Sarbane-Oxley Act 2002 and Federal Sentencing Guildelines for Organizations Ethics and compliance issues are nothing new. The U.S Federal Sentencing Guidelines for Organization instituted in 1991‚ and now the Sarbane-Oxley Act 2002 are aim to protect shareholders and other stakeholders from corporation misconduct. One of their goals is to require employees to report observed misconduct. In 2002‚ after accounting fraud at Enron and WorldCom‚ Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley to establish a system
Premium Enron Ethics Business ethics
sentence must coincide with the statutory guidelines e.g that set out in the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW)‚ and the judicial guidelines that set precedent for all judges and magistrates in the state. Within this legislation are the purposes for which a sentence may be imposed‚ types of penalties‚ minimum/maximum sentences and mandatory sentences. The purposes of sentencing are set out in the Crimes (Sentencing Procedures) Act 1999 (NSW) and fundamentally include deterrence‚ retribution
Premium Crime Criminal law
Critical Issues in the American Criminal Justice System: Sentencing Decisions and the Death Penalty Richard W Ramsay Dr. Allen Lowery CJ 6624 – Court Administration December 1‚ 2010 Abstract This paper discusses three critical issues in the criminal justice system. It touches on the general issues of punishment philosophies‚ sentence decision making‚ and prison overcrowding and focused more specifically on the negative effects of each. Highlighted in this informational paper
Premium Crime Criminal justice Prison
What are the main aims and objectives of sentencing within England and Wales? Should any one theory dominate? What are the main aims and objectives of sentencing within England and Wales? Should any one theory dominate? In the criminal justice system‚ there are many different sentences that can be given to an offender. According to the sentencing statistics in England and Wales (2009) the highest sentence being given is financial penalties with 67.3% of convicted offenders being given a fine
Free Crime Criminal justice
[pic] It is our policy to provide equal employment opportunities to all qualified persons without regard to race‚ color‚ religion‚ sex‚ national origin‚ age‚ disability or any other characteristic protected by state or federal law. Personal Information Date 4/15/2013[pic]8/1/11 Name Collins Falanda Jean Previous Name(s) N/A Present Address 200‚ cervantes village ‚ NM 88001 Permanent Address 200‚ cervantes village‚ NM 88001 Phone Number 575.805.8352 Alternative
Premium Employment
This paper will give detail of the different forms of punishment in the U.S. department of corrections system. It will discuss what the state and federal objectives are. It will also tell how sentencing affects the state and federal system overall. It will explain what determinate and indeterminate sentencing is and which one is most important from the writer’s aspect. Punishment in the U.S. Corrections Everyone has their own opinion when it comes to how someone should be punished. As a
Premium Crime Prison Criminal justice
Process of Law b. Trial- Judge and Supreme court roles c. Sentencing – 3 types Sentencing a. Determinate- pros and cons b. Indeterminate- pros and cons c. Mandatory- pros and cons d. Specific or general deterrence Determinate sentencing a. Time- Each punishment is set person to person regardless b. Punishment- does not discriminate c. Community- deter people from committing it again Indeterminate Sentencing a. Courts and judges role in helping the offender b. Community
Premium Prison Crime Sentence
Jurisdiction. Retrieved from: http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2011/08/what-is-the-purpose-of-federal-sentencing/ John Howard Society of Alberta. (1996). Prison Overcrowding. Retrieved from: http://www.johnhoward.ab.ca/pub/C42.htm State Department of Corrections. (2005). Agency Goals and Objectives. Retrieved from: http://www.dc.state.fl.us/pub/LRPP/2010/03-GoalsObjectivesOutcomes.pdf The Sentencing Project. (2011). The Expanding Federal Prison Population. Retrieved from: http://www.asca.net/sys
Premium Crime Prison Criminal justice
10‚ 2012 In this assignment I will define indeterminate and determinate sentencing. I will also support an argument that will be effective for addressing a crime. Finally I will summarize my assessment of the sentencing models. Indeterminate sentencing is the legal philosophy at the appropriate period of sentencing for a crime is to hold the offender as long as is appropriate to protect the community from an offender. An indeterminate sentencing philosophy holds the prisoner should on being
Premium Crime Criminal justice Criminology
century. This gave way to a new found focus on justice‚ and fairness in the 1970s. Crime control was the next practice of sentencing‚ this emphasized jail time as a way to reduce the crime in a community. During the 1980s-1990s this model of crime control was very popular. The emphasis on goals of the sentencing‚ and corrections policies‚ and practices can be characterized. Sentencing has four major goals that are normally attributed to it: deterrence‚ incapacitation‚ rehabilitation‚ and retribution
Premium Prison Penology Crime