specilSpecialised audit services SECTION 2: SPECIALISED AUDIT SERVICES 2003-04 This section of the report includes information on audits conducted over and above the regularity audits. These include the following: • Forensic audits • Performance audits • Integrated audits • Performance information reviews For an explanation of each type of audit‚ please refer to my 2003-04 Activity Report. It is important to highlight that some of the forensic and performance audits result in a report to management
Premium Audit Auditor's report Auditing
UNIVERSITY Institute of Accounts‚ Business & Finance Audit Communications Report Writing Canayon‚ Angelie Rose T. Puno‚ Michelle Ann J. Royong‚ Precious B. Rubio‚ Ephraim Jomel P. Tulio‚ Ayn Carla M. AIA0212 TOPIC OR SECTION: Account Receivable: Cashier’s Office I. SCOPE An audit of the Cashier’s Office was conducted for the period January 1‚ 2013 through December 31‚ 2013. The objectives of the audit were to examine and evaluate the following: • Adequacy and
Premium Cheque Cash register Internal control
Certification Criteria Version 1.1 February 9‚ 2011 © 2010 The Certification Commission for Health Information Technology N = New for LTPAC NS = New for Skilled Nursing Facility Add-on NH = New for Home Health Add-on R = Roadmap for LTPAC RS = Roadmap for Skilled Nursing Facility RH = Roadmap for Home Health O = Provisional for 2011 (shaded in YELLOW) Roadmap 1 2011 Certification Roadmap 2 Comments Criteria Reference Test Script and Step Number SEC = Security Test Script Criteria # Category
Premium Health care Medicine Electronic health record
CONTROLS IN AN EDP ENVIRONMENT The second standard of field work requires that we obtain a sufficient understanding of the client’s internal controls (I/C) to plan the audit and assess control risk. We hope that our assessment of control risk shows it to be low so that we can reduce substantive testing‚ thereby reducing audit costs. When EDP is used in significant accounting applications‚ then you must consider the effects the computer has when evaluating the internal controls. The auditor’s
Premium Internal control Auditing Financial audit
Operational Audit Best Practices A methodology to Conduct Operational Audit in Public Sector Organizations What is Operational Audit? Operational Audit is a methodology for assessing the conformity of implementing the procedures and methodologies set forth in the department’s instructions‚ regulations or documents. Operational audit is performed by specialized auditors. Upon completion of the auditing process‚ a report of findings with recommendations is submitted. Operational audit contributes to
Premium Audit Auditing Internal control
Water Quality Water Quality Criteria are levels of individual pollutants or water quality characteristics‚ or descriptions of conditions of a body of water that‚ if met‚ will generally protect the designated use of the water. For a given DU‚ there are likely to be a number of criteria dealing with different types of conditions‚ as well as levels of specific chemicals... Water quality criteria must be fit the use of water. Only scientific considerations are taken into consideration when determining
Premium Water
Establishing evaluation criteria is needed to evaluate alternatives and to make decisions. Depending on the nature of the problem different constraints may be used to design a policy. Once evaluating a clear criterion‚ we must go through a process of identifying alternatives that will later be evaluated in the terms of criteria. Evaluation criteria are grouped in four categories‚ identified by Bardach. For each policy problem‚ we should be able to identify relevant criteria in each category. They
Premium Cost-benefit analysis Costs Cost
the same four criteria‚ another study identified adolescents who fulfilled diagnostic criteria for caffeine dependence. These studies‚ which represent a series of case reports‚ demonstrate that a clinically meaningful caffeine dependence syndrome does exist. When individuals in the general population are surveyed about their caffeine use‚ a surprisingly large proportion endorse substance dependence criteria. In a random digit-dial telephone survey in which all seven DSM-IV criteria for substance
Premium Drug addiction Addiction Heroin
EVALUATION OF THE SOFTWARE “LENDING SYSTEM OF AN EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION: BASIS FOR SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT.” Evaluation Criteria 4 = Outstanding (O) 3 = Good (G) 2 = Satisfactory (S) 1 = Poor (P) User Interaction These criteria cover the user’s interaction with the program‚ the objectives and features of the program‚ and your analysis of it. 4 (O) 3 (G) 2 (S) 1 (P) 1. The purpose of the program is well defined and clearly explained to the user 2. The organization
Premium Computer software Computer Clear
WorldCom The Story of a Whistleblower . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.5 Hollinger International . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Realities of Audit-Related Litigation instructor resource Manual — do not coPy or redistribute instructor resource Manual — do not coPy or redistribute a day in the life of brent dorsey staff auditor Professional Pressures inS tr uc t ional o b je c t ive
Premium Ethics Auditing Audit