stock market. In our project‚ we have made use of event study methodology to assess the accuracy of stock price reaction of 39 public listed Indian companies in National Stock Exchange (BSE) in the year 2006 and onwards. The abnormal returns (actual returns-returns from regression line) results were taken for 20 days before and after the announcement date to test whether the result is significant or not (Level of significance=5%). The project shows that there is no significance difference in the
Premium Stock market
----Specialty retailer Industry 2. Commercial banking ----Commercial banks Industry 3. Pharmaceutical preparations ----Pharmaceuticals Industry 4. Commercial airline ----Aerospace and defense Industry 5. Computer software ----Network & other comm. Equip. Industry 6. IT service provider ----Internet services and retailing Industry 7. Liquor producer and distributor ----Beverages Industry 8. Integrated oil and gas
Premium Retailing Bank Supermarket
To understand how the Basic Industries has achieved its return on equity over the past ten years‚ I have prepared Du Pont Analysis (Exhibit I). Return on Equity (without minority interest) has declined from 16.04% in 1985 to 17.47% in 1994. The main reason for the decline seems to be fall in Return on assets from 8.26% in 1985 to 6.87% in 1994. Therefore‚ Basic Industries has not been able to utilize its assets properly to produce its earnings. The fall in Return on Asset has been to an extent
Premium Financial ratios
The Airline Industry Annise Hawkins Strayer University ECO 550 Dr. Youngblood January 28‚ 2012 According to First Research (2010)‚ the main products or service in the industry is air transportation. This includes the scheduled or unscheduled transportation of passengers‚ mail or cargo. The bulk of the revenues in the industry (estimated by first research (2010) to be 70% of total revenues) come from the scheduled transportation of passengers. Cargo and express mail contribute
Premium Airline Delta Air Lines Southwest Airlines
The earlier analysis proved that Alpha’s return of assets (on a before-tax basis) significantly lower compared to Gamma. This is because Alpha does not have sufficient pure profit. This was also due to lower operating profit margin which tells us that Alpha is not generating sufficient return. To help Alpha‚ the possible solution to advise to Alpha is to identify the non-performing assets in the balance sheet and to study the financial statements to identify specific assets or groups of assets that
Premium Investment Balance sheet Financial ratios
Chapter 6 Industry Analysis True/False Questions T F 1. The first step in the top-down approach to stock valuation is analyzing the position of the industry in its life cycle. Answer: False T F T F T F T F T F 6. Industry life cycles measure the growth path of an industry through five stages. Answer: True T F 7. Industry life cycles predict an industry’s sensitivity to the economy. Answer: False T F 2. The method of starting the stock valuation
Premium Stock Industry Economics
plotted the returns of Selleck & Company against those of the market and found that the slope of your line was negative‚ the CAPM would indicate that the required rate of return on Selleck’s stock should be less than the risk-free rate for a well-diversified investor‚ assuming that the observed relationship is expected to continue in the future. a. True b. False (24.5) Beta coefficient FN Answer: a EASY . If the returns of two firms
Premium
Contents AUTHORISATION………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..i ACKNOWLEDGEMENT……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..iii 1. INTRODUCTION 2 1.1 PURPOSE OF REPORT 2 1.2 PHASE I 2 1.3 PHASE II 3 1.4 PHASE III 3 2.1 HOW THE ASSET DEVELOPED IS LINKED WITH TCS? 6 2.2 ROLE OF TCS IN THE SHIPPING WORLD 7 2.3 TCS IMPLEMENTING ERP AT KOCHI PORT 12 3. PHASE I – ASSET REVIEW AND CERTIFICATION COURSE 13 4. PHASE
Premium Ship Containerization Ship transport
Examining Stock Returns for Normal Distributions July11‚ 2012 Part A. A1 (CRSP 2000-2008) | VW Daily | EW Daily | VW Monthly | EW Monthly | Mean | 0.00% | 0.05% | -0.12% | 0.50% | σ | 1.35% | 1.12% | 4.66% | 6.14% | Table A1 shows return means and standard deviations for the CRSP market portfolio from 2000-2008. In comparing daily vs monthly returns in both cases‚ equally weighted (EW) and value weighted (VW)‚ Table A1 shows the mean and standard deviation are
Premium Normal distribution Standard deviation Dow Jones Industrial Average
years_option=all_years&periods_option=specific_periods&periods=Annual+Data http://financeandinvestments.blogspot.com/2011/05/historical-annual-returns-for-s-500.html Jain‚ Rajiv‚ and Daniel Kranson. "The Myth of GDP and Stock Market Returns."2009. Web. 4 Mar. 2012. <http://www.virtus.com/vsitemanager/Upload/Docs/6141_GDPwhitepaper.pdf>. Rao‚ Rama. "Forecasting Future Returns." Financial Physics. N.p.‚ n.d. Web. 5 Mar 2012. <http://www.financialphysics.net/future.html>. Bekaert‚ Geert‚ and Campbell
Premium Stock market Economic growth Gross domestic product