Why I am not a Christian is an essay by Bertrand Russell in which he explains the reasons why he does not call himself a Christian. He puts up several arguments concerning the existence of god which include the First Cause Argument‚ the Natural Law Argument‚ the Argument from Design and moral arguments. He also goes in to explaining the character of Christ and flaws in his teachings. He further goes in to explaining why he does not think that Christ was the best and the wisest of men. He believes
Premium Jesus Existence Logic
In the Article “Problems of Philosophy CH. XV The Value of Philosophy‚” Bertrand Russell talks about the value of the philosophy and why it should be studied. The author first distinguishes between science and philosophy. He argues that science seeks for definite knowledge whereas philosophy aims at the achievement of knowledge through questioning. With respect to definite answers‚ the value of the philosophy appears in its uncertainty. Many questions raised by philosophers are of the profoundest
Premium
and doubt is the absence of comprehension‚ and to an even greater extent‚ certainty. This desire to understand has given way to a multitude of discoveries and convictions throughout the course of human history. Although‚ William Lyon Phelps and Bertrand Russell had differing views on the nature of doubt and certainty it is only through the original state of doubt that one could gain the status of certainty- or at least to some degree. What qualifies as certainty itself is unstable‚ since every person
Premium Psychology Thought Human
similarities in that allow them to hold the position a “famous thinker.” Dr. Martin Luther King‚ Jr. (January 15‚ 1929-April 3‚ 1929) and Bertrand Russell (May 18‚ 1872-February 2‚ 1970) are two famous thinkers that are discussed in this paper. Each of these men changed the way people viewed the issues of the day through the creative process. King and Russell made identifiable contributions to society during an era of difficult social times. The subject matter of this paper will investigate dilemmas
Premium Logic Nonviolence Civil disobedience
Bertrand Russell is one of the greatest masters of English Prose. Bertrand Russell is one of the greatest masters of English Prose. He revolutionized not only the subject matter but also the mode of expression. He has in him a happy blend of greatest philosopher and a great writer. He was awarded Nobel Prize for literature in 1950. The subject matter of his essays may be very difficult but his manner of expression is so lucid and simple that even a layman can understand him without any special
Premium Poetry Fiction William Shakespeare
The purpose of this paper is to show that while Ernst Mach and Bertrand Russell share similar views on matter and knowledge‚ their end conclusions differ. Mach believes humans think in an economical manner where past experiences and knowledge are systematically reorganized to fit a pattern (Mach 211). Rather than analysing each experience in detail‚ humans refer to similar or related experiences as groups‚ which allows for the “least expenditure of thought” (Mach 197). In line with this mentality
Premium Mind Epistemology Ontology
Philosophy Essay (Descartes vs. Locke) Socrates once said‚ “As for me‚ all I know is that I know nothing.” Several philosophers contradicted Socrates’ outlook and believed that true knowledge was in fact attainable. This epistemological view however had several stances to it‚ as philosophers held different beliefs in regards to the derivation of true knowledge. Rationalists believed that the mind was the source of true knowledge‚ while in Empiricism‚ true knowledge derived from the senses. Rene
Premium Epistemology Metaphysics Mind
Descartes vs. Pascal For centuries‚ human beings have been debating over the validity of the use of reason. This is a very‚ very difficult subject to discuss‚ as one is forced to study something which is at that moment being used in their study. Two classic thinkers who contrasted on their view of reason were Descartes and Pascal. Though both saw reason as the primary source of knowledge‚ they disagreed over the competence of human reason. Descartes‚ the skeptic‚ said that we could use reason
Premium Epistemology Logic Truth
Descartes’ vs. Hospers Knowledge is an acquaintance with facts‚ truths‚ or principles‚ as from study of investigation and a familiarity or conversance‚ as with a particular subject or branch of learning. (3) Many philosophers have different perspectives of knowledge. Descartes’ believes that the only thing absolutely known is that you exist because you think. However‚ Hospers believes that there are different forms of knowing that must be proven with evidence. Descartes’ believes that you
Premium Epistemology Plato Truth
Term Paper‚ Philosophy 1107 Aaron Davis Evaluation & Comparison Between Descartes and Spinoza About The Paper: What I will do in this following paper is to discuss two very interesting philosophers‚ Rene Descartes and Benedictus de Spinoza. I will discuss each philosopher’s perspectives and insights on their most recognized theories and thoughts. I will then evaluate them and then give my opinion on the given topic. By doing this‚ I will contrast the similarities and
Premium God Metaphysics Atheism