I’ve recently read Mr. Clarkson’s article‚ “Stuff the tiger-long live extinction” and have been awestruck that his believes on tiger extinction is equitable. After deliberating‚ I have reached the conclusion that I definitely disagree with his outrageous thoughts on tigers. In the article‚ Mr. Clarkson’s racist and assertive tone infuriates me. He indicated that “up to 600 million Chinese people believe that tigers can cure many ailments.” I am conscious that there are such medicines sold in various
Premium Tiger
Civil law is divided into different categories such as Family law‚ Tort‚ contract law and administrative law (Nockleby‚ 2013). Family law is regarded as the law that regulates rights‚ duties and relationship within the family (Statsky‚ 2014) while tort is the general label given to a class of civil wrong whereby the courts provides a remedy as compensation for damages (Weller‚ 2013). Furthermore‚ Miller and Jentz‚ (2013) identified contract law is an enforceable agreement while Adamson (2011) defines
Premium Nursing Patient Health care
Spanking has become a debatable topic for decades. Some people are in support of it‚ while others are against it. According to the Farlex dictionary “spanking is defined as a number of slaps on the buttocks delivered in a rapid succession as for punishment.” In reality Spanking should not be considered as a child abuse. It should only be considered an abuse based on how it is issued. Parents are not supposed to beat their child on the head or in the face. If that happens‚ it will cause injury to
Premium Spanking Physical abuse Psychological manipulation
Informed consent is a legal document which serves as an agreement for treatment‚ non-treatment‚ or for an invasive procedure that requires physicians to disclose the benefits‚ risks‚ and alternatives to the treatment‚ non-treatment‚ or procedure (1). In order for informed consent to be considered valid‚ the client must be competent and the consent should be given voluntarily. For individuals who are legally incapable of giving informed consent‚ psychologists need make sure to provide an appropriate
Free Insanity defense Mental disorder Psychiatry
The Understanding of Double Jeopardy Channelle M. Hopson Grambling State University Author Note Channelle M. Hopson‚ Department of Criminal Justice‚ Grambling State University. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Channelle M. Hopson‚ Department of Criminal Justice‚ Grambling State University‚ Grambling‚ La. 71245. Contact: monique2us2000@gmail.com Abstract This paper is to enlighten the audience of the double jeopardy rule. Double jeopardy refers to a person being
Premium Jury Double jeopardy Murder
The jury system has deep historical roots and has been described by Lord Devlin in title ‘Trial by Jury’ as ‘the lamp that shows the freedom lives’. Juries allow the citizens to take part in the administration of justice so that verdicts are seen to be those of society rather the judicial system. Furthermore‚ in Justice‚ Democracy and the Jury‚ named Gobart James stated that freeing the jury from the law and precedent allows them to follow their conscience and good sense‚ and juries instinctively
Premium Jury Law
People of the State of California v. Orenthal James Simpson‚ the trial lasted from November 2‚ 1994 to October 3‚ 1995. After the extensive trial‚ Simpson was acquitted on murder due to a lack of evidence to convict him. This verdict is one of the most highly debated verdicts in one of the most high profile case. The origin of this high profile case dates back to June 12‚ 1994. The facts of this night are disputed but what is known is that an intruder entered through the gate of Nicole Simpson’s
Premium O. J. Simpson murder case Nicole Brown Simpson O. J. Simpson
money. “There’s more money out there in those streets‚ and I want to know how I can make more of it”. In his money-hungry words one can truly view his desperation to accumulate more money despite having to go to the extreme to retrieve this. After deliberating a few ideas on how to accumulate more money‚ both Joseph Pulitzer and William Randolph Hearst decide to team upand profit together instead of constantly competing to gain profits. They would then proceed to raising the price of newspapers‚ believing
Premium William Randolph Hearst
If measures to guard against the dangers of the Icarus Paradox (Miller‚ 1992) are relatively straightforward‚ then why do so many organisations fall prey to it? The Icarus paradox is a neologism coined by Danny Miller. The term refers to the phenomenon of businesses failing abruptly after a period of apparent success (Miller‚ 1990) (The Icarus Paradox)‚ where this failure is brought about by the very elements that led to their initial success. It alludes to Icarus of Greek mythology‚ who drowned
Premium Organization Success Failure
in some on the very top levels prior to the merging through negotiation of bringing their most trusted executives on board. Lundgren wants a subjective process based from human skills while Ashton wants an objective process – evaluating and deliberating test results. Lundgren agreed that Ashton’s decision will hinder the merger from biased and emotional decision‚ but it will take up so much time that the best managers will get another job and
Premium Management