Discuss the concepts of limit and predatory pricing. Explain how imperfect knowledge of other firms’ costs or financial conditions can lead to limit or predatory pricing. Limit pricing is when an incumbent firm sets a “low price with the purpose of deterring entry”. Predatory pricing is when an incumbent sets an “‘irrationally’ low price [possibly below cost] so other firms can’t compete” forcing existing firms to exit the market. Both pricing strategies require at least two periods: the first to
Premium Game theory Economics Pricing
Cost Classification and Pricing Student Name Student University Cost and Price Analysis Cost Classification and Pricing Cost Classification According to Maher‚ L. (2005)‚ cost classification refers to the separation of different expenses in various categories. The classifications of costs are required for any firm in order to accurately track and account for the allocation of varies types of cost categories. For Hawk-eye‚ cost classification is crucial since it plays an important part in
Premium Costs Cost Cost accounting
Transfer pricing is a profit allocation method (the other being formulary apportionment) used to attribute a multinational corporation’s net profit (or loss) before tax to countries where it does business. Since countries impose different corporation tax rates‚ the corporation’s goal is to allocate more of the worldwide profit to lower tax countries‚ thereby minimizing the overall taxes paid. Many countries impose penalties on corporations if they consider that they are being deprived of taxable
Premium Tax Transfer pricing
Dichotomous Asset Pricing Model Evidence from the UK market 1. Introduction Ever since its introduction by Sharpe-Lintner-Black‚ the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) has been subject to criticism‚ appraisal and continuous efforts for improvement‚ such as the Reward Beta approach (Bornholt‚ 2007)‚ conditional CAPM or the consumption CAPM. The Dichotomous Asset Pricing Model (DAPM)‚ introduced by Professor Liang Zou at the Universiteit van Amsterdam‚ brings a fresh approach to asset pricing and contributes
Premium Financial markets
TAXATION RATING 6/10 advantages: -Higher price --> less supplied and consumed of demerit goods. Increase in consumer welfare. -Government gains revenue. -Tax receipts can be used to further help with problem e.g. Taxing alcoholic drinks and using the receipts to add funding to the NHS or policing. Disadvantages: -If demand is very income inelastic (e.g. cigarettes) then consumption would not greatly reduce-> potential for black market. If consumption does remain the same then taxation is just
Premium Welfare economics Market failure Externality
NIKE MARKETING CHALLENGE Contents 1. Introduction: Section: 1.1: Summary 1.2: Historical goals in Marketing 1.3: History and development of the company 2. Marketing activities Section: 2.1: Innovation 2.2: SWOT 2.3: Marketing mix 2.4: Targeting strategy 3. Recommendation and conclusion
Premium Marketing Nike, Inc.
price: selecting the pricing objective‚ determining demand‚ estimating costs‚ analyzing competitors costs‚ prices and offers‚ selecting a pricing method and selecting the final price‚ Singapore GP Pte Ltd employed 2 different pricing strategies. They are 1. Price discounts and allowances 2. Differentiated Pricing Promotional pricing was not used in the sale of the FORMULA 1™ SingTel Singapore Grand Prix tickets as none of the techniques: lost-leader pricing‚ special-event pricing‚ cash rebates‚ low-interest
Premium Pricing Discounts and allowances Marketing
Dynamic Pricing in the Airline Industry R. Preston McAfee and Vera te Velde California Institute of Technology Abstract: Dynamic price discrimination adjusts prices based on the option value of future sales‚ which varies with time and units available. This paper surveys the theoretical literature on dynamic price discrimination‚ and confronts the theories with new data from airline pricing behavior. Correspondence to: R. Preston McAfee‚ 100 Baxter Hall‚ California Institute of Technology‚
Premium Economics Pricing Supply and demand
Managerial Economics Unit 10 Unit 10 Pricing under Imperfect Competition Structure: 10.1 Introduction Case Let Objectives 10.2 Monopoly 10.3 Price Discrimination under Monopoly 10.4 Bilateral Monopoly 10.5 Monopolistic Competition 10.6 Oligopoly 10.7 Collusive Oligopoly and Price Leadership 10.8 Duopoly 10.9 Industry Analysis 10.10 Summary 10.11 Glossary 10.12 Terminal Questions 10.13 Answers 10.14 Case Study Reference/E-Reference 10.1 Introduction In the previous
Premium Monopoly
CAPM vs. APT Asset Pricing Model are very useful tools that enable financial annalists or just simply independent investors evaluate the risk in an specific investment and at the same time set a specific rate of return with respect the amount of risk of an individual investment or a portfolio. The CAPM method while simpler than the ATP method takes into consideration the factor of time and does not get too wrapped up over the Systematic risk factors that sometimes we can not control. In this paper
Premium Investment