ABSTRACT The nineteenth century decision of Rylands v Fletcher epitomises the continuing struggle between two opposing viewpoints of liability for industrial enterprises: strict liability based on the internalization of external costs‚ and a more laissez-faire fault-based approach. Subsequent confusion about the true nature of Rylands v Fletcher is due to the fact that the decision in fact contains two rules‚ a narrow one based on nuisance liability between neighbouring landowners‚ and a wider
Free Common law Law Tort
DEVELOPMENT: Development is associated with change. How the world‚ the people‚ the economic‚ the society and technology changes. How it improves with time. Between the 1950’s and 2000’s the analyst has characterized this time as the “age of Development”. After World War most of the world international development became a formal focus in the international relations. We see Development as good to the world that will make the world better‚ however in the Compiling second edition of the
Premium Developed country United States Asia
perform the greatest ability to protect all members of a society. In the case of Miranda v Arizona‚ the courts had to decide whether or not a man was deprived of his freedoms while in police custody. Basically Miranda v Arizona completely changed the way police apprehend and interrogate suspects. However it was not only Miranda‚ but many other instances where the majority has not protected all minorities. Vignera v New York was another similar instance where a suspect was forced to sign statements
Premium Miranda v. Arizona Supreme Court of the United States Police
Opinion on the Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue Case As the opinion delivered by Justice Stevens‚ the U.S. Supreme Court intended to answer the significant question in Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue‚ Inc. (Mosley case) that “whether objective proof of actual injury to the economic value of a famous mark is a requisite for relief under the 1996 Federal Trademark Dilution Act (FTDA)”. 1 Contrary to lower courts’ holdings‚ the Supreme Court stated in a unanimous decision that it is not enough to claim
Premium Trademark Property Supreme Court of the United States
right of any United States citizen accused of crimes the right to counsel in criminal procedure and their defense. To understand this process‚ one must understand the developments for the right to counsel‚ self-representation‚ and the roles of an attorney and when the right to counsel is attached. Development of Right to Counsel In the 16th and 17th century‚ the law did not allow or provide for the use of attorneys in any court case‚ except for treason cases. It wasn’t until
Premium United States Constitution Law United States
Tennessee v. Reeves. 917 S.W.2d 825 (Supreme Court of Tennessee‚ 1996) On January 5‚ 1993‚ Tracie Reeves and Molly Coffman‚ spoke on the telephone and decided to kill their homeroom teacher‚ Janice Geiger. Reeves and Coffman were both twelve years old and were students at West Carroll Middle School. They planned that Coffman would bring rat poison to school the following days and it would be put in Geiger’s drink. After that‚ the two would steal Geiger’s vehicle and drive to the Smoky Mountains
Premium Court Teacher Appeal
Development The more you know about children’s academic‚ social‚ and emotional development‚ the more able you will be to meet their needs. Knowing about how well a child is progressing helps to plan the teaching for that child or class. You want the children in the class to feel successful and confident‚ but you also want to offer experiences that will help them to develop further. By checking the children’s progress‚ it becomes easy to identify those children who need special help or who face extra
Premium Individualized Education Program The Child Child
The case of Wauchop v. Domino ’s Pizza‚ Inc. involves a wrongful death suit on behalf of a family at the hands of an employee of a Domino ’s Pizza franchise. In this instance the defendants named were the company itself‚ the president‚ the franchise owner‚ and the driver of the deliver vehicle involved. The plaintiffs claim that the 30-minute delivery policy was the cause of the accident resulting in the death of the woman. The plaintiff filed a motion for default judgment against Thomas Monaghan
Premium Civil procedure Judgment Plaintiff
A. Kelly v Movie Theater: Negligence Negligence requires a showing that a duty was owed‚ that the duty was breached‚ and that the breach was the actual and proximate cause of damages. Special Duty – Land Occupier - Invitee A special duty arises in circumstances involving a land occupier. An invitee is one who enters the land with the owner’s permission for the purpose related to the activity. The landowner owes an invitee a duty of care to inspect and discover any dangerous condition
Premium Tort Law Tort law
and Mr. Hyde by Robert Louis Stevenson‚ Double Vision by Pat Barker‚ an article "The Duality in Gothic Fiction" by Murel Bailey‚ the Wikipedia entry of “Two-Face”‚ the 1963 film‚ The Nutty Professor‚ and the 2003 film‚ The Hulk all demonstrate this struggle in a most extreme way. The novel The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde‚ by Robert Louis Stevenson proves that the battle between good and evil is real in a vivid way within Dr. Jekyll or Mr. Hyde. Stevenson writes that Dr. Jekyll starts
Premium Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde Robert Louis Stevenson Novella