Descartes: Proofs of God/Deception and Error Instructions: First: Analyze and evaluate the two proofs of God’s existence. How are they different? Is one more convincing than the other? Why did Descartes think he needed two proofs? Do they do different work for him? And secondly: Does Descartes give a satisfactory account of human error‚ given a perfect and divine creator? Are Descartes’ arguments convincing‚ or does it still seem unnecessary and less than perfect that God created us with
Premium Omnipotence God Theology
Compare Anselm and Descartes The proof of the existence of God was a topic of discussion during the early centuries until the first philosophers of the world decided to root for the truth and show the existence of God. In proving the existence of God in certain ways the arguments oppose each other‚ support each other and also some arguments seem to be more convincing than the other. The empirical arguments and the rationalistic arguments are the two types of arguments used in proving God’s existence
Premium Metaphysics Existence Ontology
Among Descartes’ many notable arguments‚ in the Sixth Meditation he makes a case for the real distinction between mind and body. This idea that mind and body are distinct was not common during Descartes’ time and conflicted directly with the popularly accepted scholastic view of the human being as a hylomorphic substance. The argument of the Sixth Meditation draws on much of Descartes’ own work concerning substance‚ attributes and distinction. In this paper‚ I will argue that he arrives at the conclusion
Premium Ontology Thought Mind
written by Rene Descartes. Many philosophers look to this book for inspiration and for answers to many of life’s questions. One of these philosophers would be David Hume. Hume often did not share the same thoughts and beliefs as Descartes but uses his ideas on the origin of thought to further explain his own. The Meditations are written in order to answer one simple question‚ “what can we know for certain?” While this might seem like a very simple question to answer‚ Descartes takes a different
Premium Epistemology Metaphysics Plato
Rene Descartes’ concepts of innate knowledge‚ mind/body dualism‚ and theories of consciousness as a byproduct of the mind. These ideas transformed the face of philosophy and solidified Descartes as the venerable “Father of Philosophy” until John Locke’s progressive concepts
Premium Mind Consciousness Philosophy of mind
Descartes’ Discourse on the Method – Part IV Gustavo Barraza Strayer University Humanities - World Cultures II Dr. Elaine Cassel Winter 2013 Descartes’ Discourse on the Method – Part IV Descartes describes the results of his meditations when he reached the true knowledge and findings of the truth of his though. At the beginning of his investigation‚ Descartes undertakes to consider as false everything that he can possibly doubt. Descartes suggest that our sense experience‚ imagination
Premium Mind Epistemology Reason
Rene Descartes and Paul Churchland are both well respected philosophers with different out-looks on the mind and body relationship. Descartes achieved many great things in his time‚ but at the time that he wrote Meditations on First Philosophy he seemed to be borderline insane. His ideas are too drastic and gloomy‚ where as Churchland’s ideas in his writing Eliminitative Materialism seems to be agreeable and bright. Rene Descartes was a famous French Philosopher‚ mathematician‚ and scientist. Because
Premium René Descartes Philosophy of mind Mind
Understanding Descartes’ Method of Doubt Clear your mind‚ if you will‚ of everything you have ever seen or known to be true. To begin understanding Rene Descartes’ method of doubt‚ you need to suspend all prejudice and prior judgments and start with a clean slate "for the purpose of discovering some ultimate truth on which to base all thought." (Kolak‚ Pg.225). Discouraged with much skepticism from his own beliefs‚ Descartes was embarrassed of his own ignorance. He set out to try and accomplish
Premium
no way aims to prove that God exists. Unlike Descartes‚ who tries to prove God’s existence through the idea of God himself Pascal does not think such a proof can succeed. Pascal does a good job in his argument because he takes both sides into account and comes to a reasonable conclusion using mathematics. Overall‚ Pascal’s wager is preferable to Descartes’ meditations because they contain many errors and do not appeal to people outside of Descartes’ own mind or beliefs. Pascal focuses on the question:
Free God Existence
Throughout the Meditations‚ Descartes successfully establishes methodical doubt about math and all sensory information‚ however‚ his answer to the doubt cast by the Evil Demon ploy does not fully relieve the dilemma of skepticism that his intense application of doubt has brought forth. Ultimately‚ Descartes is unable to satisfactorily answer the Evil Demon doubt because his argument does not prove that God’s existence would not prevent the serious errors in judgment and perception caused by the
Premium Epistemology Existence Metaphysics