G.R. No. 185122 August 16‚ 2010 WENSHA SPA CENTER‚ INC. and/or XU ZHI JIE‚ Petitioners‚ vs. LORETA T. YUNG‚ Respondent. A petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court filed by an employer who was charged before the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) for dismissing an employee upon the advice of a Feng Shui master. Facts: Wensha Spa Center‚ Inc. (Wensha) in Quezon City is in the business of sauna bath and massage services. Xu Zhi Jie a.k.a. Pobby
Premium Employment Termination of employment Legal terms
Chavez vs. Romulo G.R. No. 157036‚ June 9‚ 2004A mere license is always revocable FACTS: This case is about the ban on the carrying of firearms outside of residence in order to deter the rising crime rates. Petitioner questions the ban as a violation of his right to property ISSUE: Whether or not the revocation of permit to carry firearms is unconstitutional and Whether or not the right to carry firearms is a vested property right HELD: Petitioner cannot find solace to the above-quoted
Premium Law United States Constitution Property law
PHILIPPINE JURISPRUDENCE - FULL TEXT The Lawphil Project - Arellano Law Foundation G.R. Nos. 138934-35 January 16‚ 2002 THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES vs. ANTHONY ESCORDIAL | | | |[pic] | |Republic of the Philippines | |SUPREME COURT
Premium Negros Occidental
DOCTRINE: Press freedom may be identified with the liberty to discuss publicly and truthfully any matter of public concern without censorship or punishment. The general principle is that freedom of expression is the rule and restrictions the exemption. The power to exercise prior restraint is not to be presumed‚ rather the presumption is against its validity. FACTS: * The principal petitioner is Jose Antonio U. Gonzalez‚ President of the Malaya Films. * The respondent is the Board
Premium Freedom of speech Censorship
AGENCY‚ PARTNERSHIP AND TRUSTS DIGESTS (2013 – 2014) ATTY. JOAQUIN OBIETA G.R. No. L-45441 MORA ELECTRIC CO. vs. MATIC June 26‚ 1939 J.: Petitioner: Mora Electric Co.‚ Inc. Respondents: Paulino Matic and Benita Quiogue Vda. Del Rosario ISSUE: FACTS: Matic obtained from Manila City a concession to provide the lighting system of Manila cemeteries on All Souls’ Day of 1934. The amount was P8‚773 to be guaranteed by Luzon Surety Co. Matic then authorized Quiogue to contract with Mora
Free Manila Metro Manila Quezon City
KATE FITZPATRICK YEAR TWELVE BIOLOGY TERM ONE _(www.happycow.net)_ "TO TEST THE EFFECTS OF ANTACIDS ON PEPSIN’S ABILITY TO DIGEST PROTEIN." _CONTENTS_ 1.0 Abstract Pg 2.0 Introduction · 2.1 Aim · 2.2 Background Information · 2.3 Hypothesis PG · Pg · Pg · pg 3.0 MATERIALS · 3.1 Equipment · 3.2 Chemicals PG · Pg · Pg 4.0 METHOD · 4.1 Variables · 4.2 Procedure PG · Pg · Pg 5.0 RESULTS · 5.1 Sample calculation · 5.2 Tables · 5.3 Graphs · 5.4 Photos PG · Pg · Pg · Pg
Premium Hydrochloric acid PH Gastric acid
si Basilan Estates‚ Inc vs CIR & CTA GR L-22492; Sept 5‚ 1967 Bengzon‚ J.P. Facts: 1. Basilan Estate‚ Inc. a Philippine corporation engaged in coconut industry filed in 1954 its income tax returns for 1953 and paid an income tax of P8‚028 2. On February 26‚ 1959‚ the Commissioner of Internal Revenue‚ assessed Basilan Estates‚ Inc a deficiency income tax of a. P3‚912 for 1953 and b. P86‚867.85 as 25% surtax on unreasonably accumulated profits as of 1953 pursuant to Section 25
Premium Depreciation Tax Taxation in the United States
Rick Richards‚ et ux. v. Commissioner Facts: The petitioners‚ Mr. Richards and Mrs. Richards‚ Issues: 1. Whether petitioner (both Mr. Richards and Mrs. Richards) conducted their writing or acting activities with the objective of making a profit within the meaning of §186? 2. Whether petitioners have substantiated the ordinary and necessary business expense of these activities? 3. Whether petitioners are entitled to carry forward a net operating loss from a prior tax year 4. Whether petitioners
Premium Law Legal terms Civil procedure
LUMIQUED VS EXEVEA 282 SCRA 125 FACTS: Arsenio P. Lumiqued was dismissed from his position as the Regional Director of the Department of Agrarian Reform-Cordillera Autonomous Region (DAR-CAR). The dismissal was the aftermath of 3 affidavit-complaints filed by private respondent and DAR-CAR cashier Jeannette Obar-Zamudio. The affidavit-complaints charged Lumiqued with malversation due to falsifying gas receipts for reimbursements‚ violation of COA’s rules and regulations on concealing unliquidated
Premium Law United States Constitution Lawyer
WEEK 9 – Agency distinguished from Sale (Art. 1458) Andres Quiroga vs Parsons Hardware Co. 38 Phil. 501 G.R. No. L-11491 Subject: Sales Doctrine: Contract of Agency to Sell vs Contract of Sale Facts: On Jan 24‚ 1911‚ plaintiff and the respondent entered into a contract making the latter an “agent” of the former. The contract stipulates that Don Andres Quiroga‚ here in petitioner‚ grants exclusive rights to sell his beds in the Visayan region to J. Parsons. The contract only stipulates that
Premium Contract Pleading Complaint