firm’s bond‚ Johanna only used the interest expense of the year divided by the average debt balance‚ which fully ignored the discounted cash flow of the cost of debt. 2. If you do not agree with Cohen’s analysis‚ calculate your own WACC for Nike and be prepared to justify your assumptions. Combining the analysis above‚ we now give our own WACC calculation as following: 2.1 The value of debt(based on EXIHIBIT 3). Since the book value of debt may represent the market value‚ we merely
Premium Weighted average cost of capital
BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION CASE STUDY – NIKE CSR (page 70) 1. In referring to the opening profile and the closing for this chapter‚ discuss the challenges regarding corporate social responsibility that companies in the apparel industry face in its supply chains around the world? Answer: There are 5 challenges related to CSR: a. Lack of awareness and benefit of CSR In fact‚ many of companies have little knowledge about CSR. In some cases‚ companies may have a greater understanding of CSR
Premium Corporate social responsibility Management Business
ignored.) C8: Using CAPM: KE’=3.2%+0.91*5.5%=8.21% C9: Using DGM formula: P’=D1/ (KE’-g) =1.06*(1+8%)/(8.21%-8%)=$545 In Nike’s case‚ when Joanna Cohen calculated the WACC of Nike‚ she made several mistakes and led to a wrong estimate of the cost of capital. The first mistake comes to the book value of equity used in calculating WD. Nike became a publicly traded company since December 2‚ 1980‚ the share price has changed significantly during 20-year’s time. So‚ the market value of equity should be used
Premium Weighted average cost of capital Stock market Stock
Howard V. Perlmutter (1985)‚ "Strategic Planning for a Global Business‚" Columbia Journal of World Business‚ 20 (2)‚ 3-10. DeTienne‚ Kristen and Lee Lewis (2005)‚ "The Pragmatic and Ethical Barriers to Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: The Nike Case‚" Journal of Business Ethics‚ 60 (4)‚ 359-376. Devlin‚ Godfrey and Mark Bleackley (1988)‚ "Strategic Alliances--Guidelines for Success‚" Long Range Planning‚ 21 (5)‚ 18-23. Dussauge‚ Pierre and Bernard Garrette (1999)‚ Cooperative Strategy: Competing
Premium Harvard Business School Strategic management Case study
Nike is a major publicly traded sportswear‚ footwear and equipment supplier based in the US which was founded in 1962 originally know as Blue Ribbon Sports. Nike is the world leader in the manufacturing of sportswear and gear with more than 47 market shares across the global (Nike.com‚ 2011). Nike produces a wide range of sports equipments such as running shoes‚ sportswear‚ football‚ basketball‚ tennis‚ golf‚ etc. Now Nike follows the global fashion trends and is well known and popular in the
Premium Marketing Athletic shoe Nike, Inc.
Nike Athletic Shoe Industry {draw:frame} ”It is one of the most recognized symbols in the world-The swoosh. Simple.Fluid.Fast.” (Nike.com) III. Overview of the Company and Brand A. Internal Analysis Company Overview: Marketing Strategy of Brand a. Brand description‚ product line overview classification Nike carries a wide selection of all kinds of athletic shoes. Running shoes‚ basketball shoes‚ casual shoes‚ trail shoes‚ and cross trainer shoes. Nike tends to be more on the expensive
Premium Nike, Inc. Athletic shoe
Marketing Excellence / Nike Question 1: What are the pros‚ cons and risks associated with Nike’s core marketing strategy ? We can evaluate Nike’s core marketing strategy as related them to the relevant marketing theories. First of them is distribution theory. Nike distributes its products on different level basis. The high quality products are given to a certain distributers while the low price to be sold at highly discounted price at the retail stores such as Wal-Mart. Nike has also become the leader
Premium Marketing
h4By amoooora Studymode.com/h4 Running head NIKE‚ Inc. Mission‚ Vision‚ Principlesspan classtab/span1br /br / br /br / NIKE‚ Inc. Mission‚ Vision‚ Principles br /br / Ameirah Aldahmanibr /br / MSM631 ndash Strategic Management and Financial Reports Analysis Regis Universitybr /br / Saturday‚ September 04‚ 2010br /br / br /br / Abstractbr /br / span classtab/spanThis paper is a qualitative and quantitative analysis of NIKE‚ Inc.‚ done as six separate sections. The six sections
Premium Sustainability
Nike Ethics Nike Incorporated is the number one leading sportswear and equipment provider in the world. They manufacture anything from casual clothes to sports equipment‚ shoes to socks‚ and basketballs to golf balls. As a result of its massive success‚ Nike employs nearly 30‚000 people worldwide while manufacturing in 700 shops around the globe and has 45 offices outside the United States. Its extensive reach into the global market has Nike producing more exclusive products than any other
Premium Ethics Bill Bowerman Minimum wage
Nike Sweatshops Nike is the largest seller of athletic footwear and apparel in the world. The company is primarily engaged in the design‚ development‚ and worldwide marketing of footwear‚ apparel‚ equipment and accessories. The company operates in the US‚ Europe‚ Asia Pacific‚ the Middle East and Africa. It is headquartered in Beaverton‚ Oregon. (Datamonitor‚ 2006‚ p 4) By shifting manufacturing to developing countries‚ Nike is able to achieve significant cost savings owing to the lower
Premium Corporate social responsibility Sweatshop Social responsibility