Miracle creations enterprise’– partnership between sellers sold plastic balls for 7 days in the informal economy. The enterprise had seed capital of Rs 100‚ the discussions held before starting its business tried to find the market for an innocuous commodity. In Crawford market- the place from where the commodity was procured‚ the oligopolistic sellers there followed price rigidity. So‚ the enterprise inspite of having inelastic demand for plastic balls (for 7 days) the enterprise has to pay a fixed
Premium Welfare economics Economics Cost
TO: Dr. Jian Cao‚ ACG Professor FROM: Andre Smith‚ MBA Candidate DATE: November 17‚ 2014 SUBJECT: BuyGasCo Case Analysis Introduction The BuyGasCo Corporation (BuyGasCo) case calls into question which costing approach is appropriate in determining whether or not BuyGasCo is guilty of predatory pricing. In determining BuyGasCo’s guilt‚ it should be noted that they have been historically known to provide low prices to its customers. BuyGasCo is a retail fuel and service chain center that has
Premium Cost Costs Cost-benefit analysis
to handle the employees that start using the intranet each month. I picked this case because it resembles the types of problems that I faced during my summer internship at The CocaCola Company. One of my responsibilities was to assist in the cost analysis of a large software implementation. Different departments would go live in different weeks and I had to cost out the different implementation strategies. At the time‚ I did not know what went into the decision making process for different strategies
Premium Costs Optimization Mathematical optimization
Time: 1.30 – 4.30pm INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES Answer FOUR questions. All questions carry equal marks. FOR THIS PAPER CANDIDATES ARE PROVIDED WITH: • • Answer book Appendix A An A3 drawing of the proposed development. A cost analysis of a similar project (BCIS ref: A-1-1631). The BCIS All-in Tender Price Index. BCIS Location Factors. Continued ………. 1 BSc (Hons) CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT YEAR 1FT/SW BSc (Hons) CIVIL ENGINEERING AND QUANTITY SURVEYING YEAR 1 FT/SW
Premium Civil engineering Construction Architect
13130000 crore of which equity participation would be Tk. 12180000 crore (92.76 %) and the rest of will be Bank loan. Debt – Equity Ratio: – 7. 24 : 92.76 7. Profitability & Result of Financial Analysis : The year – wise operating profit of the project on completion and the results of financial analysis are shown as follows : Tk. In ‘000 1st yr Net Profit
Premium Variable cost Costs Fixed cost
survey proposed and design therein 50 trips for the 20 larger projects only while 110 trips for the 100 smaller projects. One complicated thing was data collection for smaller projects because smaller projects was more than larger so in this way analysis and report preparation was too difficult for smaller projects. According to exhibit 3‚ the statistics shows that 20 larger projects
Premium Income Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Revenue
PAPER F5 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT P R A C T I C E & R E V I S I O N K I T In this January 2010 new edition We discuss the best strategies for revising and taking your ACCA exams We show you how to be well prepared for your exam We give you lots of great guidance on tackling questions We show you how you can build your own exams We provide you with three mock exams including the December 2009 exam We provide the ACCA examiner ’s answers as well as our own to the June and December 2009 exams as
Premium Cost accounting Management accounting Costs
PMP® Formula Pocket Guide Print it - Fold it - Study wherever you go. Earned Value CV = EV - AC CPI = EV / AC SV = EV - PV SPI = EV / PV EAC ‘no variances’ = BAC / CPI EAC ‘fundamentally flawed’ = AC + ETC EAC ‘atypical’ = AC + BAC - EV EAC ‘typical’ = AC + ((BAC - EV) / CPI) ETC = EAC - AC ETC ‘atypical’ = BAC - EV ETC ‘typical’ = (BAC - EV) / CPI ETC ‘flawed’ = new estimate Percent Complete = EV / BAC * 100 VAC = BAC - EAC EV = % complete * BAC Mathematical Basics Average (Mean) = Sum
Premium Net present value Cost-benefit analysis Depreciation
Ford Pinto - Executive Summary MGT216 12/06/2010 Executive Summary Ford Motor Company introduced the Ford Pinto into the consumer market place and the end result was profit over human life. Ford Motor Company analyzed the cost of replacing an inexpensive part and found that it was cheaper to pay for suits resulting in accidental deaths and injuries. This summary will provide details and the factors surrounding the Ford Pinto case‚ the results of the production of the car and how Ford
Premium Ford Motor Company Ford Pinto Station wagon
13-4 Mercedes-Benz All Activity Vehicle (AAV) During the recession beginning in the early 1990s‚ Mercedes-Benz (MB) struggled with product development‚ cost efficiency‚ material purchasing and problems in adapting to changing markets. In 1993‚ these problems caused the worst sales slump in decades‚ and the luxury carmaker lost money for the first time in its history. Since then‚ MB has streamlined the core business‚ reduced parts and system complexity‚ and established simultaneous engineering
Premium Cost Costs Cost overrun