does this distinction give more
Premium Hip hop Hip hop music Art
Making Enchiladas & Right Decisions Analysis In this editorial‚ the value of ethnic foods is reassessed. There is an issue made obvious in the first paragraph‚ where I state that the United States is made up of a wide variety of cultures and ethnicities. Restaurant owners see this diversity as a good thing because they have been able to “fuse[d] ethnic foods and flavors to newfangled American palates”. The real problem is paraphrased at the end of the first paragraph‚ where I explain that this
Premium Rhetoric
1. Define Authentic Leadership: provide a clear definition of authentic leadership. Include examples from your life experiences where you have encountered an authentic leader. Provide examples of how authentic leadership creates a healthy work environment. (20 points) Authentic leadership is a style of leading that leans upon the leader’s personal core values and is demonstrated in the 4 separate areas: self-awareness‚ internalized moral perspective‚ balanced processing‚ relational transparency
Premium Management Leadership Skill
------------------------------------------------- Mens Rea (Blameworthiness) Introduction Duff = “responsibility is a necessary but not a sufficient condition of liability” An actor is responsible when they are sufficiently blameworthy in causing the harm or committing the wrong = we blame those who have control over their actions (committing a crime is a mental process) * MR is the guilty mind. Note that it is not necessarily a moral/culpable judgment‚ and there can be involuntary MR e.g.
Premium Criminal law Reasonable person Tort
Based on the quote “Authentic patriotism is not about you‚ what you believe or what you think is right. . . . Authentic patriotism is not an opinion. It is an action‚” by Stephen Kieran. He thinks actions mean more than opinions‚ and I completely agree‚ how are you going to expect people to believe or know your opinions if you aren’t showing them? For example if someone said reading books is good for you‚ yet they never read no one is going to believe they think that way. It’s funny how many people
Premium Thought Psychology Mind