154 Amonoy vs. Gutierrez G.R. No. 140420‚ February 15‚ 2001 FACTS This case had its roots in Special Proceedings No. 3103 of Branch I of the CFI of Pasig‚ Rizal‚ for the settlement of the estate of the deceased Julio Cantolos‚ involving six (6) parcels of land situated in Tanay Rizal. Amonoy was the counsel of therein Francisca Catolos‚ Agnes Catolos‚ Asuncion Pasamba and Alfonso Formida. On 12 January 1965‚ the Project of Partition submitted was approved and xxx two (2) of the said lots were adjudicated
Premium Tort Supreme Court of the United States Legal terms
The Truman Doctrine was established on May‚ 12 1947‚ in Truman’s speech to congress concerning the Greece. The Truman promised to economically and militarily aid all free people facing threats of subjugation. The doctrine itself was not a major turning point in short term foreign policy‚ as he had established similar ideas in containment months earlier; however‚ it
Premium Cold War World War II
Brown vs. Board of Education is the first case to set a positive example for educators in relation to the rights of the students. This case acknowledges the fact that an African American student should be able to white students (Chinn and Gollnick‚ 2006). This case was so exemplary because it was the first case to set a standard of integration instead of segregation. Brown vs. Board of Education is such a famous case because it not only gave African American students a right to a better education;
Premium Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
Legal Issues in Management Final Case Study Christine Stout Southern Oregon University Business law – case study The case study of John and Stacey has so many complicated elements that apparently all the stakeholders involved apart from the two mentioned could sue or be sued against. This paper assumes that this is the scenario for this paper. The characters involved are John and Stacy‚ a restaurant owner‚ the owner of a townhouse‚ the owner of the mink on which John tripped and subsequently
Premium Contract Law
bestowed on Nigeria by colonial masters‚ common law principles‚ rules and doctrines have tremendous influence on administration of justice system in the country. Particularly as an offshoot of that influence‚ the common law doctrine of stare decisis‚ translated as judicial precedent or simply as precedent‚1 has come to be regarded as a source of law in the country.2 Simply put‚ stare decisis is a practice in the administration of justice in common law jurisdictions‚3 whereby a court is bound to follow
Free Common law Law Sharia
neutral third party or panel of experts hears a dispute and imposes a resolution of the parties” (Miller & Jentz‚ 2008‚ p.50). However‚ both parties must sign and agree to the above statement for it to be acknowledged as a legal judgment. In the case of Thomas Baker and Osborne Development Corporation it gets a little bit more involved. For starters‚ Osborne Development purchased the home warranty program administered by Home Buyers Warranty and signed the agreement of arbitration with them.
Premium Appeal Arbitration Dispute resolution
Aristotle’s Doctrine of the Mean and the Problem of Self-Control Introduction Aristotle’s Nicomahean Ethics is a rich text of ancient wisdom‚ much of which has become ingrained into today’s rhetoric in many schools of thought in the western world. It is with Aristotle’s views on Virtue that this paper is primarily concerned‚ more specifically with his idea that to have virtue is to display attitudes and actions to a moderate and intermediate degree. Stan Van Hooft (2008) notes that‚ although
Premium Virtue Ethics Nicomachean Ethics
Stalin. All of these events and more created a great divide between Russia‚ the U.S.‚ and Great Britain. After the U.S. president‚ Henry Truman passed‚ the Truman Doctrine‚ that stated that any
Premium World War II Soviet Union Cold War
R vs Sharpe (1)Sources: R v Sharpe Decisions‚ February 8/2013 CBC NEWS‚ R vs Sharpe: Excerpts from the Supreme Court ruling on Child Pornography‚ March 8/2004 Title: R vs Sharpe Who: John Sharpe Date: January 26‚ 2001 (2) Case Facts: -Accusations were made about John Sharpe that he had possession of child pornography tapes -Led police to an investigation of his house‚ finding multiple disks labeled ‘boyabuse’ -Sharpe was charged with two counts of possession of child pornography‚ under
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Supreme court Human sexual behavior
Repair- Reconstruction Doctrine is a fundamental doctrine prevalent mostly in USA and few other countries which holds that a purchaser of a patented product may ‘repair’ the product but may not ‘reconstruct’ it. This definition though looks simple on the face of it‚ yet it is one of the most controversial doctrine with regard to patent laws across the globe. This is because of the primary reason that‚ more often the two verbs namely: ‘repair’ and ‘reconstruction’ overlap. The challenge with regard
Premium Copyright United States Law