1 NEGOTIATION SKILLS S2‚ 2012 WEEK 2: DISTRIBUTIVE BARGAINING 2 Today’s lecture: Distributive bargaining • • • • • The basic negotiation strategies Distributive bargaining scenarios Fundamentals of distributive bargaining Tasks to focus on Distributive tactics • Results from conflict management styles survey 3 Choosing a negotiation strategy • Distributive • Conflicting goals‚ fixed pie (“zerosum game”)‚ task is to claim value and maximize personal gains • Shared goals
Premium Negotiation Dispute resolution Bargaining
Distributive and integrative bargaining requires different strategies‚ tactics and skill sets in a negotiator to be successfully implemented. Distributive bargaining is know as a win-lose situation based on a fixed amount that has to be divided‚ whereas integrative bargaining is a win-win situation based on a mutually satisfactory solution. Distributive bargaining is most often referred to as a fixed pix negotiation. There is only so much to go around and it creates a competitive or sometimes
Premium Negotiation Bargaining
Difference between Distributive and Integrative Bargaining Raymond Yang Garcia 1) The difference between distributive and integrative bargaining Negotiation approaches are generally described as either distributive or integrative. At the heart of each strategy is a measurement of conflict between each party’s desired outcomes. Consider the following situation. Chris‚ an entrepreneur‚ is starting a new business that will occupy most of his free time for the near future. Living in a fancy new
Premium Negotiation Bargaining Collective bargaining
Distributive bargaining‚ also known as a win-lose bargaining process is a competitive negotiation approach that is utilized to choose in what way a fixed resource such as money will be distributed. It is assumed by each person involved that in this method gains for one party’s interests will come at the expense of the other party for the reason that there is a limited quantity of resources obtainable to the parties with which to meet bargaining goals. (Holley‚ Jennings‚ Wolters‚ 2012 pg.257) In other
Premium Negotiation
Distributive Justice (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) Page 1 of 26 Open access to the SEP is made possible by a world-wide funding initiative. Please Read How You Can Help Keep the Encyclopedia Free Distributive Justice First published Sun Sep 22‚ 1996; substantive revision Mon Mar 5‚ 2007 Principles of distributive justice are normative principles designed to guide the allocation of the benefits and burdens of economic activity. After outlining the scope of this entry and the role
Premium Political philosophy Law Justice
philosophers as well as economists. One of the topic raised is utilitarianism as the principle that holds inequality and distributive justice by Jeremy Betham (1748-1832). The idea is that the distribution of goods is just if and only if it maximizes aggregate utility (Reiss‚ 2013 p.256). Some critics were later discovered whether utilitarianism sustains the concept of distributive justice. Reiss for instance argued that utilitarianism ignores people’s right (p.261). Other conceptual difficulties of
Premium Justice Distributive justice Economic inequality
Aristotelian Ethics & Distributive Justice Concern with material equality as the central form of distributive justice is a very modern idea. Distributive justice for Aristotle and many other writers for millennia after him was a matter of distributing what each ought to get from merit or desert in some sense. The idea of equality was arguably anathema to Aristotle and most other theorists‚ including Catholic philosophers‚ until modern times‚ indeed until the nineteenth century. A common view was
Premium Justice Utilitarianism Magistrate
Collective Bargaining Collective bargaining is method that some employers use to negotiate with employees. Collective bargaining does not exist in every organization. However‚ each organization that contributes to collective bargaining must ensure they are complying with different laws. This essay will explain the right to work laws with an analysis of the provisions of the Taft-Hartley Act‚ an explanation of the National Labor Board‚ and evaluate Human Resources‚ products‚ and services in collective
Premium Collective bargaining National Labor Relations Act Trade union
1. Bargaining structure – the resulting organizational structure for the collective bargaining process. 2. Pattern bargaining – the union bargains exclusively with that target company until an agreement is reached. 3. Bargaining power – a popular conceptualization is “the ability to secure another’s agreement on one’s own terms.” 4. Bargaining environment – is the diverse set of external influences on labor and management as they sit at a bargaining table negotiating a contract. 5
Premium Collective bargaining Negotiation Trade union
Bargaining Powers of Customers Porters’ competitive factors theory is a framework for industry analysis and corporate strategy development. It draws an overview picture that industry rivalry is affected by five main forces‚ which are bargaining powers of customers‚ bargaining powers of suppliers‚ threat of new entrant and threats of substitute products. Relating Porters’ thesis and the topic of managing customers‚ element named bargaining powers of customers‚ which can be briefly understood as
Premium 21st century Bargaining Customer