A whistleblower is a person who tells the public or someone in authority about alleged dishonest or illegal activities. However‚ Sharron Watkins only blew the whistle internally and so did not do everything she was morally required do as Vice President of Corporate Development for Enron. 1. Sharron Watkins ignored the first signs of fraud in a selfish pursuit to develop her own career. When first warning signs of fraud happened in 1996 Watkins protested against them to higher management however
Premium Kenneth Lay Accounting scandals Morality
LLM CANON LAW 2nd year Essay 4. What is the civil law on abortion and is this at odds with the Roman Catholic canon law? Introduction The word abortion comes from the Latin ’aboriri’ meaning to miscarry‚ where pregnancy ends too soon and the baby dies. The Abortion debate has become one of the most divisive and contentious issues of our time. Garlikov is of the opinion that once those for or against abortion reflect with more rationality‚they will discover
Premium Common law Abortion Law
Aquinas’ Five Proofs What real evidence can be supplied for God’s existence? St. Thomas‚ in his Summa Theologica‚ sets forth five separate proofs for the existence of God‚ Unlike St. Anselm’s proof‚ which deals with pure concepts‚ St. Thomas’ proofs rely on the world of our experience-what we can see around us. In these proofs we can easily see the influence of Aristotle and his doctrine of the Four Causes. l) The Proof from Motion. We observe motion all around us. Whatever is in motion now
Premium Ontology Existence of God Existence
Ryan Horler What arguments are presented in the Crito for the conclusion that Socrates would be acting unjustly if he escaped from prison and evaded his sentence? Do you find them convincing? The Platonic ’Death of Socrates Dialogues’‚ are a quartet of important and influential conversations written by Plato‚ but told through the eyes of his mentor Socrates. Written in 386BC‚ they tell the story surrounding the Socrates being charged by the state for piety and corruption of the youth
Premium Plato Political philosophy Socrates
3.1 The Incompatibility Argument: Relational Understanding of Self According to Roger Ames‚ “transplanting” human rights to China was doomed to failure because of the incompatibility between Chinese values and the Western human rights concept.36 Historically‚ he argues‚ the concept of rights did not naturally evolve in China‚ which leads him to portray Western human rights efforts as imperialistic. Indeed‚ the Western concepts of “rights” may indeed have posed a problem for Chinese society‚ when
Premium China People's Republic of China United States
the most controversial cases in American law is Roe v Wade‚ a decision impacting abortion laws in America. In the case‚ the Supreme Court ruled that a woman has a right to have an abortion anytime in the first trimester and can have an abortion in the second trimester under stricter conditions regarding the facility the abortion is performed in and the physician who performs the procedure. The decision angered many states because they previously had laws prohibiting abortion because many people
Premium Abortion Abortion debate Roe v. Wade
Among Immanuel Kant’s (1724–1804) most influential contributions to philosophy is his development of the transcendental argument. In Kant’s conception‚ an argument of this kind begins with a compelling premise about our thought‚ experience‚ or knowledge‚ and then reasons to a conclusion that is a substantive and unobvious presupposition and necessary condition of this premise. The crucial steps in this reasoning are claims to the effect that a subconclusion or conclusion is a presupposition and necessary
Premium Logic Metaphysics Immanuel Kant
felony capital murder but became insane while in prison. "Medicine is supposed to heal people‚ not prepare them for execution; a law that asks doctors to make people well so that the government can kill them is an absurd law‚" said David Kaczynski‚ the executive director of New Yorkers Against the Death Penalty . There are many arguments in this passage. The first argument is this passage is “medicine is supposed to heal people‚ not prepare them for execution”. The premise is “medicine is supposed
Premium Capital punishment Prison Capital punishment in the United States
writing. First‚ I will explicate Pascal’s argument that believing in God is a bet. Then‚ I will argue that Pascal was right when he stated that one must choose whether to believe in God by proving that believing in God is a forced and unavoidable belief. In arguing for Pascal’s wager‚ which I will break down into two groups of assumptions‚ I will show that believing in God is the best bet independent of the existence of God or an afterlife. In his argument‚ Pascal first compares God’s existence to
Premium Existence Atheism Existence of God
of what this bill proposes and how it changes existing law; why was this bill proposed? (you may speculate if the reason isn’t apparent) 1a.) Missouri House Bill HB 2081 establishes “Laura’s Law” which specifies that any social host who furnishes a minor with intoxicating liquor found to be a contributing cause of resulting permanent personal injuries or death will be guilty of a class D felony. This law changes the dynamics of any old law (alcohol-related traffic offenses‚ with penalty provisions)
Premium Logic Mothers Against Drunk Driving The Bill