Between 1801 and 1817‚ the two parties the Jeffersonian Republicans and Federalists seemed to have changed their views on the issue of whether the constitution should be loosely interpreted‚ or strictly interpreted. The Democratic-Republicans originally prided themselves in having strict constructionist beliefs‚ but however‚ as time went on‚ they seemed to have adopted a broader outlook. The Federalists‚ who favored a looser perspective on the interpretation of the construction‚ adopted a more strict
Premium United States Thomas Jefferson President of the United States
the idea of drafting the new constitution‚ the Anti Federalists. The other is the Federalist‚ who supported the idea. The Anti-federalists argued that the new constitution would post a threat to its people freedom and liberty. They said that the constitution would give the central government too much power‚ and at the end may ends up like their mother land‚ England. But‚ the Federalists have a totally different view on this matter. The federalists argued that
Premium Federalism United States Constitution Federation
between two opposing political philosophies during the late 1700’s. The Federalist and Anti-Federalist parties aroused at the formation and ratification of the Constitution. Both sides pointed out many arguments in order to find common ground in a governmental structure. The main conflict between the two parties revolved around the amount of power and control that the states and national government would obtain. As I am on the Federalist side‚ I support and agree to ratify the Constitution. For this will
Premium United States Constitution United States Articles of Confederation
officials and laws. Overview of the Federalists The Federalists favored a strong central government‚ policies were favorable to trade‚ finance and business. The Federalists were also in favor of national bank and favored ratification of the Constitution. The first Federalist movement was distinguished by a belief that the national government under the Articles of Confederation was too weak and that a stronger federal government was needed. The Federalists were able to get the national government
Premium Federalism United States Constitution Articles of Confederation
Federalists v. Anti-Federalists Participants in the Debate The debates over ratification of the Constitution represent the most important and intellectually sophisticated public debates in American history. On the one side‚ the supporters of the Constitution‚ or "Federalists‚" argued that the nation desperately needed a stronger national government to bring order‚ stability and unity to its efforts to find its way in an increasingly complicated world. Opponents of the Constitution‚ or "Antifederalists
Premium United States Constitution United States Congress President of the United States
The Federalists and the Anti Federalists went together like fire and ice. They always seemed to crash heads when it came to who should take power. The supporters of the proposed Constitution called themselves Federalists. They wanted a strong centered government. Unlike the Anti federalists‚ they were a diverse coalition of people who opposed ratification of the Constitution. Although less well organized than the Federalists‚ they also had an impressive group of leaders who were especially prominent
Premium United States United States Constitution President of the United States
During the Constitutional Period‚ there were two groups of people; one group called the Federalists‚ wanted a stronger national government and one group called the Anti-Federalists‚ opposed the development of a national government. The Federalists ratified the Constitution to help properly manage the debt and tensions following the American Revolution. The Anti-Federalists opposed the development of a strong federal government and the ratification of the Constitution‚ preferring instead for power
Premium
When deciding whether the Constitution better embodied the American commitment to democracy (republicanism)‚ or whether it produced a greater compromise to it‚ one must define the nature of a republican government. Both the Federalist and Anti-Federalist set forth their distinctive views on the quality of representational government‚ but it was James Madison and Alexander Hamilton vision I feel was the most correct. By accepting their view‚ it is clear that they propose the best arguments for why
Free United States Constitution Separation of powers Federalism
Federalist vs. Anti-Federalist Debate After Articles of Confederation it was seen necessary to repeal the Articles and create one that is perfect for everyone in the country‚ but it wasn’t that easy. Federalists claimed that we needed a strong central government to prevent rebellions such as Shay’s Rebellion that damaged the states while the Anti-Federalists feared that a strong central government could turn into a kingdom like U.K. which they have fought and damaged deeply‚ recently. In different
Premium Separation of powers United States Constitution Judiciary
Words: 1‚010 Pagan Heroes Antigone is a great example of a pagan hero. She is willing to lose her life by going against Creon’s proclamation and his authority in order to give her brother a proper burial. Her defense is based on obeying the Gods‚ whose eternal laws are of greater importance than her own life. She states: “Yes‚ it was not Zeus that made the proclamation; nor did justice‚ which lives with those below‚ enact such laws as that‚ for mankind.” Antigone does not believe that Creon’s
Premium Plato Hero Greek mythology