Christmas Carol” is a very famous story. It has had movies made for it. The movie version of this story is more appealing to me than the story versions of the movie has a better set of mood and is better worded than the book. This story has many similarities to the television form. The many similarities are mostly are based on the actions of a character and what they say to other characters. In the first chapter of the book has the similarity of how Scrooge locked himself in his bedroom with 2 locks
Premium
The 1977 version of “A Christmas Carol” by BBC is a very accurate rendition of the book it was based on by Charles Dickens written in 1843. This movie comes with its strengths and weaknesses‚ most of its weaknesses coming from the quality of the film production and the movie’s strengths coming from it’s striking resemblance to the earlier made novel. The short movie mirrored the book in so many ways that only really small details were left out such as Scrooge going to the tavern to get his dinner
Premium Film Film director Actor
between the movie and the book. This essay‚ hopefully‚ will answer some of those questions. The author of Rikki-Tikki-Tavi is Rudyard Kipling. The story starts with a flood that washed a mongoose out of his home. A family kindly takes him in‚ knowing he was cold and hungry. The mongoose helps to protect the family‚ and himself‚ from two evil snakes‚ who is trying to become Queen and King of the garden once more. There are many similarities and a few differences between the book and the movie such as
Premium John Steinbeck Short story Family
The movie adaptation of The Great Gatsby maintained true to the original book by F. Scott Fitzgerald. Although mostly everything seems to stay the same‚ some movie scenes differ. Nick’s character is tweaked and Gatsby’s parties are not the same. The movie also creates more false hope than the novel does. Nick Carraway is the first character introduced into the book and movie‚ but in a different aspect. F. Scott Fitzgerald introduces Nick right away as the narrator. He is giving a monologue about
Premium F. Scott Fitzgerald The Great Gatsby Jay Gatsby
Of Mice and Men: Book vs Movie -Movie starts off with a woman running away frightened‚ and then the scene changes to George and Lennie running away from men on horses‚ most likely police. They both jump in the water and avoid the men on horses. This did not happen in the book‚ but foreshadows what George tells Slim later on. -They both jump on a train‚ and then exhaustingly crawl to where they sit down. This doesn’t happen in the book. -The next scene‚ they’re in town near an employment agency
Premium Of Mice and Men English-language films Sitting
Of Mice And Men: Book vs Movie As we all know‚ there’s one thing about books that appeal to every avid reader in the world; the visualization and imagination. This is something that movies can either enrich or abolish. For the book entitled ‘Of Mice And Men’‚ the movie acted as a detriment to the book. The differences between the movie and the book are insurmountable. To start thing off‚ the first thing that was dissimilar was when George and Lennie are shown sneaking into a train at night to
Premium English-language films Of Mice and Men Film
The Reader‚ set in post-World War II Germany‚ relates the story of an SS camp guard‚ Hanna Schmitz‚ and her evolving relationship with the narrator‚ Michael Berg. Both the book and the movie deal with serious issues‚ including love and denial‚ guilt and accountability‚ and reconciliation. They both employ several subversive strategies: in presenting Michael Berg’s first love‚ it is impossible not to be sympathetic; we are drawn in. Hanna is the mysterious older woman who initiates the young boy into
Premium Fiction Character World War II
Potter: Book vs. Movie With all the new movies based on books or comics that are out‚ people wonder why Hollywood keeps doing it. Some say they’re greedy people‚ just doing it for the money‚ and others say that it helps bring the book to life. But I say‚ why ruin a good book‚ like Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone‚ with bad lighting and adequate actors? I say that we don’t have to because the comparison between the two forms of entertainment is a landslide victory for the book. You may
Free Harry Potter Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone Hogwarts
history of film making. However‚ there are certain aspects of the movie that could have been beter adapted. The main reason why these points have been missed may be due to the fact that Pier Paolo Pasolini meant to make a movie that carried a myth of the past to today and even tomorrow by starting the movie in Italy and carrying it to the past. What really bothered me while watching the movie was that Oedipus is too young compared to what we see in the tragedy and even more disturbing‚ he does not
Premium Sophocles Italy Oedipus
I like the book more than the movie. Audience reaction has to be taken into consideration in a way that books don’t have to. The audience‚ cannot‚ even for a moment‚ be confused as to who the "bad guy" is. Otherwise‚ you can have a teenage Scarface. "Moral Convenience" is what’s pissing you off. The HBO adaptation of Game of Thrones also does this. Good characters never "cross the line" where as bad guys say homophobic comments and express jealousy. This is the reason why fantasy-themed works
Premium English-language films Morality Moral