"Descartes vs hume causation" Essays and Research Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
Page 4 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes Vs Dillard

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Is your mind the ultimate guide to happiness and truth‚ or is experiencing things for yourself the only way to find the true meaning of life? Or is living in a cave confined of your own ignorance your ideal way to live a happy life? In Descartes

    Premium Mind Reality Truth

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes vs Locke

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages

    largely by experience‚ observation‚ and sensory perception. René Descartes and John Locke‚ both seventeenth century philosophers‚ are often seen as two of the first early modern philosophers. Both Descartes and Locke attempt to find answers to the same questions in metaphysics and epistemology; among these: What is knowledge? Is there certainty in knowledge? What roles do the mind and body play in the acquisition of knowledge? Descartes and Locke do not provide the same answers to these questions. In

    Premium Mind Perception Epistemology

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes vs Nietzsche

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages

    will argue that the clearest difference between Descartes and Nietzsche here is that whereas Descartes thought that ideas are passive‚ Nietzsche thought the opposite. Well‚ Descartes tries to prove the existence of God‚ which is the condition of establishing/ensuring an external world‚ including inter-subjectivity‚ in his view. God is a precondition of the innate ideas and connection with the surrounding world. There’s no doubt in the mind of Descartes that God exist. Hence‚ he is claiming that faith/religion

    Free Mind Thought Epistemology

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume Skepticism

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Hume asked‚ "what reason do we have in thinking the future will resemble the past?" It is reasonable to think that it will because there is no contradiction in supposing the future won’t resemble the past. But it is also true that is possible for the world to change dramatically and our previous experience would be completely useless in judging future experience. We want to say that past experiences have been a good predictor. We are compelled to do so and it is almost as if we can’t help ourselves

    Premium Free will Causality Metaphysics

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes Vs Montesquieu

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Like Descartes‚ Montesquieu associated freedom as being in accordance with reason. Unlike Descartes‚ Montesquieu did discuss external freedom as embodied through law more at length‚ and also wrote extensively on the subject of slavery. In The Spirit of Laws‚ Montesquieu writes that “… political liberty does not consist in an unlimited freedom. In governments‚ that is‚ in societies directed by laws‚ liberty can consist only in the power of doing what we ought to will‚ and in not being constrained

    Premium Slavery Slavery in the United States Human rights

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Spinoza vs Descartes on God

    • 3697 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Abstract and Referential Ontology: Descartes Versus Spinoza on the Existence of God. The concept of God is central to the development of Cartesian and Spinozan philosophy. Although both philosophers employ an ontological argument for the existence and necessity of God the specific nature of God differs greatly with each account. While Descartes suggests a Judeo-Christian concept of God‚ Spinoza argues a more monistic deity similar to that of the Hindu tradition. The most significant difference

    Premium Existence Ontology God

    • 3697 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume on Induction

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hume’s Problem Of Induction In A Treatise of Human Nature‚ Hume challenges the traditional theories of causality‚ the idea that one can make an observation about two events and infer a new claim concerning the conjunction of the first event and the “resulting” second event. Instead of accepting this notion of causality‚ Hume questions the certainty of matters of fact and more specifically induction. Hume states there are two distinct types of knowledge: relations of ideas and matters of fact

    Free Logic Inductive reasoning David Hume

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Argumentative Essay: Paley vs. Hume and the existence of a higher being Criticism of religious theories and practices is clearly valid and necessary. After all‚ what caused Jesus’s crucifixion was likely his disapproval of the resistance against his practices and beliefs. Accordingly‚ religious criticism is certainly more effective if it is respectful rather than dismissiveness‚ as it has the potential to elicit meaningful dialogue. While some claim that we come from cells that evolved into organisms

    Premium God Religion Metaphysics

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    From the origin of Western philosophical thought‚ there has always been an interest in moral laws . As Hume points out in A Treatise of Human Nature‚ ¡§morality is a subject that interests us above all others.¡¨ Originally‚ thoughts of how to live were centered on the issue of having the most satisfying life with ¡§virtue governing one¡¦s relations to others¡¨‚ as written by J. B. Schneewind in Modern Moral Philosophy. Nevertheless‚ the view that there is one way to live that is best for everyone

    Free Immanuel Kant Philosophy Morality

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    David Hume

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages

    David Hume was born in Scotland in 1711. He is known as a philosopher‚ historian‚ economist‚ and essayist‚ especially for advocating empiricism and skepticism. He had strongly influenced in the history of Western philosophy and the Scottish Enlightenment. (David Hume‚ n.d.‚ para. 3). He is seen as one of the greatest skeptics in the history of philosophy. He believes that human know nothing except their experience‚ and experience is based on the notion of objective. Moreover‚ in David Hume point

    Premium Inductive reasoning David Hume

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 50