contract who is of age of majority according to law to which he is subject‚ and who is of sound mind‚ and is not disqualified from contracting by any law to which he is subject.” It means that the following three categories of persons are not competent to contract. 1. A person who has not attained the age of majority‚ i.e.‚ one who is minor. 2. A person who is of unsound mind 3. A person who has been disqualified from contracting by some law. Although the above mentioned categories of
Premium Contract
University of Phoenix | Article/Case Law Search Paper | Tuberculosis-Critical Regulatory Issue | | | July 19‚ 2010 Article/Case Law Search Paper A critical regulatory issue in health care is a really broad subject and will always be discussed and debated on. According to The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention‚ “TB is an airborne‚ communicable disease caused by infection with the bacterium Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infection occurs typically when a person inhales microscopic
Premium Tuberculosis Public health
2nd of feb CASES MALLIK V BCC: Malik and Mahmud v Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA [1997] UKHL 23 is a leading English contract law and UK labour law case‚ which confirmed the existence of the implied term of mutual trust and confidence in all contracts of employment. Facts: Mr Malik and Mr Mahmud both worked for the Bank of Credit and Commerce International. BCCI went insolvent due to massive fraud‚ connection with terrorists‚ money-laundering‚ extortion and a raft of other criminal
Premium Contract Breach of contract
Article/Case Law Search Ngozi Ofolomah HCS/430 February 4‚ 2013 Vanessa Williams Article/Case Law Search The aftermath of the 9/11 in 2001‚ has left the United States of America in frenzy. It is this particular event that has been devastating to our nation and unforgettable. Furthermore‚ stressing the importance of the safety and health of the general public. September 11‚ has caused federal and state governments to merge public health and public safety into one. This merger brought about
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution
EMTALA The article I chose to discuss was a court case involving the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA). A Dickinson County hospital violated EMTALA for failing to provide emergency care for a patient who was transferred to a different hospital without being completely stable enough for transfer. In 1985‚ Congress passed the law of “Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act” also known as (EMTALA) to ensure public access and treatment to emergency services regardless of race
Premium Emergency medical services Medicine Hospital
confirmatory chemical analysis before the case can be adjudicated in court; (4) the advent of DNA profiling. 2. Describe the criteria for admissibility of scientific evidence as laid out in Frye v. United States. The court ruled that in order to be admitted as evidence at trail‚ the questioned procedure technique‚ or principles must be “generally accepted” by a meaningful segment of relevant scientific community. This approach requires the proponent of scientific test to present to the court a collection
Premium Evidence law United States Scientific method
Part a) Legal position enabling expulsion of Annabel from the partnership. Step 1:- The problem at hand deals with Partnership law as governed by the Partnership Act 1895 in the absence of a written agreement. Principles of Common law and Equitable principles also apply. Partnership Act governs the partnership of ‘Health Plus’. Sec. 30 of the Act‚ as it relates to misappropriation of partnership property. The application of Sec. 39 Partnership Act 1895 and the Fiduciary Duty breached. Supreme
Premium Partnership Contract
1 LS 220 Constitutional Law ASSIGNMENT ONE ‘ADVISE THE MP ON THE LEGALITY‚ IN PARTICULAR‚ THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE MIGRATION BILL 2014.’ UNIT CO-ORDINATOR: DR OTTAVIO QUIRICO WORD COUNT: 1925 I INTRODUCTION The proposed Migration Bill (hereafter referred to as the Bill) raises a number of issues that must be analysed in order to ascertain the constitutionality of the proposals within the Act. The main considerations arise from sections 180‚ and 181 which state ‘that an officer must detain
Premium Law United Kingdom Human rights
Principles of Scientific Management and its Applications in Modern Day Organizations Introduction Managers have been continuously trying to figure out the best way to manage the workplace since the start of the industrial revolution. The goal is to maximize production output and minimize cost therefore getting maximized profit while still keeping workers happy and motivated. Different methods have been introduced and tested. But perhaps one of the most influential and popular ideas in management is ‘scientific
Premium Scientific management Management Frederick Winslow Taylor
Canny Gabrial Castle v Volume Sales(p200): Canny Gabrial argued that the 2 companies were joint ventures Decision: Agreement was partnership Polkinghorne v Holland(p205): Was the giving of financial advice outside the ordinary business of the law firm‚ such that the partners would be jointly liable Decision: Held that the firm was liable for the actions of hollan’s son Lec 5 Chap 13 Balfour v Balfour(256): At the time of the agreement‚ did the parties intend the arrangement to be anything
Premium Contract