OPPOSITION BETWEEN DEDUCTIVE AND INDUCTIVE TECHNIQUES Students have different learning skills and capacities for getting to know about shown and told knowledge. To teach something effectively ‚ we have many techniques used while educating. So‚ during the teaching process teachers use different methods to school effectively. Two of them are deductive and inductive techniqe. Both of them have adventages but they are completely different from each other with the dominant people‚ flowing of information
Free Education Teacher
1. I see many differences from a deductive approach to the research: the fact itself that this research is qualitative‚ often lead to implement the “opposite” approach‚ the inductive one. Evidence of this are various and enough clear: - to go there on the field is not really a prerogative of the deductive approach: instead‚ what usually happens is that many quantitative data are gathered‚ with strongly structured and often impersonal methods. So‚ what happens in the case we’re dealing with is clearly
Free Scientific method
STRATEGIC THINKING CONSTRUCTS Dr Colin Benjamin OAM © 2012 INTRODUCTION The work shop is designed to provide clarity about the language of social inclusion and social policy formulation for practitioners seeking to efficiently‚ effectively and effulgently apply processes of strategic thinking to achieve environmental changes. This set of strategic thinking constructs provides a platform for the design and construction
Premium Inductive reasoning Deductive reasoning Reasoning
being true in an advertisement with ex-steel plant worker Joe Soptic‚ speaking in Obama-affiliated Political Action Committee Priorities. The advertisement included many logical fallacies to argue against the Romney campaign. Those include post hoc reasoning‚ ad hominem‚ and slippery slope. The advertisement consisted of just one man‚ Joe Soptic‚ an ex-steel plant worker‚ of GST Steel‚ speaking against Mitt Romney. He personally points blame on Romney for the death of his wife. He says that when “Mitt
Premium Fallacy Argument Critical thinking
sometimes narrowly defined as the faculty or process of drawing logical inferences. From Aristotle onwards‚ such reasoning has been classified as either deductive reasoning‚ meaning "from the general to the particular"‚ or inductive reasoning‚ meaning "from the particular to the general". In the 19th century‚ Charles Peirce‚ an American philosopher‚ added a third classification‚ abductive reasoning‚ by which he meant "from the best available information to the best explanation"‚ which has become an important
Premium Logic Reasoning Inductive reasoning
it certainly does reject the use of guessing and intuition in arriving at conclusions. 2. Good research is logical: This implies that research is guided by the rules of logical reasoning and the logical process of induction and deduction are of great value in carrying out research. Induction is the process of reasoning from a part
Premium Reasoning Scientific method Deductive reasoning
Philosophy notes 9-17-13 Two forms of argument 1) Deductive= provides logically conclusive spport for the conclusion Valid-if the premises are true then the conclusion cannot be false Invalid- it fail to provide support Sound-the argument is valid and the premises are all true Unsound- an argument with true premises that lead to a false conclusion 2) Inductive-provides probable support for the conclusion Strong-premises are true conclusion is probably true cogent-premises are true argument
Premium Logic Argument
Discussion questions two each week: Should be responded to during the week class is in session Starting TUESDAY. (DO NOT wait till Monday the last day of any academic week to answer all the questions) P.S... Read ALL of the posts with IMPORTANT in the subject line first and follow the directions. Please put your name after the DQ in the subject line. When you respond directly to the DQ‚ 100 word count minimum on ALL posts. Week 1; DQ1: How does psychology as a scientific discipline
Premium Reasoning Logic Inductive reasoning
* LOGIC Logic has two meanings: first‚ it describes the use of valid reasoning where it is used in most intellectual activities‚ including philosophy and science‚ or‚ second‚ it describes the study of modes of reasoning (those that are valid‚ and those that are fallacious). It is primarily studied in the disciplines of philosophy‚ mathematics‚ semantics‚ and computer science. It examines general forms that arguments may take. In mathematics‚ it is the study of valid inferences within some formal
Premium Logic Reasoning
David Hume’s "The Origin of Our Ideas and Skepticism about Causal Reasoning" states his beliefs about knowledge and his idea that we can only have relative certainty of truth. Skeptics concur that there is not enough evidence to predict the future or prove truth. In "An Argument Against Skepticism‚" John Hospers argues that we can have absolute certainty because there is enough evidence from the past and from our own experiences to prove an argument to be true. Although both Hume and Hospers make
Premium Logic Epistemology Inductive reasoning