The Threat Cyber terrorism is the world’s newest threat against the United States. The FBI defines cyber terrorism as "The premeditated‚ politically motivated attack against information‚ computer systems‚ computer programs‚ and data which result in violence against noncombatant targets by sub-national groups or clandestine agents" (Elmusharaf‚ 2004). This definition provided by the FBI can be broken down into several layers. The first layer is that of the actors‚ their motives are political in
Premium Terrorism Computer Security
How Computer Forensics Works by Jonathan Strickland Computer Image Gallery Paul Howell/Getty Images Imagine how many files were retrieved from these computers on Enron ’s trading floor. See more computer pictures. When the company Enron declared bankruptcy in December 2001‚ hundreds of employees were left jobless while some executives seemed to benefit from the company ’s collapse. The United States Congress decided to investigate after hearing allegations of corporate misconduct. Much of
Premium Computer
In this essay I will be arguing against Plato’s theory of knowledge given in the Republic’s divided line. I will distinguish the differences and similarities in the epistemological concepts of Plato and Aristotle intending to explain how one comes to have knowledge and the process through which it’s obtained. As support‚ I will explain Plato’s theory of forms and Aristotle’s theory of essence because they are a direct correlation to their view of knowledge through reality. Plato’s theory of Forms
Premium Epistemology Aristotle Perception
Philosophy Homework 15/09/2011 Deductive Arguments: A deductive argument isn’t necessarily valid‚ it could be invalid. It also isn’t necessarily sound – it could be unsound. If the argument is valid and the premises are true then overall the argument is sound. You will always gain knowledge with a deductive argument. The first premise will link with the second premise in order to make a conclusion. Deductive arguments aren’t based on assumptions. Inductive Arguments: The premises are all true
Free Logic
Honors Biology January 21‚ 2013 Forensic Science In today’s age of technology‚ there are many advanced techniques detectives use to get to the root of a crime. Forensic anthropology and other sciences are key to finding the true cause of a person’s death. Without forensics‚ solving crimes would be very difficult because of the lack of evidence from various sources. Some biologists are specially trained and educated in molecular biology and can study a person’s DNA (Ferlini 17). Identifying
Premium CSI: Crime Scene Investigation Forensic science Sherlock Holmes
protective clothing which are used to reduce the risk of bringing materials from other locations to the scene of the crime. 2.2.1 Locard’s exchange principle. In forensic science‚ Locard’s principle holds that the perpetrator of a crime will bring something into the crime scene and leave with something from it‚ and that both can be used as forensic evidence 2.2.2 When a person is arrested‚ is not just standing in front of the judge and being convicted‚ there should be
Premium Criminal law Forensic evidence Bloodstain pattern analysis
Although we will be focusing on the forensic sciences that typically take place in a crime laboratory‚ there are other types of forensic sciences that are specialized and focused on a particular area. In this section‚ we will briefly take a look at some of these specialty areas. Forensic Pathology/Biology Pathology is a science that deals with disease. Pathologists make use of autopsies to study the tissues and other parts of the human body for diseases. An autopsy is a dissection and examination
Premium Forensic science Forensic pathology Death
Week 2 Discussion 1 Deductive Language Construct a deductive argument that is valid but not sound. Then‚ construct a valid deductive argument that is sound. Be sure to put the argument in premise-conclusion form. Discussion 2 Inductive Language Construct an inductive argument for a specific conclusion. Then‚ explain what you might do to make this inductive argument stronger‚ either by revising the premises or by revising the conclusion. Week 1 Discussion 1 Consider an argument
Premium Logic Argument Inductive reasoning
Forensic Science lecture 4 – 17/01/2013 Quiz: quiz after every 2 weeks‚ done through bb‚ posted midnight Sunday 12‚ close midnight Monday at 12. Video watched through class‚ Guest speaker: Heather Shacker – forensic biologist * biology section: identify of body fluids: blood‚ semen saliva‚ and DNA analysis * casework approach: find material‚ identify‚ analyse (DNA)‚ evaluate/compare (after able to create DNA profile)‚then lastly interpret * how does that work? 3 main groups of DNA
Free DNA DNA profiling National DNA database
regarding inductions and deductive reasoning as they apply to forensic sciences. Inductions are described by Thornton (1997b‚ p. 13) as an inference that is derived by specific observations to a generalization‚ or an assumption that may not always be valid. On the other hand‚ a deductive reasoning is defined as a forensics-evidence-based‚ process-oriented method of investigative reasoning based off of the behavioral patterns of a particular offender (Turvey‚ 1999). Historically‚ forensic scientists have failed
Premium Crime Police Criminal law