Clusters and the new economics of competition Harvard Business Review; Boston; Nov/Dec 1998; Michael E. Porter; Volume: 76 Issue: 6 Start Page: 77-90 ISSN: 00178012 Abstract: Today’s economic map of the world is dominated by what are called clusters: critical masses - in one place - of unusual competitive success in particular fields. Clusters are not unique‚ however; they are highly typical - and therein lies a paradox: the enduring competitive advantages in a global economy
Premium Productivity Economic geography Economics
Refereed Paper Regional Economic Development: Exploring the ‘Role of Government’ in Porter’s Industrial Cluster Theory. Dr Mark Wickham School of Management University of Tasmania Mark Wickham Locked Bag 16 School of Management University of Tasmania Hobart Campus Sandybay 7005. Ph: 03 6226 2159 Fax: 03 6226 2808 Mark.Wickham@utas.edu.au Dr Mark Wickham works as a lecturer at the University of Tasmania‚ specialising in the disciplines of Business Strategy and Marketing. Mark’s
Premium Government Policy Federal government of the United States
Non-Hierarchical Cluster Analysis Non-hierarchical cluster analysis (often known as K-means Clustering Method) forms a grouping of a set of units‚ into a pre-determined number of groups‚ using an iterative algorithm that optimizes a chosen criterion. Starting from an initial classification‚ units are transferred from one group to another or swapped with units from other groups‚ until no further improvement can be made to the criterion value. There is no guarantee that the solution thus obtained
Premium Cluster analysis
following disorders are disorders first seen in childhood: Attention deficit Hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) Autism and Asperger’s Disorder Mental Retardation CHILDHOOD DISORDER: ADHd (attention deficit hyperactivity disoder) ADHD: symptoms and criteria ADHD is a developmental disorder and usually starts during infancy Central features: inattention‚ hyperactivity‚ and impulsivity Tend to be forgetful. Frequently misplace items Tend to make careless errors Associated with/leads to behavioral
Premium Schizophrenia Personality disorder Borderline personality disorder
Remeny White Jimmy Lue Camilha Contreras Team 7 Period 6 The Informed Argument Cluster Questions pages 282-301: Extreme Surgery 1. This claim does not seem reasonable to me; rather‚ it seems outright ridiculous. As a cross country runner‚ my body wept when he said that “exercise and diet‚ it seems‚ are too much like hard work”. To believe that plastic surgery is the only way to get in shape or feel good about yourself is false and frankly depressing. 2. Although it is sad‚ I do
Premium Plastic surgery Surgery Reconstructive surgery
Water Quality Water Quality Criteria are levels of individual pollutants or water quality characteristics‚ or descriptions of conditions of a body of water that‚ if met‚ will generally protect the designated use of the water. For a given DU‚ there are likely to be a number of criteria dealing with different types of conditions‚ as well as levels of specific chemicals... Water quality criteria must be fit the use of water. Only scientific considerations are taken into consideration when determining
Premium Water
Establishing evaluation criteria is needed to evaluate alternatives and to make decisions. Depending on the nature of the problem different constraints may be used to design a policy. Once evaluating a clear criterion‚ we must go through a process of identifying alternatives that will later be evaluated in the terms of criteria. Evaluation criteria are grouped in four categories‚ identified by Bardach. For each policy problem‚ we should be able to identify relevant criteria in each category. They
Premium Cost-benefit analysis Costs Cost
the same four criteria‚ another study identified adolescents who fulfilled diagnostic criteria for caffeine dependence. These studies‚ which represent a series of case reports‚ demonstrate that a clinically meaningful caffeine dependence syndrome does exist. When individuals in the general population are surveyed about their caffeine use‚ a surprisingly large proportion endorse substance dependence criteria. In a random digit-dial telephone survey in which all seven DSM-IV criteria for substance
Premium Drug addiction Addiction Heroin
EVALUATION OF THE SOFTWARE “LENDING SYSTEM OF AN EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION: BASIS FOR SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT.” Evaluation Criteria 4 = Outstanding (O) 3 = Good (G) 2 = Satisfactory (S) 1 = Poor (P) User Interaction These criteria cover the user’s interaction with the program‚ the objectives and features of the program‚ and your analysis of it. 4 (O) 3 (G) 2 (S) 1 (P) 1. The purpose of the program is well defined and clearly explained to the user 2. The organization
Premium Computer software Computer Clear
Formalising ERP Selection Criteria Xavier Burgués Illa Univ. Politècnica Catalunya Edifici C6 Campus Nord Jordi Girona Salgado 1- 3 08034 Barcelona. Spain +34 934 017 006 diafebus@lsi.upc.es Abstract We present a proposal for selecting ERP products from a formal description of their relevant characteristics. The work is based on a previous and successful collaboration with a midsize company in the field of software package selection. An ERP was selected following a systematic methodology called
Premium Requirements analysis Enterprise resource planning Software quality