National Collegiate Athletic Association Ethics and Compliance Program Kimberly D. Nash JAMES ZIEGLER Strayer University May 17‚ 2015 Penn State‚ Ohio State and the University of Arkansas scandals Ethics in any profession are vital. In the modern day‚ professionalism is under serious threat from unethical behaviors. These unethical behaviors are driven by the greed for power and personal whims by people in power. In any case‚ unethical behaviors have been rampant especially where power is involved
Premium College National Collegiate Athletic Association University
negatively affected. ABC company could potentially lose the development‚ and Lewis could would lose his reputation with the company or maybe even his job. Another way Lewis could approach his dilemma would be the use the universal ethics theory. The universal ethics theory focuses on moral absolutism and the concepts of good and bad. The theory operates outside of cultural and religious norms and focuses on what is universally conceived as right and wrong. In this situation Lewis would have to decide
Premium Ethics
compacted in an Act that is entitled under the Code of Ethics for Nurses. Code of ethics simply means a set of rules or principles that govern a certain group of individuals within an organization or a Union of professionals. New employees in professions‚ organization and companies are usually given a set of principles of which they are required to sign and adhere. (Fowler & American Nurses Association 2008). In most cases‚ a violation of these ethics may lead to serious consequences such as jail terms
Premium Nursing Patient Health care
The ethical issues in this case involve APA General Principle A: Beneficence and Nonmaleficence‚ B: Fidelity and Responsibility‚ and E: Respect for People’s Rights and Dignity. Also involved are APA ethical standards codes‚ 3.9 Cooperation With Other Professionals‚ 4.1 Maintaining Confidentiality‚ and 10.4 Providing Therapy to Those Served by Others. Dr. Cummings should in response adhere to APA General Principle A: Beneficence and Nonmaleficence as well as General Principle B: Fidelity and Responsibility
Premium Ethics Morality Business ethics
Friendly Advice and Quid Pro Quo? Prior responding to the case study questions‚ I would like to mention two points that relates with employee’s unethical behaviour in an organization. The first is one is‚ the role of leaders in influencing unethical behaviour in the workplace. In most cases‚ employee did unethical act for the following reasons: due to lack of motivation‚ while falling in to ethical dilemma‚ and when they are under frustration…etc. When we discuss about unethical act‚ always it is
Premium Management Employment Leadership
Bradley Miller 2/12/15 Seminar of Finance Case Study Ethics in Finance 1. Have I defined the problem correctly and accurately? Answer: The problem was that the WorldCom Company was falling farther and farther into debt and they needed a way out of this hard time. The CEO came to us with a plan to turn the company or in reality to make it look as if the company was headed into the right direction‚ when in fact it was not. The plan was to use other accounts that have holding money in them for other
Premium Investment Finance Ethics
me get a higher positioned job in the future. For myself‚ if I know telling Stewart is unethical and I still do it‚ I am going against my own moral values. By doing so‚ I am complying with Albert Carr’s way of thinking about business and personal ethics being separate. I would be complying with Carr’s thinking because I would be following Baconivic’s orders even though it goes against my own values. If I don’t listen to Baconivic‚ I could risk losing my job at the company. By doing so‚ it could put
Premium Ethics Business ethics Morality
3.10 Research ethics As the proponents conduct the study‚ the survey and interview methods were made in a right and brief way to gathered data that will be used in the design and development of the proposed system. Ethical principles were observed with the hope that this would promote trust between the researches and the respondents. 3.11 Evaluation Procedure This table shows the range and their verbal interpretation of the computed weighted mean of the study. Table 1: Five Point Scale RATING RANGE
Premium Weighted mean Formula Arithmetic mean
Case Study #2 The “White Coffin” Dilemma GSM 5131 BUSINESS LAW & ETHICS 1 Story Outline • Aminah‚ quality senior manager of Good Food Packaging S/B (“the Company”) which manufacture polystyrene‚ plastic & foam food container in SK. • Recently‚ she been told & found that her company‟s product will cause adverse effect to human health. • She now very much concern with this issue‚ and management of the Company also been notified. They want Aminah to just „close one eye‟ and not reveal to
Premium Ethics Corporation Morality
ACCT 201 Ethics Case* Fall 2012 NAME: Janika Washington________________ MAJOR: Business Management____________ Please complete items 1 through 4 by typing in your answers in the space provided and then printing TWO (2) copies of the completed case and submitting both copies in class on the date specified by your instructor. As the controller of LNP Company‚ Amy discovers a misstatement that overstated net income in the prior year’s financial statements. The misleading financial statements
Premium Ethics Morality Chief executive officer