“How far would sociologists agree that the media causes eating disorders in women? In this essay I will discuss how far sociologists would agree that the media causes eating disorders in women. Eating disorders refer to a group of conditions characterized by abnormal eating habits that may involve either insufficient or excessive food intake to the damage of an individual’s physical and emotional health. Eating disorders include: bulimia‚ anorexia and obesity. First Marxists would argue all
Premium
that the nuclear family is no longer the norm. A conventional nuclear family consists of a traditional setting. A husband‚ wife and one or more children living together under the same roof. As such‚ the customary breadwinner would be the husband‚ while the wife is responsible for the housework and the emotional welfare of the children. But in today’s society‚ a nuclear family is seen as one of many family types in modern day society. There are some sociologists that say the nuclear family is and
Premium Marriage Family
Assess the view that the nuclear family is no longer the norm. (24 marks) In this essay I will be assessing the view of different sociologists concerning the question ‘is the nuclear family no longer the norm?’‚ from this essay I should be able to conclude if it is in fact still the norm or not. First of all‚ in 1969 the Divorce Reform Act was put into place which enabled people to get a divorce easily compared to before. With this law people could simply say that the marriage wasn’t working out
Premium Family
Family 4 mark questions Explain what sociologists mean by primary socialisation. Explain what sociologists mean by authority relationships in families. Explain what sociologists mean by a reconstituted family. Explain what sociologists mean by a traditional nuclear family. Explain what sociologists mean by an extended family. Family 5 mark questions Describe one family type found in Britain and explain how it is different from any one other family type. Describe one way in which an
Premium Family Nuclear family
Assess the view that the nuclear family is no longer the norm. The nuclear family was commonly seen in many countries of the world due to its practicality and replaced the extended family in most societies. The nuclear family is defined by George Peter Murdock as a married male and female couple raising one or more children in one household. This structure became the norm in modern society as it fulfils Murdock’s 4 functions of the family: Sexual; helps maintain a healthy and stable relationship
Premium Family Extended family
the nuclear family is no longer the norm There is controversy between sociologists concerning the idea that the nuclear family is no longer considered ‘normal’ in this modern age. The contrast of theories from sociologists causes issues when attempting to find out whether the nuclear family is a norm or not; despite the increased divorce rates. The nuclear family was common during the late 19th century and consisted of two generations; parents and children. However‚ the nuclear family has
Premium Family Mother Nuclear family
that the conventional nuclear family remains the norm in Britain today. [24 marks] Sociologist Edmund Leech (1967) defined the nuclear family as the ‘cereal packet norm’ due to often appearing in advertisements for breakfast cereals. This type of family consisted of a male provider‚ enhancing the patriarchy with a female homemaker‚ along with their dependent children‚ originally assumed as the ideal family by Hilary Land. Talcott Parsons believes that the conventional family type alters depending
Premium Family Nuclear family Marriage
Discuss how far sociologists would agree that teenage criminal and deviant behaviour results from parents failing to socialise their children correctly (12 marks) Most criminologists would agree that the majority of criminal and/or deviant behaviour both stems and/or develops during either childhood or the early years of adolescence. Therefore‚ many how deduced that the adequacy of socialising in the home by parents is likely to have an effect and possible even result in teenage criminal and deviant
Premium Sociology Adolescence
“There is no such thing as Natural Good.” Discuss how far you agree. Many say that natural law means observable law relating to natural experience and also a body of unchanging moral principles regarded as a basis for all human conduct. There is believed to be two main meanings to natural law‚ one by St. Thomas Aquinas‚ and another by Aristotle. However Aquinas based his theory on the theory of Aristotle. Aristotle believed that what is a natural good can be found through our experience‚ and our
Free Aristotle Thomas Aquinas Natural law
How far do sociologists agree that education benefits the ruling class? The debate outlined above suggests that some sociologists believe that education benefits the ruling class‚ however other sociologists may argue that education benefits everyone or just men. To address this issue I will be looking at both sides of the argument and I will assess to what extent sociologists agree that education benefits the ruling class. Some sociologists; such as Marxist agree with the statement above
Premium Sociology Social class Working class