in unethical behaviors is because of heavy pressures on company managers to meet or beat earnings. The most recent example of this would be WorldCom. At WorldCom there were incredibly high pressures from upper management to meet profit goals. With this pressure many managers hide costs and inflated revenues over a several year period. The scheme helped WorldCom make additional acquisitions‚ support its $30 billion debt‚ as well as allow executives to cash in on their stock options. The final reason
Premium Ethics Ponzi scheme Business ethics
An oligopoly describes a market situation in which there are limited or few sellers. Each seller knows that the other seller or sellers will react to its changes in prices and also quantities. This can cause a type of chain reaction in a market situation. In the world market there are oligopolies in steel production‚ automobiles‚ semi-conductor manufacturing‚ cigarettes‚ cereals‚ and also in telecommunications. Often times oligopolistic industries supply a similar or identical product. These
Premium Monopoly Oligopoly Cartel
accounting issues resulting in an improvement in financial reporting. Page 4 However‚ he goes on to say he has doubts about whether we have experienced such a drop in actual fraud in financial reporting. Although there may not be such Scandals as WorldCom or Enron‚ he doesn’t believe that a reduction in fraud will occur just because of Sarbanes-Oxley or other
Premium Enron
for reviewing and approving the use of resources and caring for shareholder interests. (45-46) One of the most well known examples of a board of directors who did not meet it’s responsibility is WorldCom. The board of directors did not control and monitor the CEO who led the destruction of WorldCom and was convicted of accounting fraud and sentenced to 25 years in prison. The CEO ran the company the way he wanted to with his goal of achieving financial growth through acquisitions without having
Premium Corporation Corporate governance Management
2000’s for their misleading accounting methods‚ leading investors to believe the company was making billions; in which the government step-in‚ and created the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) of 2002. In early 2000’s‚ numerous Fortune 500 companies‚ Enron‚ WorldCom‚ Arthur Anderson and Adelphia and others‚ were alleged practicing complex accounting methods to cover their huge debt‚ while claiming they were making billions of dollars (Ferrell‚ O. C.‚ Hirt‚ G. A.‚ & Ferrell‚ L. 2005). However‚ the accounting
Premium Enron scandal Fortune 500 Enron
Sarbanes-Oxley Act Brandie Cortinas ENGL 145(D-21) 5-12-14 Ms. Vivian Abstract The act enacted in response to financial problems to protect the public from accounting errors and fraud. The act does not specify how a business should store their records; rather‚ it defines which records are to be stored and for how long they’re going to be stored. The act affects the financial corporations and the IT department. All business records must be saved for more than five
Premium Corporate governance Internal control Sarbanes–Oxley Act
the financial system. The July 2002 enactment of the Sarbanes Oxley Act‚ co-authored by U.S. Sen. Paul Sarbanes of Maryland and U.S. Rep. Michael Oxley of Ohio‚ followed a series of large public company failures that included Enron‚ Tyco and WorldCom. Sarbanes-Oxley addressed investor confidence and fraud through reform of the public company reporting standards. However‚ much damage in the market occurred with the collapse of several major companies between 2002 and 2004. (smallbusiness.chron
Premium Enron Economics Sarbanes–Oxley Act
GAMMAD‚ MARY JANE M. (Art. 1833-1836) ARTICLE 1833 Where the dissolution is caused bythe act‚ death or insolvency of partner‚ eachpartner is liable to his co-partners for his share of any liability created by any partner acting for thepartnership as if the partnership had not beendissolved unless: 1.)The dissolution being the act of anypartner‚ the partner acting for thepartnership had knowledge of thedissolution; or 2.)The dissolution being by the death orinsolvency of a partner‚ the partner actingfor
Premium Partnership Bankruptcy Liquidation
Company would have to engage in accounting practices for which there was no legitimate justification‚ and Ebbers replied to Sullivan‚ in words or in substance‚ “We have to hit our numbers.” Scott Sullivan’s position of Chief Financial Officer at WorldCom‚ in conjunction with weak controls‚ presented opportunities for him to commit fraudulent activities. Sullivan’s high position allowed him to dictate his power over his subordinates and often directed them to make large entries to the general ledgers
Premium General ledger Chief financial officer Revenue
Internal Audit and the Relationship with Senior Management Summary: The case study “Internal Audit Reporting Relationships: Serving Two Masters” was a part of a series of research projects being developed by the Institute of Internal Auditors to determine the various relationships‚ specifically reporting relationships between the internal auditor and those charged with governance. To obtain research about the various types of reporting relationships‚ independence‚ conflicts that arise from
Premium Internal audit Auditing