POSITION PAPER Committee: GA fourth committee- Special‚ Political and Decolonization (SPECPOL) Topic: The question of self determination for non- sovereign regions seeking to exercise substantial autonomy- The Kashmir story. Country: Sudan Delegate: Divya Shetty‚ Manipal University The Kashmir dispute dates from 1947. The partition of the Indian sub-continent along religious lines led to the formation of India and Pakistan. Because of its location‚ Kashmir could choose to join either
Premium Kashmir Kashmir conflict Jammu and Kashmir
What exactly was covered in the great Patent Trial of the Century between Apple and Samsung? I’ve had a surprisingly hard time figuring this out. However‚ after reading the verdict‚ the patents themselves‚ and a bunch of news summaries‚ it seems to me that there may be less than meets the eye here. As near as I can tell‚ the jury found Samsung guilty of violating the following Apple patents: Patent 381‚ which covers inertial scrolling (the faster you move your finger‚ the faster a list scrolls)
Premium Apple Inc. Jury Invention
examines the adaptation of the customer personality and brand personality and the effect of it on Attitudinal and behavioural loyalty and brand equity in the mobile phone industry in Tehran. Sample of study is 400 actual and potential customers of Samsung mobile in Tehran. The results show that adoption of brand personality and personality traits improve attitude and behavioural loyalty brand and brand equity. Keywords: Consumer Personality Trait‚ Brand Personality‚ Brand Loyalty‚ Brand Equity DOI:10
Premium Brand Personality psychology Big Five personality traits
copypasted The Samsung was founded by Byung-Chull Lee in 1938. First it started up with selling fish‚ vegetables and fruit to china. However‚ it was a success and became a co-operation in 1951. Moreover‚ Samsung began to expand they are business in financial‚ media‚ chemicals and ship building throughout the 1970’s. As a result‚ from 1958 onwards Samsung was recognised in making Televisions‚ Mobile phones‚ Radio’s‚ Computer components and other electronic devices‚ but in 1997 Samsung were dragged in
Premium Smartphone Mobile phone
Legal Case Review Apple vs. Samsung by Michel Andreas Kroeze BIA512 A legal case review submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of BACHELOR OF ARTS IN INTERACTIVE ANIMATION At SAE Institute Amsterdam 29/04/2013 Word count: 4332 Table of contents 1. Legal Case Front page……………………………………………………………………..3 2. The Parties………………………………………………………………………………….4 3. The Lawsuit……………………………………………………………………...………....6 4. Apple’s Arguments ………………………………………………………………..………9
Premium Apple Inc. App Store Steve Jobs
SAMSUNG From its inception as a small export business in Taegu‚ Korea‚ Samsung has grown to become one of the world’s leading electronics companies‚ specializing in digital appliances and media‚ semiconductors‚ memory‚ and system integration. Today Samsung’s innovative and top quality products and processes are world recognized. Samsung is part of the fabric of our lives. As a global leader Samsung are at the forefront of change‚ anticipating today what its customers around the world will want tomorrow
Premium Business ethics Ethics Morality
promotion Samsung Products: Samsung have a list of products that are high in demand across more economically developed countries due to the fact that Samsung’s products are considered luxury items so they will cost a lot more‚ this is why there products are mainly sold in more economically developed countries because only people in economically developed countries can afford their products. Also Samsung’s products are considered very popular amongst the working class as the Samsung galaxy S3 over
Premium Mobile phone South Korea Smartphone
SAMSUNG VS APPLE-BATTLE OF THE GIANTS Samsung and Apple are the two biggest smartphone companies with a combined market share of more than half the global smartphone market. Every year both the companies bring in new innovations in their smartphones‚ which greatly increases their smartphone sales. But in today’s market where there is cut throat competition it is given that each company will try to outdo the other in every possible manner. Hence I would like to discuss the fierce battle raging
Premium Apple Inc. Smartphone Mobile phone
Capital Structure : Samsung and Intel 1 | | Samsung Electronics | | Intel | | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | Assets | 32‚035 | 24‚105 | 29‚178 | | 28‚880 | 31‚471 | 43‚849 | Liabilities | 27‚386 | 19‚016 | 16‚004 | | 9‚585 | 8‚094 | 11‚314 | Shareholders’ Equity | 4‚649 | 5‚089 | 13‚174 | | 19‚295 | 23‚377 | 32‚535 | | | | | | | | | Debt/Equity | 5.89 | 3.74 | 1.21 | | 0.50 | 0.35 | 0.35 | Debt/Capitalization | 0.85 | 0.79 | 0.55 | | 0.33 | 0.26 |
Premium Debt Finance Currency
Porter’s 5 forces analysis Potential entrants (threat) Samsung as mobile company is not even frightened of new entrants‚ because the capital needed to invest in this kind of industry is extremely high‚ which means that no too many investors try to gain a market share in mobile environment. BIBLIOGRAPHY \l 2058 This kind of threat is very low‚ with a high invest in R&D for the creation and innovation of unique products that exceed the consumer’s expectations and brand loyalty of their mobile
Premium Mobile phone Smartphone Motorola