Decision Making Process . Introduction Robbins (1998: 103) states that decisions are choices made from two or more alternatives. Decisions are made as a reaction to a problem. That is‚ there is a discrepancy between the current state of affairs and some desired state requiring consideration of alternative courses of action. This however requires any person in the position where he/she must make decisions to
Premium Decision making
Democratic decision-making undermines successful management. Management‚ as defined by Meyer et al. (2007‚ p.638)‚ is ‘The planning‚ organising‚ leading and controlling of human and other resources to achieve organisational goals efficiently and effectively’. This definition portrays management as a set of process and actions‚ rather than an individual and their role as a manager. Management is a broad term‚ as there are different management styles that are used across different types of organisations
Premium Decision making Management Decision theory
differences in decision making in project teams ¨ Ralf Muller ˚ ¨ Umea School of Business‚ Malmo‚ Sweden‚ and 70 Konrad Spang and Sinan Ozcan Received 18 June 2008 Accepted 4 September 2008 Faculty for Project Management‚ University of Kassel‚ Kassel‚ Germany Abstract Purpose – The purpose of the paper is to report on research in cultural differences in decision-making styles in project teams composed of team members from different nationalities. Differences in decision making in mainly
Premium Decision making
individual decision-making would be more effective. This essay sets out to show you various examples of when and where group decision-making should be applied‚ and also show examples of when the need arises for an individual to make a decision on behalf of a group. To better understand when it is appropriate to make a group decision or when an individual should take charge‚ we must examine the various styles of group decision making. According to Davis (2001: 71-73)‚ there are four decision-making styles
Premium Decision making Decision theory
5 Major Weaknesses of Group Decision-Making INTRODUCTION Although groups can be effective tools for making decisions that affect a large percentage of stakeholders for a company‚ they are not without their weaknesses. These weaknesses can stem from poor composition of the group‚ lack of role definition or poor facilitation. The five major categories of weakness for decision-making groups are: • Slowness and expensiveness • Groupthink • Polarization • Escalating commitment
Premium Decision making Decision theory
cognitive model’ of consumer decision making process‚ in light of the arguments given in the case study: ‘Holiday decision-making: an adaptable and opportunistic ongoing process.’ Every day‚ each one of us makes various decisions regarding different aspects of our daily routine. To be able to make these decisions‚ we need to be able to have alternatives. These decisions‚ however‚ are made after doing some degree of information search but not all consumer decision-making situations receive or require
Premium Decision making Cognition
STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP AND DECISION-MAKING: ETHICS AND VALUES APRIL‚ 2010 INTRODUCTION Values and ethics are central to any organization. What exactly do we mean by values and ethics? Both are extremely broad terms‚ and we need to focus in on the aspects most relevant for strategic leaders and decision makers. What we will first discuss is the distinctive nature of ethics; second‚ we will take a look at work ethics; third we will look into strategic leadership and decision making; fourth we take a
Premium Ethics Decision making
success of an organisation. The function of the information system is to collect‚ store and process data into information‚ through the assistance of a set of interrelated components. The processed information is later distributed to support decision making in an organisation (Oz‚ 2006). Information system can be decomposed to two main elemental subsystems namely as Accounting Information System (AIS) and Management Information System (MIS). AIS mainly process financial transactions of an organisation
Premium Management Decision theory Enterprise resource planning
Running head: DECISION MAKING ANALYSIS Decision Making Analysis MGT 230 Abstract This paper discusses the decisions made by incoming CEO Anne Mulcahy. Xerox was facing massive debt and an unprofitable future. Paving a better future for Xerox‚ Mulcahy improved the company image through strategic decisions. Having twenty four years of experience at Xerox‚ Mulcahy redefined the image of Xerox and placed a plan of recovery. Decision Making Analysis Anne Mulcahy was appointed CEO to Xerox Corporation
Premium Management Xerox Decision making
Public participation in environmental decision-making is an area that will always raise questions on the relevance and of the advantages that can be gained by allowing public participation. Decision making by experts‚ which is often characterized as technocracy ’‚ is an area where experts sometimes make key decisions themselves‚ but more commonly advise policy makers and interest groups including governments and corporations. The advantages of using experts in the field are their specialist
Premium Government Decision making Decision theory