courts. A useful starting point is the definition found in the Civil Evidence Act 1995 section 1‚ which‚ bearing in mind that it only applies to hearsay in civil cases‚ is one of the nearest to a clear definition of hearsay. The definition itself is based on common law cases‚ which form the basis of how hearsay evidence is treated in criminal cases; Under section 1(2) of the Act - Hearsay evidence can be thought of as "any statement made otherwise than by a person while giving oral evidence in the proceedings
Premium Evidence law Criminal law Probable cause
can get her she is recaptured and sent back to camp. The other girls keep walking along the rabbit-proof fence until it runs out‚ but they don’t lose hope‚ they keep walking until it continues and they can feel their home. They are then reunited with their mother and grandmother after 9 weeks of walking to get home. This is when the epilogue begins to give us details after. Symbolism: RABBIT-PROOF FENCE – the fence is referring to the actual fence but is very symbolic because it is built by whites
Premium Family Rabbit-Proof Fence English-language films
As a result of Lydia’s actions‚ Danielle and Gemma have died. Therefore‚ the extent of Lydia’s criminal liability for their deaths must be explored. Lydia’s culpability for their Murders must be explored before lesser offences of manslaughter can be considered. The majority of law pertaining to Murder is found in the Common Law‚ rather than being defined in statutes like a great deal of criminal offences. Murder‚ as defined by Lord Coke‚ is when a man of “sound memory” at the age of “discretion”
Premium Criminal law Manslaughter
traditions onto the indigenous peoples. In the book Things Fall Apart by Chinua Achebe‚ Christian missionaries came to Nigeria- specifically where the Igbo tribe was located‚ and imposed their religion and culture upon them. Similarly‚ in the film Rabbit Proof Fence directed by Philip Noyce‚ the colonial government of Australia put in
Premium Chinua Achebe Things Fall Apart Igbo people
States laws prohibit violence and provides consequences to deter it. If one commits an act of violence on another person‚ depending on the severity‚ they are arrested and most of them are sent to jail or prison. Though the criminal justice system removes these violent criminals from the streets making them no longer a threat to the public‚ this does not prevent them from committing violence against other offenders. As the prison system’s inmate population in the United States has grown well beyond
Premium Prison Crime Criminal justice
II. CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE Crown Court was established on 1 January 1972 by Courts Act 1971 to replace the Assize Courts and quarter sessions. Court of England and Wales Crown is‚ with the High Court and Court of Appeal‚ one aspect of the Senior Courts of England and Wales. It is the superior court of first instance in criminal cases; However‚ for some purposes Crown Court is hierarchically subordinate to the High Court and its divisional courts. Crown Court performs four main types of activity:
Premium Law Judge Jury
loss. 2. A breach of duty is when someone’s unreasonable conduct endangers someone to whom they owe a duty of care to. 4. The standard of care in most negligence cases is the degree of care that the law requires in a particular case. In most cases‚ the standard is reasonableness. What an ordinary prudent person would do under the same or similar circumstances. The standard of care is the way in which we measure the breach of duty that leads to negligence liability. 5. Some of the factors that help
Premium Tort Law Tort law
disease of the mind‚ this is known as insane automatism which results in a special verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity. The defence of non-insane automatism‚ if successfully pleaded‚ acts as a complete defence absolving the defendant of all criminal liability. It differs from the defence of insane automatism in that there is no power to detain in a mental hospital neither may any other order be made against the defendant. The defence of non-insane automatism exists where a person commits a crime
Premium Criminal law Causality Consciousness
does not seem to not apply to black men. The system has always been judging black men because of what color their skin is on the outside. In the article “Michael Brown and Black Men”‚ Charles Blow showed a black man can be unarmed and still be killed. The film‚ The Central Park Five‚ proves that if you are a black or latino boy in the wrong place at the wrong time‚ especially if it involves a white women being raped‚ you are automatically guilty. Our system has found many ways to convict African Americans
Premium Race Black people African American
When police officers are not punished for behaving inappropriately‚ the criminal justice system ignores an unnecessary lapse in its operation. Not every case handled by law enforcement will be cut and dry. Many factors contribute to unique situations that require equally unique solutions. Cases like those of Michael Brown and Eric Garner speak to that. However‚ when an officer meant to uphold the law and act in good faith engages in misconduct‚ it is only logical that they be disciplined for their
Premium