Roberta broker never stated which shares of stock was actually sold. Furthermore‚ Roberta oral instructions never specified which specific shares of stocks she wanted to be sold. In the relevant court case Helvering v. Rankin‚ 295 U.S. 123 (1935)‚ the court decided: "When shares of stock in a corporation are sold from lots purchased at different dates and at different prices‚ and the identity of the lots cannot be determined‚ the stock sold shall be charged
Premium Generally Accepted Accounting Principles Balance sheet Investment
refuse to provide those things to their workers. This is where the Greens family is furious to give these types of protection to their workers‚ so they sued. This case was called Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores‚ Inc. The family is going against employment-based health care plans that are under the patient
Premium Christianity Religion God
government forms such as tax returns and immigration papers is considered an act of unauthorized practice of law. In The Florida Bar v. Furman‚ the Court stated that Ms. Furman went beyond just transposing information from an intake sheet to a form‚ she was explaining legal remedies‚ construing and interpreting legal effects‚ giving advice on how best
Premium Law Tax Taxation in the United States
Bily v. Arthur Young & Co.‚ 834P. 2d 745 – Cal: Supreme Court 1992 Summary of the case The litigation was brought by investors of Osborne Computer Corp. a computer manufacturing company. The business was founded in 1980 by Adam Osborne. The Company grew rapidly‚ and by fall of 1982‚ sales reached $10 million per month‚ making the company one of the fastest growing enterprises in the history of American business. Late in 1982‚ Osborne planned an initial public stock offering. In the process
Premium United States United Kingdom
Problems began arising with the death penalty on February 18‚ 1972 with the People v. Anderson case. This is a case in which the California Supreme Court declared the death penalty cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the state constitution. This case caused all capital punishment sentences to be changed to life in prison without parole. “As a result‚ 107 inmates were taken off death row and resentenced.” (Propositions). This would be the start of an ongoing battle with the California Supreme
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States United States Constitution
Derek Brown Dr. Janet Smith Employment Law BA370 30 June 2011 EEOC V. FEDERAL EXPRESS The EEOC filed suit complaining that FedEx violated Title I of the ADA by failing to provide reasonable accommodations and for discharging him in retaliation for his discrimination complaint. Additionally‚ the complaint sought compensatory damages (i.e.‚ damages paid to compensate the claimant for actual injury or harms they suffered) and punitive damages (i.e.‚ exemplary damages paid to penalize the defendant)
Premium United States Employment Law
In the case of United States V. Parks‚ I think he should’ve been charged for the criminal offense of negligence. I understand that he believed he had designated competent employees to take charge of ensuring the proper sanitation of the warehouse and its products‚ however‚ he admitted at trial of having knowledge of unsanitary working conditions in one of his warehouses thanks to a warning letter from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Failing to take corrective action is also a violation of
Premium Fraud Ethics Law
right in arresting the individuals. This relates to this case because like the cocaine‚ the cigarette burns are in plain view when they invited into the residents. Although there is no direct evidence that Joe’s cigarettes were the cause of Sam’s abuse‚ it is a logical presumption to conclude since he was the one possessing the Marlboros. This case can similarly be connected to the Draper v. United States 358 U.S. 307 (1958). In the Draper case‚ the arresting officer had probable cause to arrest petitioner
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Credibility Probable cause
Case Legal Brief Case: Mullins V. Parkview Hospital (2007) Facts: At a teaching hospital‚ Mullins who is the plaintiff marked or ticked the section of approval form that consented to “the presence of healthcare learners”. She was assured by the attending Anaesthesiologist that she would handle the anaesthesia. However‚ when Mullins was unconscious during the surgery‚ a student (VanHoey) was allowed by the Anaesthesiologist to perform intubation. Mullins’ oesophagus was lacerated by VanHoey as
Premium United States Appeal Tort
1. Case 9-1: Facebook v. Winklevosses The settlement agreement is enforceable. Based on the four necessary conditions on constructing a valid (bilateral contract in this case) contract: (1) Agreement: Winklevosses agreed that he has “no further right to assert against Facebook” and “no further claims against Facebook and its related parties” in exchange for cash and Facebook stock from Zuckerberg (promise for a promise); (2) Consideration: What Zuckerberg offered was a legal value in exchange for
Premium Contract Contract law Offer and acceptance