The concept of self identifies the essence of one’s very being. It implies continuous existence having no other exact equal‚ i.e. the one and only. Whether or not the specific characteristic(s) used to define self are objectively real‚ i.e. physical attributes‚ or purely subjective‚ i.e. imaginary traits‚ the concept makes distinct one entity from another. Rationalism is the theory that truth can be derived through use of reason alone. Empiricism‚ a rival theory‚ asserts that truth must be established
Premium Perception Mind Rationalism
Prathyusha Guduru In the history of philosophy‚ two of the most prominent philosophers were Hobbes and Hume. Both made important contributions to the world of ethics. One of the main important things they differed on is reason. Hobbs felt that reason is way to seek peace but Hume felt the reason is only a slave to passions. In the following paragraphs‚ you will see how Hobbes and Hume explain their different views on reason the theories of the two philosophers are analyzed in depth‚ so that
Premium Philosophy Social contract Thomas Hobbes
modern philosopher‚ David Hume‚ argued that the proof of self existence was not possible. Hume stated‚ “If any impression gives rise to the idea of self‚ that impression must continue invariably the same‚ through the whole course of our lives; since self is supposed to exist after that manner” (Kolack and Thompson 642). Although Hume made some valid arguments‚ his views on self existence are both wrong and arrogant. The existence of self can be‚ and has been‚ proven. David Hume proposed the Bundle
Premium Mind John Locke Soul
Explain Hume’s views on miracles. Hume believed we establish cause and effect relationships based on our experience of this world which leads us to make predictions about what will happen in similar cases in the future. To Hume a miracle is a transgression of the laws of nature caused by God or by some form of invisible agent. He uses a priori reasoning supporting this with a number of sub-arguments designed to discredit testimonies regarding miracles. He argued that miracles cannot exist
Premium Logic Scientific method Inductive reasoning
Descartes VS Hume René Descartes and David Hume touched upon epistemology on the same question‚ “where does human knowledge come from?” They both came to very different conclusions. Descartes claimed that our knowledge came from human reasoning alone and this is an absolute certainty principle. This faculty of reasoning is innate tool that came with human species. He called this tool‚ “mind‚” which is separated from our body. Hume on the other hand‚ claimed that human learned from observing the
Premium Epistemology Cognition Empiricism
Critical Evaluation In Engaging with God David Peterson aims to provide a Biblical theological framework for worship‚ and he does just that. As he unfolds the Bible’s teachings on worship from Genesis to Revelation it is evident that the Bible is truly a book about worship. And more specifically‚ it is a book that tells those made in the image of God how they are to worship their Maker with reverent hearts and obedient hands. There are many features of this book that make it outstanding. First is
Premium Christianity New Testament Bible
In this paper I will be contrasting the moral philosophies of David Hume and Immanuel Kant. Although I will be discussing several ideas from each philosopher the main theme of my paper will be dealing with the source of morality. It is my opinion that Hume’s sentiment based‚ empirical method is more practical than the reason based‚ a priori theory of Kant. According to Kant moral law must be known a priori‚ and must be able to be universally applied to all beings. Kant asserts that empirical explanations
Premium Morality Philosophy Immanuel Kant
The Riddle of Existence Leibniz’s formulation: “Why is there something rather than nothing”‚ is perhaps one of the most important questions ever posed in Philosophy. It had taken philosophy into a level wherein ‘everything’ is included in its realm; not only abstracta but also concreta. However‚ the question is more focused on the origins and explanations of the existence of concrete objects. Aside from explaining why concrete objects exist and where they come from‚ and who/what made them; the
Premium Ontology Existence
It is not trying to prove the existence of Christian God‚ or that there is no God or no god but rather using philosophical arguments backed up by philosophers to give the top arguments on why there is something. In the tooth and nail battle of ethnicity‚ equality‚ and religion we live in today I find it interesting and commend them for making such statement. Also me being a Christian I am used to seeing Philosophy and Science used to disprove the existence of God or god‚ and found it different and
Free God Existence Theology
“Explain the argument from religious experience for the existence of God.”30 marks Expect different forms of the argument from religious experience‚ e.g. inductive argument‚ direct awareness‚ cumulative argument. Also expect reference to Swinburne’s principle of credulity and principle of testimony. Maximum Level 2 if summary of types of religious experience with no reference to argument for God. ------------------------------------------------- Level 7 for one fully developed argument‚ or two
Premium Existence Logic Philosophy of religion