Not only was the weak leadership of Tsar Nicholas II the main cause of the 1917 February revolution‚ but it can also be seen as a factor leading to the 1905 revolution.The Tsar’s inadequate handling of this revolution failed to prevent another revolution and gives evidence to his poor leadership. Nicholas did not learn anything from the 1905 revolution and failed to realise his people would not sit by and suffer. In the early 1900s Russia was in turmoil. The country was stricken by poverty‚ food
Premium Russia Russian Empire Vladimir Lenin
weaker parts of Indian society ie agricultural labourers‚ marginal and small farmers. It already boasts one of the highest unemployment rates‚ and despite its agricultural success‚ farmers livelihoods have been declining resulting in a record number of farmer suicides. The various reasons‚ for suicides among Punjab farmers is perturbing enough to warrant a serious study. In the present case‚ suicide among Punjab farmers have by all means become a public issue as these are no longer confined to isolated
Premium Suicide The Complete Manual of Suicide
Was Tsar Nicholas II mainly to blame for the 1905 Revolution? In 1905‚ the social and economic tensions building up within Russia boiled over into Revolution. It was described by Lenin as the “Great Dress Rehearsal” for the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917 and may give us clues as to why the 1917 revolution started. The suggestion that Tsar Nicholas II and his actions were to blame for this revolution is debatable and there are many factors such as the repressive Tsarist system‚ the growth of opposition
Premium Russia Russian Empire Nicholas II of Russia
PEASANTS AND FARMERS Q1.Explain what the open field system meant to rural people in 18th century in England from the point of view of (a) A rich man (b) A labourer (c) A peasant women. Ans: Open field system Before the 18th century in large parts of England the country side was open‚ it was not partitioned into enclosed lands privately owned by landlords. Peasants: They cultivated strips of land around the village they lived in. Mixed quality of land: At the beginning f each
Premium Agriculture Opium Wars Opium
mistakes. The House of Romanov is not at all exempt from this and especially not Nicholas Romanov II‚ the last Tsar of Russia. Nicholas the Second made many mistakes but also had plenty of successes during his reign. His family life was brought heavily into light during his reign aswell due to their involvement in the political aspects of the country. Russia has been apart of a multitude of battles and even wars. Nicholas had many of them during his time as the Tsar as well. There was the Russo-Japanese
Premium Russia Russian Empire Soviet Union
ready to be Tsar. I know nothing of the business of ruling.” Even though Nicholas was heir to the throne his father‚ Alexander III had not prepared him for the Tsardom of Russia; he was in no way ready to rule. Once in charge‚ Nicholas met Alexandra Feodorovna (Princess Alix Viktoria Helene Luise Beatrix of Hesse and by Rhine) and in 1894 the two were married at the Grand Church of the Winter Palace. Even though Nicholas II was hardworking‚ he was an introverted‚ deeply religious‚ and solitary man;
Premium Russia Russian Empire Nicholas II of Russia
What role did Nicholas II play in his own downfall? Nicholas II played‚ by far the biggest role in his downfall as the Tsar of Russia. Certain aspects of his behaviour definitely contributed to bringing down the Russian empire‚ however most of these qualities were not weaknesses in character but qualities associated with poor leadership. By weakness‚ I mean being easily influenced and controlled by others. Nicholas was a firm believer in autocracy and was virtually unmoveable in this belief. This
Free Russian Empire Nicholas II of Russia World War I
Essay On Nicholas Romanov "Nicholas Romanov was an ignorant‚ incompetent and insensitive leader. His character was the decisive factor in bringing on the revolution" "The last Tsar of Russia was a tragic figure a classic case of being a leader in the wrong place at the wrong time. Nothing within his power could have prevented the forces of change from overtaking Tsarist Russia." To what extent do you agree with these explanations of the collapse of autocracy in Russia? Nicholas Romanov
Premium Nicholas II of Russia Russia Russian Empire
D3 5. How far was Nicholas II responsible for the fall of the Romanovs in 1917? Nicholas II being the last tsar of the Romanov dynasty that lasted for over 300 years‚ is accountable for the fall of the Romanovs in 1917‚ however‚ there are various other reasons too that involved in the ultimate fall of tsarism in Russia in February 1917. While Nicholas’s indecisiveness played a major role in portraying his negligence‚ the other factors that involved the fall of tsarism were‚ the declining economic
Premium Russia Russian Empire Nicholas II of Russia
better prices‚ exploitation by Middlemen‚ all of which have led to a series of suicidescommitted by farmers across India. • • • • Farmers’ demands were not taken into account while preparing the relief package. Neither were civil society organisations‚ local government bodies‚ panchayats etc. consulted. • The relief packages were mostly amalgamations of existing schemes. Apart from the farmer helpline and the direct financial assistance‚ there was scarcely anything new being offered. Pumping
Free Agriculture Government Poverty