Discuss the criminal liability of Dave for the murder of Edward. (25) I would charge Dave under s18 of OAPA (1861). For a s18 offence‚ there needs to be a Mens Rea of intention where the defendant must see some harm and consequence‚ and the Actus Reus of GBH or Murder. For s18 to be applicable‚ direct intention needs to be proven. When Direct Intention cannot be proven‚ oblique intention (as per Woolin‚ however more recently Matthews and alleyene” is applied‚ which has more criteria. When it
Premium Criminal law
certain relationship established. Using case law and legal principles an attempt to justify such a duty in today’s society shall be considered. In considering its merits and drawbacks‚ with reasoned opinion‚ this essay shall conclude whether the UK criminal law should impose such a duty. In UK law it is an offence to fail to take reasonable steps to assist another person in peril in certain situations. Such duties as those arising from contract (R.v Pitwood [1902])‚ special relationships (Gibbins and
Free Criminal law Law Morality
law‚ in criminal law there are two principles of criminal liability which have to be relied upon in order to determine the guilt or innocence of the accused person. Therefore the aim of this essay is to discuss the two principles of law for criminal liability with reference to the Penal Code Act‚ Chapter Eighty Seven (87) of the Laws of Zambia and Zambian decided cases. In order to effectively do this‚ the essay will begin by generally talking about the two principles of law for criminal liability
Premium Criminal law Crime Actus reus
Principles of Criminal Liability 1/16/2013 Student ID: Word Count: 2482 Criminal activities are very common in our society. With the intention to hamper the property of other people or causing ill effect to others‚ criminal activities are occurred usually. Sometimes people involve themselves with some activities to injure others due to personal clash or from ill temperament. Some activities which may be done to cause simple injury
Free Criminal law Manslaughter
Using the IDEA structure for Criminal Law application questions – example answer. In response to questions from the Jan’ ’10 exam. 1bi) “Discuss the criminal liability of Ashok for the incident at the traffic lights.” * Identify and Define Ashok could be criminally liable for the common law offence of assault; an assault takes place when the defendant intentionally or recklessly causes the victim to apprehend immediate unlawful violence. * Explain Actus Reus and Mens Rea The actus reus
Premium Criminal law Causality Crime
Criminal Liability Essay Criminal liabilities are conditions of being actually or potentially subject to a legal obligation. Liability means legal responsibility for one’s acts or omission‚ also when acts which harms society‚ and which are prosecuted by the government. Sometimes certain negligence can lead to criminal liability. Liability needs to be distinguished from the following concepts: * culpability (purposely‚ knowingly‚ recklessly‚ negligently) - infers intent * capacity
Premium Criminal law
The Elements of Criminal Liability ACTUS REUS & MENS REA "Actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea"‚ or "an act does not make a man guilty unless his mind be also guilty (Burgess‚ 2004‚ p.8)." In criminal law‚ for an individual to commit a crime‚ there must be present two elements. They are: Actus Reus (meaning guilty act or omission); and Mens Rea (meaning guilty mind). Actus Reus is the guilty act or omission in the commissioning of a crime. In short‚ it is what the offender does
Premium Criminal law Actus reus
Identification Doctrine: Limitations in Establishing Corporate Criminal Liability The identification doctrine is the traditional method by which companies are held liable under the principles of the common law. According to this theory‚ the solution for the problem of attributing the unlawful acts to a corporation for offences that require intention was to merge the identified individual with the corporation. For the purpose of establishing corporate liability‚ a company may be responsible for the wrongful acts
Premium Criminal law Corporation Crime
Professional Regulations and Criminal Liabilities Pearl Street HCS/430 Joann Wilcox February 13‚ 2011 Consumer concerns have increased over the past few years because of the dramatic changes in health care information and its’ delivery (Benfield‚ Ashkanazi‚ Rozensky 2006). Each day patients put their physical health and trust in the hands of health care providers. Unfortunately‚ there have been times when the treatment provided‚ whether accidental or intentional‚ has caused harm to the patient
Premium Health care Health care provider Patient
equal marks. Using case law to support your arguments: 1. Discuss whether Bob may be charged with the murder of Alice‚ Karishma and Jake; and 2. Advise Bob as to whether he has the necessary mens rea to be charged with offences under s1(1)‚ s1(2) and s1(3) Criminal Damage Act 1971. The area of law in which this question concerns is murder. It is necessary to consider the extent to which Bob is likely to be guilty of the murder of Alice‚ Karishma and Jake by his intention to cause death or
Premium KILL Murder Terrorism