While both Galileo and Descartes advocate a more mathematical natural philosophy‚ what they advocate greatly differ from one another. Overall‚ Galileo tries to relate objects in terms of proportions and uses more Archimedean principles like Archimedes’ work on floating bodies and his simple machines. Because of this‚ Galileo’s natural philosophy is mechanical. It is clear that Galileo strives to make natural philosophy a discipline of mathematics. He tries to make mathematics a more respectable science
Premium Scientific method Epistemology Logic
the works or David Hume and René Descartes come into play. Hume was a Scottish philosopher whose epistemological work revolved around the idea that our senses relay the truth to us. Descartes believed did not trust
Premium Philosophy Perception Epistemology
November 2016 PHIL 201.002 Essay Philosophy of Rene Descartes Rene Descartes was a philosopher of French descendent. He served in the Dutch Army for a good deal of his life until one day he had a dream about advancing physics and mathematics. Not to long after his dream Descartes wrote one of his more famous works Meditations on First Philosophy. The Meditations show his ideals on how we know who we are and what our purpose is for this life. Descartes states many ideals in his book Meditations of First
Premium Epistemology Metaphysics Plato
Throughout the past years we had great philosophers who expressed their studies and conclusions that made them very famous. Rene Descartes and John Locke were two philosophers that had the same idea‚ but different views of it. Descartes was a rationalist‚ which are people that argue that only reason can separate reality from illusion and give meaning to experience. The idea that eliminates reasoning can produce certain truths about reality and those important truths can be discovered without observations
Premium Mind Epistemology Metaphysics
Proving the Devine‚ Descartes Second Meditation For years scholars and philosophers have debated if god exists. One of the most prominent minds to attempt to tackle this problem was Rene Descartes. In Meditation III from his book Meditation on First Philosophy Descartes presents an argument for the existence of god. Descartes essentially argues that the idea of god has more reality then he dose and that therefore it couldn’t have originated from him or any other being with the same amount of reality
Premium Metaphysics Ontology Existence
Descartes and Hume are two very famous philosophers who had very distinct and competing beliefs about God. Descartes was a rationalist and Hume was an empiricist‚ therefore both had different restrictions on our ability to have knowledge on God. Rationalist claim that our knowledge is gained independently of sense experience. Empiricists claim that sense experience is the source of all our concepts and knowledge. In Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy‚ Descartes attempts to prove that there
Premium Metaphysics Epistemology Plato
Descartes’ reasons for believing in substance dualism relies on several arguments including his argument for certainty or knowledge. The argument relies on the idea that I can be certain of my mind but not my body or any other physical thing‚ so my mind is not a physical thing. In this paper‚ I will argue that Descartes’ assessment of the mind-body connection makes a jump in its logic by declaring that the mind cannot be physical‚ even though his certainty argument does not take into account that
Premium Mind René Descartes Metaphysics
Descartes and Augustine‚ in their respective examinations of the mind and God‚ come to the conclusion that the true understanding of all things derives from the withdrawal of the self from foreign influence and the necessity to look inward. Although each thinker’s journey or course of understanding was different‚ and at times rather contrasting‚ their ultimate realizations about knowledge are very coherent. Doubt is one of the primary focuses and a central aspect in examining the self for both Descartes
Premium Thought Mind Perception
Through Descartes first three meditations he arrives at a conclusion that the only things we know with absolute certainty are‚ that my own thoughts and god exist. He solidifies this stance by two foundational arguments laid out in the first meditation to build off of. I find that these arguments to reach these beliefs to be flawed by Descartes own reasoning and by scientific advancements made since his time. Before I can debate these arguments I need to outline Descartes purpose and reasoning for
Premium Epistemology Metaphysics Mind
us which logical possibility correctly describes reality; and as property dualism is just as logically possible as substance dualism‚ the latter cannot be the right account of the mind and body. What Descartes needs to show (to secure the success of his argument‚ i.e. demonstrate that the mind and the body are separate substances) is that it is logically impossible for the mind and body to be the same substance; but‚ as he fails to do this‚ I must reject his conceivability argument‚ and Cartesian
Premium Mind Metaphysics Philosophy of mind