ABSTRACT Mapp v. Ohio is a landmark case in criminal procedure of the USA‚ in which the US Supreme Court decided that evidence obtained by illegal search ad seizure which was against the Fourth Amendment‚ will not be used in state courts‚ as well as in federal courts. The Court in Mapp also based its decision on the necessity to protect citizens from police misconduct. This case overrules the decision in the case of Wolf v. Colorado. The Supreme Court decision in Mapp v. Ohio was quite controversial
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
selling out on release. SUMMER 2013 DUBAI PRIME RESIDENTIAL REVIEW Prime sales market update Helen Tatham Director of Residential Knight Frank Dubai The Dubai real estate market showed the first firm signs of recovery in early 2012 but this was not across all sectors. “Freehold ownership of Dubai real estate for non-Gulf Cooperation Council Nationals has now been in existence for over a decade. Since its inception in 2002‚ we saw a rapid rise in demand and pricing up to the peak
Premium United Arab Emirates Dubai
The Liebeck v. McDonald’s case was a product liability lawsuit filed by Stella Liebeck‚ a 79 year old woman who was burned by a scalding hot coffee. One Sunday afternoon in 1994‚ Stella Liebeck ordered a cup of coffee at a McDonald’s drive through in Albuquerque‚ New Mexico. As she sat alongside her grandson in a 1989 Ford Probe‚ Liebeck noticed that there were no cup holders on the passenger side. Acting quickly‚ Liebeck decided to put the coffee cup between her knees. When she removed the coffee
Premium Nutrition Obesity Blood
Illusory Promise | You be the Judge Case Study An illusory promise sounds like a promise or commitment‚ but is not really a promise or commitment to do anything. Because it does not bind the maker to do anything‚ it may not be treated as consideration to establish a contract. Culbertson v. Brodsky Culbertson had listed real estate for sale. Brodsky & Culbertson signed an option contract. Option document: - Brodsky delivers $5‚000 check to bank; - Bank holds
Premium Contract Contract law Law
QNT351~WK5 Individual Assignment: Real Estate Data DUE SUNDAY‚ MAY 21st Resources: Appendix A1 at the end of Basic Statistics for Business and Economics (See attached Chapters 10 & 13 to answer questions below) QUESTION #1: Answer question 58 in the Data Set Exercises from Ch. 10 of Basic Statistics for Business and Economics. Exercise #58: Refer to the Real Estate data‚ which report information on homes sold in Phoenix‚ Arizona‚ last year. a. A recent article in The Arizona
Premium Real estate Real property Property
Why Property Outshines the Rest Property’s phenomenal leveraging power When I tell people that property is not just as good as other investments‚ not just a little better‚ and not even just a lot better‚ but tens or even hundreds of times better than other investments‚ most people do not believe it.” Realty Reality Check So let me show you why property is so much better. Imagine you have a lump sum of money to invest. The amount doesn’t matter‚ as the same principles apply whether you have
Premium Real estate
Gulf Real Estate Properties Tam Vo MATH410 Aug 14‚ 2011 Introduction Gulf Real Estate Properties‚ Inc.‚ a company that specialized in condominium sales in southwest Florida‚ provided a sample date set on two types of condominium: 40 of Gulf View; those located directly on the Gulf of Mexico‚ and 18 of No Gulf View; those located near but not on the Gulf. In order to provide in depth statistically analysis‚ this paper will summarize descriptive statistics from the company ’s sample data‚ and
Premium Standard deviation Arithmetic mean
RENO v. AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION US Supreme Court‚ 1997 1. Claim: Attorney General Janet Reno‚ the appellant appealed directly to the Supreme Court as provided for by the Act’s special review provisions against the appellee‚ ACLU. 2. Facts: The 1996 Federal Communications Decency Act sought to protect minors from “indecent” and offensive Internet materials. The Act made it a crime to transmit obscene or indecent messages over the Internet. Immediately after the CDA became law‚ twenty
Premium Supreme Court of the United States First Amendment to the United States Constitution United States
Finally‚ on July 27‚ 2000‚ Marie Villette (plaintiff) had a carport installed from Sheldorado Aluminum Product (defendant). The covering would collapse six months later on top of the plaintiffs Mercedes Benz. All the plaintiff is requesting is the $3‚000 she has spent on the carport. Ms. Villette filed a lawsuit opposing Sheldorado expecting the return of her $3000. Ms. Villette and Sheldorado‚ had no formal written contract‚ however‚ there was a bill of sale; it is dated 11 July‚ 2000. Ms. Villette
Premium Contract Law Contract law
Dr. Emerson in free territories become the basis for his case. The process began in 1846: Scott lost in his initial suit in a local St. Louis district court‚ but he won in a second trial‚ only to have that decision overturned by the Missouri State Supreme Court. With support from local abolitionists‚ Scott filed another suit in federal court in 1854‚ against John Sanford‚ the widow Emerson’s brother and executor of his estate. When that case was decided in favor of Sanford‚ that Scott turned to the
Premium American Civil War Slavery in the United States Abraham Lincoln