Peer Review Worksheet Part of your responsibility as a student in this course is to provide quality feedback to your peers that will help them to improve their writing skills. This worksheet will assist you in providing that feedback. Please use it for each review that you perform throughout the course. Please copy and paste the completed Review into your reply to the post containing the assigned draft. Please do not post your Review as an attachment. Name of
Premium Writing Peer review Answer
Axia College Material Appendix I Currency Conversion Development Assignment—Flowcharts Complete the flowcharts for the assignment above by typing into the textboxes below. Week 4 IT/210 Control Flow Diagram—Main Control ------------------------------------------------- Begin You are entering the currency converter Quit ? You are exiting the currency converter Get user input Yes No Calculate Foreign currency to dollars Display equal value U.S dollar amount
Premium United States dollar Currency Dollar
IT 210-Final Currency Conversion Program Florence Sanders IT/210 Fundamentals of Programming with Algorithms and Logic September 16‚ 2012 Ed Addison Application-Level Requirements List 1. User screen that prompts user 2. Display prompts main user title screen 3. Main user screen provides short description explaining use of program 4. Calculations of currency is executed with valid inputs 5. Provides option to clear input fields Input | Process | Output |
Premium United States dollar Canadian dollar Currency
Program Material Appendix I Currency Conversion Development Assignment—Flowcharts Complete the flowcharts for the assignment by typing into the textboxes below. Control Flow Diagram—Main Control ------------------------------------------------- Begin Do you want to quit? Quit ? Provide exit message Display Menu Yes No Convert Currency Display_Results End Begin Do you want to quit? Quit ? Provide exit message Display Menu Yes No Convert Currency Display_Results End -------------------------------------------------
Premium Currency United States dollar Pound sterling
When a person tries to review or change their own creations it can be difficult and often useless. When someone writes something‚ no matter how impersonal it is‚ they become attached and biased. Due to the lack of efficiency in correcting our own mistakes we turn to those closest to us to point our flaws‚ our peers. From my experience peer reviews are usually halfhearted comments about a paper you do not care about in order to complete an assignment. However‚ the peer review I received and gave for
Premium Writing Essay Management
Please put “Peer Review” at the top of your posting so I will see it and give you credit for it when I am grading. List your peer’s name. Answer: What was your favorite part of her/his comments? Did he/she cite the textbook if appropriate? Evaluate his/her use of online resources. (Check the website links to see if the links work and are on topic. Did your peer explain how the website was relevant to the discussion topic?) Evaluate the
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution Freedom of speech United States Constitution
Axia College Material Appendix G Peer Review Checklist* What is the main point of this paper? Whether video games are good or bad for people‚ and how popular this industry really is. What is the greatest strength of this paper? I enjoyed the way the author has all of his research in such great order. His numbers and statistics help explain what he/she is writing about. The graphs are also very informative. The author studied the subject very well. What material does not seem to
Premium Writing English-language films Research
Axia College Material Appendix G Peer Review Checklist* |What is the main point of this paper? | | | | | | |The main point of this paper is to inform the audience about gun control. | |
Premium Peer review Firearm Gun politics
u09a1 Unit 9 Assignment Summary of Peer- Reviewed Article A NEW QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO MEASURE PERCEIVED WORK-RELATED STRESS IN ITALIAN EMPLOYEES By Cevenini‚ G.‚ Fratini‚ I.‚ & Gambassi‚ R. (2012) Cevenini‚ Fratini‚ and Gambassi (2012) goal was to give accurate quantification of what participants perceived occupational stress to be. Their study is a new quantitative approach of questionnaire data collection and analysis. They chose a statistical multivariate procedure. Their aim
Premium Principal component analysis Factor analysis Statistics
Peer Review Worksheet Your Name Writer’s Name: Read the essay completely once. Then‚ read it again taking all of the following into consideration. Be honest‚ constructive‚ and appropriate in your comments Read objectively Do not offer comments like “Cool‚” Great‚” “I liked it‚” or anything else that does not include a scholarly explanation or justification for the comment Feedback is important‚ especially at this critical first stage Help your classmate think outside the box; does what you
Premium Writing Pleading Lawsuit