TOPIC#: BLOOMS TAXONOMY NAME: SUMAN KUMAR SADULA EMAIL: sumansadula@gmail.com OCTOBER 1ST 2010 Table of contents Abstract...............................................................................................................................3 1. INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................3 2. BLOOMS TAXONOMY AND STRATEGIC PLANNING..............................................3 3.
Premium Educational psychology Reasoning Psychology
Descartes and Hobbes: Indubitable Truth In the early 17th century‚ a period known as the Scientific Revolution‚ French philosopher Rene Descartes developed an alternative approach to expanding knowledge and understanding of the world from the traditional Scholastic Aristotelianism. In 1640‚ English philosopher Thomas moved to France to escape the English Civil War. This around the time when Descartes wrote his famous works Discourse on the Method in 1637 and Meditations in 1641. Hobbes began writing
Premium René Descartes Perception Mind
References: Bluedorn‚ H.‚ 1995‚ Two Methods of Reasoning [online]‚ Availabe from: http://www.triviumpursuit.com/articles/two_methods_of_reasoning.php [Accessed 30th June 2013] Checkley‚ K.‚ 1997‚ Educational Leadership: Teaching for Multiple Intelligence‚ Volume 55‚ United States‚ ASCD Ferch‚ C.‚ 2013
Premium Problem solving Theory of multiple intelligences Logic
“Twelve Angry Men” – A Critical thinkers Argument analysis. The search for truth‚ does the end justify the means? Introduction. The play and subsequent movie “Twelve Angry Men” is an examination of the dynamics at play in a jury room in the 50’s in The United States. The action revolves around the opinions‚ perceptions‚ reason and logic of twelve diverse characters that are tasked with pronouncing the guilt or innocence of a young man accused of patricide. The extraordinary element is that their
Premium Critical thinking Reasoning Logic
pornography. The arguer reports back an irrelevant thesis that the Senator is in favour of complete governmental censorship of books‚ magazines and films. 6. Challenge the fallacy. (4 Marks) Explain what is wrong with using this pattern of reasoning with reference to any violations of the 3 criteria for a good argument . State which criteria for a good argument the fallacy violates. Explain what it means to violate that criteria for a good argument (relevancy‚ sufficiency‚ acceptability)
Free Critical thinking Logic Fallacy
TOK- Essay Question 9 “Discuss the roles of language and reasoning in history” 1451 words Nadia Lotze 000 865-015 Mr Skeoch History is the past written by the present. The very nature of this statement creates the predicament of historical knowledge. The historians of the present are under constant pressure of rapidly changing society; therefore what we discover from the past is dependent on our perceptions that are forever changing. History and historical explanations are deduced and manipulated
Premium Logic Reasoning Reason
Vieira‚ 2000‚ p. 29). Critical thinking is clear and rational‚ involves precise and systematic skills and follows the rules of logical and scientific reasoning (Lau‚ 2011‚ p. 1). It is a set of skills and attitudes that result in the evaluation of the reasoning of a speaker or writer‚ using specific generally accepted criteria for strong reasoning. For example‚ that a conclusion should have a reason in the first place is a standard that requires explicit attention. Multiple strategies could advance
Premium Critical thinking Reasoning Logic
One of the three argumentation concepts that were mentioned while watching the lesson video was a syllogism‚ which is a line of deductive reasoning that engages the reader’s intellectual and reasoning capacity. Three parts are used to create a syllogism. If Premise A is true and Premise B is true‚ then conclusion C must be true! Premise A is a statement based on direct observation and Premise B is based on scientific fact. Premise C is what can be inferred from both. To support my argument‚ I have
Premium Logic Critical thinking Thought
MORAL REASONING Short Essay: Moral reasoning is individual or collective practical reasoning about what‚ morally‚ one ought to do. For present purpose‚ we may understand issues about what is right or wrong‚ virtuous or vicious‚ as raising moral question. When we are faced with moral questions in daily life‚ just as when we are faced with child-rearing questions‚ sometimes we act impulsively or instinctively and sometimes we pause to reason about what we ought to do. Much of our reasoning comes
Free Morality George W. Bush Ethics
the process of intuition is an important way to attain knowledge. However Myers criticizes intuition as a perilous means of knowing. This paper will demonstrate that‚ perhaps instinct is not a foolproof means of attaining knowledge‚ nevertheless reasoning and logic can fail us as well. It is the human mind rather then the process that causes the error in both causes. Intuition‚ then‚ is by no means inferior to the other processes of attaining knowledge. According to Daniel Cappon‚ intuition is
Premium Logic Reasoning