2014 Topic 3: The Certainty that God Is After reading the two paragraphs written by scholars I have come to three different conclusions. The author of the first argument claims that God does in fact exist and he is also infinite. The author of the second argument claims that humans are not capable of comprehending the idea of infinite‚ therefore we cannot argue that God is infinite or that he exists at all. Finally‚ Descartes claims that by The Method of Doubt‚ God is the one idea that cannot be doubted
Premium Metaphysics Ontology Existence
that their theory is the best they are Descartes‚ Epictetus‚ and Leibniz. Descartes believes that reason is good for proving God exists and reason shows us we exist. Epictetus believes that reason is useful for proving what good actually is and that reason gives us freedom. Leibniz believes reason is good because it proves the existence of God and helps prove that our universe did not form by accident. Descartes believes that reason is good for proving that God exists. He starts proving this by saying
Premium Philosophy Metaphysics Epistemology
The Problems with Descartes Deductive Proofs for God Descartes “Meditations of First Philosophy” put forward two arguments for the existence of God‚ both of which are a priori. These arguments are the Trademark argument and the Ontological argument. I shall be describing these arguments then demonstrating that they are unsatisfying in proving God’s existence. To do this I shall be discussing criticisms put forward in response to both the Trademark and Ontological arguments. These criticisms I shall
Premium Metaphysics Ontology Existence
In addition‚ these changes can be further distinguished in Descartes belief that he can develop assertions of existence from his conception of ‘I think.’ For Descartes‚ res cogitans is established to be a finite substance. However‚ he concludes that an infinite substance‚ God‚ could not have originated in himself and therefore must be the cause of this idea‚ which results in God necessarily existing - ‘the idea that enables me to understand a supreme deity‚ eternal‚ infinite‚ omniscient‚ omnipotent
Premium Metaphysics Ontology Epistemology
When Descartes decided to tear down his beliefs and start fresh‚ he needed a foundation upon which to build his ideology. When judging what reality is‚ God must be considered. He/she must be taken out of a religious concept and proven to exist‚ exist in a way in which we cannot be deceived into only thinking is real. The proof of the existence of God in this way forms the backbone of Descartes’ further forays into proving what is reality. God‚ being the supremely powerful‚ all-knowing all-seeing
Premium God Metaphysics Ontology
Philosophy Essay (Descartes vs. Locke) Socrates once said‚ “As for me‚ all I know is that I know nothing.” Several philosophers contradicted Socrates’ outlook and believed that true knowledge was in fact attainable. This epistemological view however had several stances to it‚ as philosophers held different beliefs in regards to the derivation of true knowledge. Rationalists believed that the mind was the source of true knowledge‚ while in Empiricism‚ true knowledge derived from the senses. Rene
Premium Epistemology Metaphysics Mind
Is your mind the ultimate guide to happiness and truth‚ or is experiencing things for yourself the only way to find the true meaning of life? Or is living in a cave confined of your own ignorance your ideal way to live a happy life? In Descartes
Premium Mind Reality Truth
Descartes argument for the existence of God is based on two main principles. This is the principle of sufficient reasoning and the principle of adequate reality. The principle of sufficient reasoning means that everything has a cause. The principle of adequate reality is followed by sufficient reasoning and means that there must be at least as much reality in the cause as the effect. An example of having at least as much reality in the cause as the effect could be studying for a test and receiving
Premium Metaphysics Ontology Existence
Descartes’ Discourse on Method and Meditations Essay In Meditations on First Philosophy‚ Descartes discusses the existence of God. Descartes believes in God and provides two arguments that support his theory. His supporting evidence is that he possess a clear idea of God and second that any cause must be at least as great as it effect. Descartes convinces the reader hat he believes in God‚ but not that God exist. Descartes’ argument fails to be completely convincing because he assumes all people
Premium Metaphysics Ontology Epistemology
God‚ in all of his/her perfection‚ is very important in Descartes ’ philosophy. Reality and deception are big parts of Descartes philosophy‚ and to verify what reality is‚ God needs to be considered. God needs to be taken out of a religious context and be proven to exist in a way that we cannot be deceived into only thinking he ’s real. Religion had to be discarded completely during this proof so that Descartes can undoubtedly state that God does exist and that religious teaching had no influence
Premium Existence Ontology Theology