In Meditations on First Philosophy‚ René Descartes outlines his proof for the existence of God. However‚ philosopher David Hume offers a rebuttal in An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding that questions not only Descartes’ proof for God but also his notion concerning how humans acquire knowledge. In what follows‚ I will examine Descartes’ proof for God’s existence and then argue that Hume would disagree with it. Furthermore‚ Hume responds to Descartes’ claims that God is the source of our knowledge
Premium Metaphysics Ontology Epistemology
Descartes argues in “Meditation VI” that he can exist without his body. What is his argument for this? Can you similarly imagine existing without a body? If so how? If not why not? Discuss. The concern of the following paper is on the most significant premises found in Cartesian dualism‚ namely the mind-body dualism. Proposed initialy by French philosopher-mathematician Rene Descartes‚ the claim for an independent relationship between the existence of intelligable and corporeal things
Premium Mind Metaphysics René Descartes
Epistemology is the study of how we acquire knowledge and justify our beliefs. Descartes promoted a rationalist epistemology through his masterwork Meditations on First Philosophy (1641)‚ which were designed to build a theory of knowledge from the ground up. Rationalism states that knowledge is acquired through the use of reason. In contrast‚ John Locke promoted empiricist epistemology through his Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Empiricism is any view which bases our knowledge‚ or the materials
Premium Epistemology Scientific method Philosophy
Descartes’ reasons for believing in substance dualism relies on several arguments including his argument for certainty or knowledge. The argument relies on the idea that I can be certain of my mind but not my body or any other physical thing‚ so my mind is not a physical thing. In this paper‚ I will argue that Descartes’ assessment of the mind-body connection makes a jump in its logic by declaring that the mind cannot be physical‚ even though his certainty argument does not take into account that
Premium Mind René Descartes Metaphysics
very important in Descartes ’ philosophy. Reality and deception are big parts of Descartes philosophy‚ and to verify what reality is‚ God needs to be considered. God needs to be taken out of a religious context and be proven to exist in a way that we cannot be deceived into only thinking he ’s real. Religion had to be discarded completely during this proof so that Descartes can undoubtedly state that God does exist and that religious teaching had no influence in the proof. Descartes uses this proof
Premium Existence Ontology Theology
John Locke‚ also a philosopher and political theorist of the 17th century‚ would contend to the idea or theory of Rene Descartes. Locke would say that human knowledge is not natural or inborn; it is rather developed and learned. He indicates that not all human people have this mental knowledge already in their minds. For instance‚ people who are mentally ill do not have these “innate ideas” in their minds. Since there are abnormalities in their brain circuits they cannot think properly like a normal
Premium Psychology Mind Brain
Proving the Devine‚ Descartes Second Meditation For years scholars and philosophers have debated if god exists. One of the most prominent minds to attempt to tackle this problem was Rene Descartes. In Meditation III from his book Meditation on First Philosophy Descartes presents an argument for the existence of god. Descartes essentially argues that the idea of god has more reality then he dose and that therefore it couldn’t have originated from him or any other being with the same amount of reality
Premium Metaphysics Ontology Existence
Name Professor’s Name Class Date Descartes’ two proofs of God’s existence. Descartes uses the proof ‘Meditation III’ to explain God’s existence. The proof is given via reasoning‚ which begins by describing how he comes to such a conclusion. Descartes does this by mentally closing himself from the general public‚ ignoring hearing‚ sight‚ and the remaining of his senses as he deeply looks and depends upon himself. This state gives him the opportunity of making an introspective look at the existence
Premium Existence Theology Logic
to the question‚ what makes certain obtained pieces of knowledge true? Descartes would doubt everything until he came to an absolute and undeniable truth. If he had any reason to doubt something‚ it could not be true knowledge. Descartes then discovered one thing that he could not doubt and that is “I think‚ therefore I am.” He says that if he can think‚ then he knows that he exists. I agree and disagree with Rene Descartes theory of how we have knowledge. Just because you have doubt about something
Free Knowledge Epistemology Mind
Compare Anselm and Descartes The proof of the existence of God was a topic of discussion during the early centuries until the first philosophers of the world decided to root for the truth and show the existence of God. In proving the existence of God in certain ways the arguments oppose each other‚ support each other and also some arguments seem to be more convincing than the other. The empirical arguments and the rationalistic arguments are the two types of arguments used in proving God’s existence
Premium Metaphysics Existence Ontology