to preventive-detention laws passed under Arts. 149 and 150‚ with the result that persons detained under such security legislation‚ as well as persons arrested under the ordinary criminal law‚ enjoy many of the rights contained in Art. 5.4 The difference is that legislation may be inconsistent with Art.5 and yet remain constitutionally valid. The law relating to preventive detention is of such importance for personal liberty in Malaysia that it is dealt with separately below. The phrase “save in
Premium Law Human rights Common law
INQUEST INTO THE DEATH OF VANESSA ANDERSON. WESTMEAD FILE. NO. 161/2007. Appearances. Gail Furness‚ Counsel‚ instructed by Emma Sullivan‚ Solicitor of the State Crown Solicitors Office‚ Counsel assisting the Coroner. Michael Williams‚ SC‚ instructed by McLaughlin & Riordan for Mr & Mrs Anderson and the family of Vanessa Anderson. Anna Katzmann of Counsel‚ instructed by Leitch Hassan Dent‚ Solicitors for the Royal North Shore Hospital and Doctors Nicole Williams‚ Azizi Bakar‚ Galina Palachevskaia
Premium Head injury
The issue is whether the defendant Sykt Jebat can be held liable for the damages suffered by the plaintiffs‚ Sam‚ Jojo and Lan under the law of Occupiers’ Liability. Occupiers’ liability concerns injury caused to a plaintiff as a result of defective condition of the land‚ building and premises. In order to establish occupiers’ liability‚ the occupier must have a sufficient degree of control over the premise. Lord Denning in Wheat v Lacon & Co Ltd (1966) held that “whenever a person has a sufficient
Premium Tort law Standard of care Duty of care
This case is in regards to the tort of negligence‚ with the central issue being causation. With the evidence provided‚ it is necessary to determine whether Vera and PC Webster are owed a duty of care and subsequently have any claims. Firstly‚ the ’but for’ test is to be applied‚ in which the courts ask: ’but for the defendant’s action‚ would the damage have occurred?’ The courts have accepted that drivers automatically owes a duty of care to every other road user ‚ including pedestrians. Jack’s
Premium Law Tort Tort law
He would like to claim for such economic loss of $50‚000. In addition‚ Peter expects to claim for medical expenses of $10‚000 and loss of income of $20‚000 for the duration of the injury. REQUIRED: Advise Peter of his legal rights under the law of torts. (Maximum word length: 1‚000 words) Question 2 (10 marks) On Monday‚ Aaron wrote a letter to Ben offering 300 bags of cement at $100 per bag. On Wednesday‚ Ben received the letter of offer from Aaron and posted a reply letter to Aaron in which
Premium Tort Week-day names
Given that Ms. Shraud was stern with her‚ therefore‚ she was apprehensive and nervous about asking questions. When Ms. New went to scan the letters‚ Ms. New Incidentally made an error and scanned a document in with another patient. That data loaded into the patient appeal records unbeknownst to me. Ms. New was from work on Wednesday‚ upon her return‚ the day progressed with a lot more caseloads as Taryn tasks more audit and appeals cases to Ms. New. Earlier Ms. New went to the bathroom and left
Premium The Work Left-wing politics
classified according to the textbook as an intentional tort against persons but could be put into intentional tort against property. Torts against persons are intentional acts that harm an individual’s physical or mental integrity (Kubasek‚ pg. 111). A person who is legally injured may be able to use tort law to recover damages from someone who is legally responsible‚ or “liable‚” for those injuries. According to the case‚ Prudence’s physical integrity was harmed
Premium Abuse Child abuse Bullying
damage to the plaintiff is foreseeable‚ the defendant is liable for all the damage that results directly from the negligence and even applies to a plaintiff who was not within the reasonable foresight of the defendant. However due to the conflict between this proposition and the neighbour principle laid down in Donohue v Stevenson and the general reluctance of the courts to make the defendants liability limitless‚ this proposition was soon rejected. The current test of remoteness used by the courts
Premium Tort law Duty of care Plaintiff
Nuisance where the defendant’s actions "materially affects the reasonable comfort and convenience of life of a class of plaintiff’s subjects" "any continuous activity or state of affairs causing a substantial and unreasonable interference with a [claimant’s] land or his use or enjoyment of that land" Only those who have a legal interest in the affected land can sue Public nuisance concerns protecting the public private nuisance‚ which protects an individual. SAME** SLIDE 4:
Premium Tort Law
MGT320 5/19/2012 Conversion under Tort Law The layman’s definition for conversion is basically considered theft; according to our text “whenever a person wrongfully possesses or uses the personal property of another without permission” is considered conversion…..”deprives an owner of personal property or of the use of that property without that owner’s permission”. On March 28 of this
Premium Property Criminal law Theft