William James Biography (1842-1910) By Kendra Cherry Timeline of Events: Born January 11‚ 1842 in New York City. 1869 - Received M.D. from Harvard. 1875 - Began teaching psychology at Harvard. 1882 - Death of William’s father‚ Henry James Sr. 1890 - Published The Principles of Psychology. 1892 - Turned lab over to Hugo Munsterberg. 1897 - Published Will to Believe and Other Essays 1907 - Published Pragmatism and officially resigned from Harvard
Premium William James
WILLIAM JAMES AND LIFE AFTER DEATH A. W. Orr Saybrook University San Francisco‚ CA December 12‚ 2013 2 WILLIAM JAMES AND LIFE AFTER DEATH William James’ views about life after life death can be summed up in two words‚ not proven. Over the course of his career he encountered the question repeatedly. He considered it‚ he pondered it‚ and he explored it. In the end his views did not significantly change. At the same time he found the idea fascinating and was continually intrigued
Free Life Death Afterlife
“William James and Functionalism” I. Introduction William James (January 11‚ 1842 – August 26‚ 1910) was an American philosopher and psychologist who had trained as a physician. He was the first educator to offer a psychology course in the United States. James wrote influential books on pragmatism‚ psychology‚ educational psychology‚ the psychology of religious experience‚ and mysticism. He was the brother of novelist Henry James and of diarist Alice James. In the
Premium Psychology Mind Cognitive science
turn of the nineteenth century‚ American philosopher and psychologist William James delivered a series of lectures on the topic of natural religion at the University of Edinburgh‚ which were later published as a collection under the title of The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature. Within this collection‚ one encounters a profound discussion of many multi-faceted aspects of religion. With this discussion‚ James is able to ultimately conclude that a collective religious truth does
Premium Religion William James Truth
David Hume was an early 18th century philosopher that is best known for covering a variety of theories. He covered that reason alone cannot be a motive to the will‚ moral distinctions are not derived from reason and moral distinctions are direct from the moral sentiments [Treatise of Human Nature‚ 11]. “Reason is‚ and ought only to be the slave of the passions‚ and can never pretend to any other office than to serve and obey them” [T 2.3.3 p. 414] in his work A Treatise of Human Nature. Reason
Premium Motivation Reason Adam Smith
way to attain knowledge about the world‚ empiricism concentrates fully on all knowledge being a posteriori‚ or attained through experience and sensation. In an obvious way‚ David Hume’s empiricist epistemology directly contrasted Descartes rationalism‚ specifically by how he believed humans can attain knowledge. According to Hume‚ humans understand the world by experiencing different perceptions: impressions/sensations and ideas/thoughts. The amount of force and vivacity of the perception allows humans
Premium Immanuel Kant Rationalism Empiricism
Prathyusha Guduru In the history of philosophy‚ two of the most prominent philosophers were Hobbes and Hume. Both made important contributions to the world of ethics. One of the main important things they differed on is reason. Hobbs felt that reason is way to seek peace but Hume felt the reason is only a slave to passions. In the following paragraphs‚ you will see how Hobbes and Hume explain their different views on reason the theories of the two philosophers are analyzed in depth‚ so that
Premium Philosophy Social contract Thomas Hobbes
following excerpt written by William James‚ religion plays a big role in what he is trying to portray. We are all lead by our own believes and it plays a big role into who we are‚ and will become. James states‚ “but of each man to stay in his own experience‚ whate’er it be‚ and for others to tolerate there‚ is surely best”‚ for this to be true everyone must first have faith in their believes. If the nature of men is to be guided by their own set believes or religion‚ James believes that it is best to
Premium Religion God Human
In this paper I will be contrasting the moral philosophies of David Hume and Immanuel Kant. Although I will be discussing several ideas from each philosopher the main theme of my paper will be dealing with the source of morality. It is my opinion that Hume’s sentiment based‚ empirical method is more practical than the reason based‚ a priori theory of Kant. According to Kant moral law must be known a priori‚ and must be able to be universally applied to all beings. Kant asserts that empirical explanations
Premium Morality Philosophy Immanuel Kant
The scottish philosopher David Hume says that there is a great uniformity among the actions of men in all nation and ages‚ and that human nature remains the same. Humes expresses that all men regardless of the time being all have ambition‚ self love‚ vanity‚ friendship‚ generosity‚ and public spirit. Whether it be from the times of the ancient greeks to the present the moral ethics of man never changes. I agree with David Hume because I do believe that things have remained unchanged because it is
Premium Morality Ethics Philosophy