dependent upon the situation. In this paper‚ I will discuss theory based arguments to justify my disagreement with Goodman’s contention. When considering the theories of right and wrong‚ it is customary to think of them as absolute. If it’s wrong‚ it can’t be right or if it’s right‚ it can’t be wrong. It is only when we stop looking at these theories as absolutes that we can begin to explore the possibilities of moral‚ subjective and cultural relativity. I submit that a person’s actions are only
Premium Truth Belief Morality
In the second article Ruth Benedict argues the theory of Moral Relativism. Benedict describes her theory by arguing three main points: Modern civilization is not necessarily the pinnacle of human achievement‚ normality is culturally defined‚ and normality is often associated by the term “good”. To argue that modern civilization
Premium Herodotus History Achaemenid Empire
I believe that virtue ethics is the most plausible ethical theory. It is the only theory that requires us to work better ourselves by cultivating virtues instead of giving a law to follow or because we value the outcomes. In addition‚ with today’s society being self-centered it is the theory that has the best chances of being accepted. A virtue is defined as the mean between the extremely good and extremely bad and arriving to that just middle take time‚ dedication‚ and patience. One does not own
Premium Ethics Morality Virtue
Law and Ethics essay For the purpose of this assignment I will look at the legal and ethical aspects involved in the following scenario and this will be discussed. I will take into consideration both the deontological and consequentialism theory. Laws relevant to this scenario will be looked at. Scenario To maintain confidentiality the name of the patient has been changed. The patient D is 60 years old male who had kidney cancer he had been admitted to the hospital for further treatment. On
Premium Ethics Physician Patient
Past‚ Present‚ Future Basic Human Nature – Evil‚ Neutral/Mixed‚ Good Activity Orientation – Being‚ Contain/Control‚ Doing Relationships among People – Ind. Group‚ Hierarchical Space Orientation – Private‚ Mixed‚ Public Hofstede’s Dimensions of Cultural Values (1980‚ 2001) – work-related values Individualism / collectivism Low / High Power Distance Weak / Strong Uncertainty Avoidance Masculinity / Femininity (Mas – tough‚ value of success‚ money; Fem – tender‚ personal relationship‚ care) The
Premium Motivation Maslow's hierarchy of needs Sociology
Ethic Theories on Gay Marriage Outline 1. Introduction 2. History of Gay Marriage a. First Gays to sue for right to marry b. 1991 Hawaii ban on Gay Marriage c. Vermont’s Stance on Gay Marriage d. Gay Marriage is the responsibility of the states 3. Utilitarian View e. Best for the Majority f. Who is the Majority 4. Relativism g. Cultural views h. Benefits to gay marriage 5. Which Theory do I fit into 6. Conclusion
Premium Homosexuality Marriage Same-sex marriage
ultimately subjective‚ as our perceptions of cultural differences are shaped largely by our immersion in our own culture. An ethnocentric approach stems from judging an alternate culture in relation to one’s own pre-conceived cultural values‚ held to be superior; the parallax phenomenon‚ the inability to escape our own biases‚ prevents objective analysis of different cultures. A cultural relativist maintains the post-modernist view that there is no moral or cultural high-ground with which to judge one culture
Premium Culture Cultural relativism Anthropology
Professor Submitted by: Bigtacion‚ Anne Czarina D. IV-20 BSE Social Science Semester II 2012-2013 November 20‚ 2012 MULTICULTURAL EDUCATION (A Development in Education) I. INTRODUC TION In a world experiencing rapid change‚ and where cultural‚ political‚ economic and social upheaval challenges traditional ways of life‚ education has a major role to play in promoting social cohesion and peaceful coexistence. Through programs that encourage discussion between students of different cultures
Free Culture Multiculturalism Education
Assess Rachels’ critique of the main argument for normative cultural relativism (NCR)‚ i.e.‚ the Cultural Differences Argument. How might a proponent of NCR respond to Rachels critique? Is the response effective? Why or why not? In this essay‚ I will discuss James Rachels’ article “The Challenge of Cultural Relativism”‚ in which he criticizes the normative cultural relativism argument which is about how different cultures have different moral codes‚ thus there is no single
Premium Morality Cultural relativism Culture
ETHICAL PRINCIPLES/THEORIES Situation Ethics o Situation ethics views Pornography as moral if and only if it is used in moderation and with the right mind set of the individual to use it to benefit oneself or others in a good way. A married couple who are unable to show their love to each other can use a type of pornography called “cybersex” to help them cope up with the loneliness of being away from their loved one. o But if an individual indulges his/herself into pornography to harm
Premium Morality Sexual intercourse Ethics